The CODOH Revisionist Forum

It does when one hypothesis is that they were used as delousing chambers, when many argue they were barely exposed to any HCN. It is possible to shelter in a gas chambers, during a raid, as is evidenced to have happened. Taking a shower in a corpse store is not "good agreement". As for secondary ...

Holocaust Believers have claimed that the reason there are Iron Blue cyanide stains in delousing chambers but not in the gas chamber morgues is because: Dynamite destroyed them. (JC Pressac) The exposure time "per day" was 1/100th as long. (Pressac, with less extreme claims by others) They ...

It is not clear where the historical inconsistency is, there. Buildings originally designed as mortuaries/crematoriums were repurposed as gas chambers. All historians agree on that. So-called revisionists claim the buildings were converted from their intended use to be showers, delousing chambers ...

False premise. There isn't a consensus on "the Holocaust" and there never has been. There is a fake consensus that is maintained via coercion. There isn't a consensus and there is a consensus. In a way that is correct. There is a consensus on certain events of the Holocaust, such as registration of ...

I saw an amusing article in the NYT which presents a "revisionist" account of the origin of basketball. The claim is that basketball was not really invented by James Naismith in 1891 but a year earlier in Herkimer, New York. There are many of these controversies over "firsts" and over inventions ...

If there is any agitation against any regime in the Middle East, it's a good rule of thumb to assume by default that it is primarily due to Jewish/Zionist interests.

From the archive on the Jewish role in the Iraq War
https://archive.codohforum.com/20230609 ... cd9c1.html

Fail! Another epic fail. Proving this person is a dishonest time-waster. A refusal to ever admit error = someone arguing dishonestly. As a revisionist, you reject or deny certain aspects of the Holocaust so what do you accept to be true? Maybe I'm wrong that you are a Holocaust denier but I'm ...

I am not against you presenting evidence. In fact, I am insisting that you present evidence instead of claiming to have all this evidence and never delivering. If you had a good case, you would present the argumentation and support for your position and, if it were convincing, this would naturally ...

"The Holocaust is true because reasons"

Nessie frequently says the holohoaxer side is in complete agreement and is therefore correct while revisionists supposedly cannot agree among themselves and are therefore wrong. Back on topic, and away from attacks on a forum member, having been there too many times before, a question about evidence ...

You ignore 100% of the eyewitness evidence, and a lot of the circumstantial evidence around the operation of the Kremas, and then come up with wildly different, unevidenced "interpretations". Yawn. We now have multiple thread debunking your "100% of the eyewitnesses" nonsense. When you are ...

The Auschwitz museum website publishes photos with the name, date of birth, date of deportation and the supposed end of this individual, usually saying that after selection he was killed in a gas chamber. You offer nothing more, only your authority. But for the exterminationists it is up to us to ...

We can all get off our high horses about how logical we think we are and how the other side is completely illogical. One of either the exterminationist or revisionist camp is completely incorrect about what happened as it relates to the Holocaust. This is binary, the Holocaust can't have happened a ...

Allow me to respond to this post since Archie did not. Yes, I don't have the patience to continue to reply to CJ's brazen plagiarisms. The first sentence for example: The electric floor claim was first reported in the New York Times in 1942 and quoted sources from the Polish government-in-exile ...

I never interacted with him directly on the forums (I arrived a little after he had disappeared), but I had seen his old posts on Old CODOH, RODOH, and Skeptics. He did a lot of primary research, but unfortunately it doesn't seem he ever published much aside from on forums and his blog which went ...