The CODOH Revisionist Forum

If you don't want to or can't answer the question, that's fine, but then don't pretend like you are interested in rational discussion or debate. It's important to get on the same page upfront to prevent miscommunications about such emotionally driven and vague words. There is a forum for that. In ...

Is it ever OK to demonize anybody? Hitler was very close friends with Ernst Rohm until his desire to merge the SA paramilitary with the Germany military under his leadership threatened the Nazi military elites. During the Night of the Long Knives, Hitler ordered a purge of the SA and had his friend ...

Urban Moving Systems Urban Moving Systems was a NJ based moving company that came under scrutiny after 9/11 when five of its employees, Israeli nationals, were detained for suspicious behavior, including reportedly filming and celebrating the attacks. This gave rise to various conspiracy theories ...

If you don't want to or can't answer the question, that's fine, but then don't pretend like you are interested in rational discussion or debate. It's important to get on the same page upfront to prevent miscommunications about such emotionally driven and vague words.

Bolshevism emerged from the Russian Revolution of 1917, when the Bolshevik Party, led by Vladimir Lenin, overthrew the Provisional Government and took control of Russia. The Bolsheviks, inspired by Marxist ideas, sought to establish a socialist state by abolishing capitalism, overthrowing the ...

You say you're committed to truth, not ideology — and I can respect that. But how is it possible that basically every serious historian across countries and political lines converge on the same conclusion about the Holocaust? I understand distrusting institutions or questioning narratives. That's f ...

After the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir to the Austro Hungarian throne, Serbia was viewed as a significant threat. The assassination took place in Sarajevo, Bosnia, which had been annexed by Austria-Hungary in 1908 which angered many Serbs and fueled nationalist movements ...

Evidence is any information, data, or material that is used to support or refute a claim, belief, or proposition. In all cases, evidence must be relevant, and its credibility and weight determine how persuasive it is. Having evidence for something does not automatically make it true. Evidence ...

I don't get it. How can you guys actually think this? Are you just trolling or are you serious? Are you playing word games about what the Holocaust means? How many Jewish people do you guys know? Have you had a bad experience with a Jewish person in real life or something? What's going on guys?

HansHill wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:39 pm

ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:03 pm Truth has no ethnic lens

Truth transcends ethnicity

Let's test this. Did the Holocaust happen?

The Holocaust is just a word. How would you define it in your own words and then we can look at the evidence to see if it happened or not.

HansHill wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 8:45 pm >Joins Codoh
>Calls himself "ConfusedJew"
>Defends Leo Frank
>Defends ADL
>Begrudges that White people view topics like this through an ethnic lens
>Urges us not to

Am I on a gameshow? Is this a simulation?

Truth has no ethnic lens

Truth transcends ethnicity

My kin convicted him of rape and murder because he was guilty. Near where I live today a White pedophile was hung by a lynch mob before his trial. Don't rape children, simple rule. Murdering children is out too. Yes, there was plenty of evidence. That you continue to try to create reasonable doubt ...

Look, I understand that Leo Frank was found guilty, and to you, this is a miscarriage of justice, because she was just a little goy girl. That does nothing to negate the fact that Leo Frank was found guilty, sentenced to death and justice was served, regardless of all of the attempts to subvert ...

I watched the YouTube video about the "true history" of The ADL but there are a lot of inaccuracies in it. I'll go through each one. The video said Leo Frank was "proven 102% guilty" which is definitely false. The conviction was based on circumstantial evidence. For a criminal conviction, you need ...

You said "a lot of things" in the articles "are clearly false" but you failed to mention even one factual error. All you're saying here is that "credible sources" (i.e., Jewish academics) say Frank was innocent, but that is not evidence . In 1982, they dredged up some witness out of nowhere named ...