The CODOH Revisionist Forum

This thread has been derailed again. I want to focus on the amount of time it took for all of the HCN to evaporate or be removed. I'm not able to find the original Degesch manual from before the war. you do not need the manual as the same product was made elsewhere and all the data is available ...

U boat

Blue staining will appear gradually, starting in the plasterwork and then working its way into the bricks. There is no iron in plaster so Prussian Blue cannot form from HCN on plaster. Bricks have iron the quantity depending on the brick. There are other factors such as moisture which determine the ...

Looking at the forensics, without looking at the other evidence, is cherry-picking and poor evidential procedure. This thread is about "forensics", not your attempt to once again deflect. You must realise the unknown. For prussian blue to form, the iron content within the bricks is a factor. It ...

Nessie wrote: ↑Sat Jul 26, 2025 7:20 am Why the difference? The answer is that Kremas II and III had the Kula columns and Kremas IV and V did not.

What has this got to do with forensic chemistry.?

This thread is about the archaeology of TII, the AR camp on the spur line to the Treblinka quarry and labour camp and in particular the 1945, 2011 and 2024 archaeological surveys. If anyone wants to discuss other possible camps in the area, then make that into another thread. Oh you mean the two ...

Wólka Okrąglik is about 2 km from TII, and TII is about 1.9 km SW from TI. Definitely more south than west, but the description is otherwise accurate. I'm not sure why you take issue with it. In the course of the activities, with the witnesses and the village leader consulted for information and e ...

What about their claim that TII was a death camp? If there was a death camp it was some 5km south of the current TII, at Kosow Lacki, at least according to the CIA reports and the elders of Wolka Okraglik. "On 6 November 1945, investigating judge Z Łukaszkiewicz, in the presence of J. Maciejewski, ...

So, a second hand report, with no primary sources of evidence. You would not normally believe the Central Jewish Historical Commission. You also gloss over how critical they are of the Soviets, who you usually claim were their masters. Do you believe them when they concluded TII was a death camp ...

You have no evidence bombs were dropped on TII, or that it was used for artillery fire. The following is evidence http://www.vho.org/GB/c/AmicusCuriaeDemjanjuk.html The Central Jewish Historical Commission in Poland, compiled in late 1945, [which] stated that the terrain of the Treblinka II camp ...

No. The 2011 GPR survey identified rectangular ground disturbances, in the parts of the camp where witnesses stated mass graves were located. The 1945 survey, using excavations, was not able to so clearly differentiate between the mass graves and where grave robbers had dug up the ground. So grave ...

There are no forensic chemists participating in this debate. The result is amateurs scrabbling about, sharing their thoughts, and illogically arguing that because they cannot work out the forensic chemistry of the gas chambers, there were no gas chambers. I am a trained explosives chemist, which ...

Nessie wrote: ↑Mon Jul 21, 2025 7:35 am Why are you legitimising their argument from incredulity, by arguing with them, as if their argument is logical?

This is a discussion on forensic chemistry, something you know nothing about so best to say naught.

I don't get it. How can you guys actually think this? Are you just trolling or are you serious? Are you playing word games about what the Holocaust means? The term holocaust has become synonymous with the term "Genocide", which it is not. The term Holocaust is specific to Jews. Genocide such as the ...

Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Jul 18, 2025 10:33 am there was no Holocaust and TII is not a mass burial site for hundreds of thousands of people.

Thank you for finally speaking some reality.