The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Something about the extreme social Darwinism screams Hitler is not excluding Killing as a apart of the “Struggle” he so dearly exalts. “Thus, the struggle for daily bread becomes in reality a struggle for the soil which produces this daily bread; that is, for space itself. It is an iron principle: t ...

Going forward, posts like the above that don't meaningfully contribute to the thread topic will be moved to this thread.

Mass showers and delousing chambers certainly conflict with the morgue interpretation. I supposed people could shelter inside the Leichenkeller during a raid, if it had a normal mortuary function. The corpse storage hypothesis fits OK with your, it was a normal mortuary hypothesis. Why couldn't you ...

“So-called revisionists have come up with 5 competing hypothesis” This is nonsense. Revisionists agree with the fundamental purpose as described by Himmler. Where there has been some disagreement is over the interpretations of very specific construction documents where there is insufficient con ...

Except, he wasn't. Despite knowing they were being accused of mass murder in death camps, Himmler did nothing to produce evidence that was not true and of millions of Jews still alive in camps and ghettos in 1944-5, evidence of which would have ended the mass murder claims instantly. The Nazis ...

And he's doubling down. He is seriously claiming that Himmler is "irrelevant" as a witness because he didn't personally work in the Kremas. Hilarious. Nessie, a basic principle of source criticism is, "The reliability of a given source is relative to the questions put to it." The question raised ...

Wasn't Himmler the one Vrba said saw a gassing on site at Birkenau in 1943? :lol: Yes, Vrba went on about this for several pages in his memoir. Although he had to backtrack on this story on the stand at the Zundel trial when it became clear the story was made up. https://codohforum.com/viewtopic ...

Keen, you might want to try to change up your marketing strategy.

100% of eyewitnesses, who worked at the Kremas, whose evidence is not hearsay, claim they were used for gassings. 100% of a subset, of a subset. So not 100% Are you the same guy prattling on about convergence all the time? In any other example you always defer to authority, except when Archie ...

There are different archaeological approaches that can be used such as LIDAR, ground penetrating radar, core sampling, partial excavation, full excavation. The less invasive techniques can usually tell you only if there is disturbed ground. If you look at the German excavation at Katyn, they ...

Can you explain why you need to ignore 100% of the Krema staff, who all say something else took place? Hoess and Nyiszli do not contradict each other, they both say the Kremas were modified to be used as gas chambers. You even quoted Hoess admitting to that. They only vary in the details of that ...

And never forget that 'convergence of evidence' was cemented in law by the use of Judicial notice . According to so-called revisionists, the evidence converges to the Kremas being bomb shelters, mass showers, delousing chambers, corpse stores and normally operating morgues/crematoriums. Why can so ...

To be more accurate, 100% of witnesses who WORKED at the Kremas and who were EYEWITNESSES to their operation. That point is someone what important. The whole point of limiting the pool of witnesses would be to screen for witnesses who would be in a position to know one way or the other. Himmler ...

Ron Unz has a pretty good article on it. He mentions several longer books on the topic for those who wish to dig deeper. https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-adl-in-american-society/ The ADL wants us to believe that the Atlanta court in 1913 was biased against Frank ... in favor of the black ...

Certain posters on the forum have been claiming that "100% of witnesses" say that the Birkenau crematoria were gas chambers and that there are zero witnesses who say these facilities could have been for anything else. Moreover, there is supposedly a "convergence of evidence" proving the gas chambers ...