The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Here an updated version of the Gleiwitz/Naujocks document list, since the links to the last 2 ones went stale and I added more German public prosecution files: 1. Various British documents concerning Naujocks interrogation, mostly 1944-45: https://archive.org/details/alfred-naujocks-british-archive ...

11. Quick magazine, issues 36 - 40, 1964 Too long to reproduce here, it is contained in the PDF p. 49. Since the original link under 5. in the list above does not seem to work anymore, here an alternative one: https://www.landesarchiv-berlin.findbuch.net/php/main.php#42205265702e203035372d3031x9 ...

7. Testimony of Alfred Naujocks at Nuremberg, 12.10.1945 Too long to reproduce here, see https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=1642317#p1642317 - This is earliest instance I could find where Naujocks is aware of the correct date for the Gleiwitz attack and that the Gleiwitz installation was ...

A few more publications by the German Foreign Ministry: Bolschewistische Verbrechen gegen Kriegsrecht und Menschlichkeit, Bd. 1, 1941 [Bolshevist crimes against the rules of war and humanity, vol.1] https://archive.org/details/auswartiges-amt-bolschewistische-verbrechen-v-3/Ausw%C3%A4rtiges%20Amt%20 ...

I had always assumed with producer gas you would just employ the vapor maker and not the combustion engine, why bother with running an engine? Just to move a bit more air around? Yes., for gassing purposes adding a combustion engine to the producer gas generator would be obviously counterproductive ...

1. CO in the high concentrations in producer gas poses an explosion risk There is of course no reason that the concentration in the gas chamber needs to be the same than those of the generator. When the desired concentration has been reached, simply stop further influx. Note that the use of Zyklon B ...

I realize that since the Holocaust is a purely fictional event, one starting date for it is as good as any other. But if it is one thing that revisionists have achieved, it is that they forced the Holocaust propagators to come up with an at least semi-coherent "canon" version of the Holocaust in ...

That is a barefaced lie, there is a ton of evidence to prove they were killed. The standard reaction to that lie is to ask for evidence they survived and millions were still alive at the end of the war. Give a list of who "they" are. Or, for starters, at least give the number of "they". No one is ...

Did you try https://gab.ai ? I don't think Andrew Torba has the resources to create a new model from scratch, but it seems they were able to tweak an existing model to be less biased:

I myself have on occasion talked about direct vs indirect arguments and evidence. The way I have used it is usually in the context of the where-did-they-go gambit. I would posit that direct-indirect is not the most relevant category here. It is more shifting the burden of proof - since they can't ...

You are revealling your ignorance of the history of events. The mass killings started in 1941, with Operation Barbarossa, the invason of the Soviet Union and the Einsatzgruppen. By January 1943, the AR camps at Sobibor, TII and Belzec, between them, had been operational for about 20 months. I ...

Report to Himmler from 1943, list Jewish populations by region; http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/korherr.html The first figure is the Jewish population in censuses from the 1930s, the second in 1943. Altreich, 502,799 to 51,000. Austria, 191,481 to 8,000. Czech Protectorate, 356 ...

A tiny number of examples, some of which have been deliberate hoaxing, is not evidence to prove the millions recorded on the databases are all suspect. Every part that has been looked at, had major defects. There is no reason to assume those parts that have not yet been examined are any better. And ...

My last responses were replies to you. You are using the illogical argument that since you find gassings implausible, therefore they did not happen. Why are you relying on an illogical argument and not contemporaneous evidence, such as eyewitnesses and documents, to prove no gassings took place ...

You need to prove there has been a refusal to identify Holocaust victims. You, for instance, certainly refuse. You vaguely talk about unspecified "millions" but refuse to identify even a single concrete person. You need to prove that " most of the entries duplicates and fakes" and that the names on ...