The CODOH Revisionist Forum

They actually witnessed the event as it happened. I have determined that most of these witnesses were under duress or spies; the evidence they present has little value. In those days the modern day legal finesse was not applicable but closer to Tombstone and the OK coral, with the hanging judge ...

Nazgul, I'm glad you appeared. I have been wondering if anyone could answer the following questions. Perhaps you can: V - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; If 100 graves contained the bones and teeth of 2.1 million people - then each grave would contain, on average, the remains of 21,000 people ...

Now why would Callafangers, after making this statement: whether an allegation has occurred at all is fairly black-and-white refuse to anser these questions: Callafangers, can an allegation be substantiated? Callafangers, can you provide credible and convincing evidence that it has been alleged in ...

Not according to the Topf & Sons engineer who designed it. I believe him, since there is evidence to corroborate him that there were ventilated gas chambers inside the Kremas. Morgues are designed and equipped to manage gases that may be released from bodies, particularly during the process of ...

There are documents recording the construction of gas chambers in the Kremas, so by definition, there were gas chambers. There were documents relating to the control of gases as all morgues have. Morgues are designed and equipped to manage gases that may be released from bodies, particularly during ...

Nessie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 26, 2025 9:03 am You do not have any documents about storing corpses in the Leichenkeller, or witnesses to that happening.

Leichenkeller = morgue cellar. You called it that, so by definition contained corpses.

No, I asked you to evidence what happened, not list the reasons why you think gassings did not happen, because you find the witness descriptions and technicalities of gassings, too incredulous to believe. Your argument from incredulity is a logical fallacy. You have admitted that you fail at the ...

The scale of the false death tolls for A-B and some other camps, is nothing like the scale of hoaxing the entire Holocaust. You are making a false equivalence, yet another logically flawed argument from you! The alleged Holocaust was the murder of 6 million people. There were originally 4 million ...

- any disagreement is explained by hearsay - they rely on the argument from incredulity I do not think gassings were the issues for trials. Marian Olszuk at Treblinka was not hearsay, he saw nothing, that is not incredulity except in your cognition. Interesting he was never asked to testify at the ...

Nessie wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 10:23 am people not needed for work disappearing, that is evidence to prove mass murder.

Invalid euthanasia, 14f13, a fact, the reasons for the selections. Legal under Reich law.

'Genocide by telepathy' was Robert Faurisson's spin on Hilberg's remark about 'incredible meeting of minds' at the Wannsee conference. Hilberg who, in a speech reportedly made in 1983 is quoted as saying, “What began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized c ...

Does it not bother you that your AR camps were customs posts theory, has not just little to no support amongst fellow revisionists, but many completely disagree with you? You don't even stick to that theory, as you often switch to claiming people did not even arrive at the AR camps and instead they ...

This thread proves so-called revisionists fail to revise history and when they try they fall apart. :lol: Why laugh at yourself? You only have opinions, valid perhaps only for yourself. Many are interested in the real story not the ramblings of some Highlander who loves the "uisce beatha", or water ...

That has happened because none of the revisionists have any relevant experience invstigating history, or criminality and they do not really know what they are doing. The result is not revisionism, it is denial. They deny mass gassings took place and then fail to follow on to an evidenced, logical ...

Nessie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 8:14 am
The fact remains, I am evidentially and logically correct, that Green wins over Rudolf, because mass gassings are evidenced to have happened.

What has this got to do with convergence of evidence. You are not relying on convergence but a mere belief that the testimonies are truthful.