The CODOH Revisionist Forum

It's part of your delusion (extreme bias) that you think the Nazis would have necessarily only killed out of evil. Rather perhaps they wouldn't have wanted more witnesses to the various inhumanities that happened at the camp. W regard to Jews you can read Eichmann's words, it was another delusion ...

Foot injury treated in hospital? Check Given life saving surgery? Check Medical advice given about moving his father? Check Offer not to separate them? Check Yes, of course, he was afraid it was an evil nazi ploy and they would be shot if they stayed ... No Bombsaway. Just no. It's part of your ...

An exposition from CODOH about the Salvation Marches; https://codoh.com/library/document/the-death-marches-that-saved-lives/ Sorry Nessie, I haven't reread 'Night' or 'Diary of a Young Girl' yet for you to cite the voluntary nature of the Salvation Marches. Do however feel entirely free to read ...

Stubble wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 9:45 pmWannsee for one.

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=7201#p7201

"I never claimed there was explicit indication of genocide."

Bias to a certain degree (this is subjective) is delusion.

Not exactly, I said the grave space was incongruent with the claim of hundreds of thousands. There is no doubt people died during ww2. There is no doubt that some of those persons were jews. There is no doubt that some of those jews died in captivity, in transit or by executions. Our main point of ...

How did Bronowski calculate his 4,000,000? (Bronowski was a mathematician btw) They did not calculate. The method seems to be guessing. But I presume they got some figures somewhere and then concocted up a figure that sounds plausible to a gullible audience. Note that the figures don't correspond ...

Well, if you are correct, 'Ze Germans' found them, murdered them, and blew their remains into the wind, or threw their remains into the river, or used their remains as fertilizer. Another point of bias/delusion ... we discussed the remains found at Belzec/Chelmno and your best argument was that it ...

... I will find these missing jews. I will find them, and I will document them. If you do that, you have managed what no one else has managed since 1945. Well, if you are correct, 'Ze Germans' found them, murdered them, and blew their remains into the wind, or threw their remains into the river, or ...

My eye is slowly turning back to the east. I had been looking at the 'holocaust of bullets' before ruminating on the refugee reports. From the 'chronology of the holocaust' thread, it became apparent to me that this particular bit of ww2 history needed careful examination. I have only so many hours ...

Ultimately I just want the raw, naked, unvarnished truth. I know what is said to have happened didn't. I want to know what did. It is very difficult to parse the truth from the lies however, certainly 80 years after the fact. This supposes that the information (truth) is actually out there, with eg ...

Ultimately I just want the raw, naked, unvarnished truth. I know what is said to have happened didn't. I want to know what did. It is very difficult to parse the truth from the lies however, certainly 80 years after the fact. This supposes that the information (truth) is actually out there, with eg ...

One can speculate about why, but I think the answer is they just didn't care enough. How prominent was the Jewish Holocaust in Soviet consciousness up until the dissolution of the USSR? :lol: at calling hilberg an outlier, he invented Holocaust studies more or less Thank for reinforcing your ...

One can speculate about why, but I think the answer is they just didn't care enough. How prominent was the Jewish Holocaust in Soviet consciousness up until the dissolution of the USSR?

at calling hilberg an outlier, he invented Holocaust studies more or less

Expert consensus of course, are you saying all those historians and lawyers and witnesses were wrong? See, this is some of the dishonesty I see from the orthodoxy, 4,000,000 was fact or you were a neo nazi anti semite bigot transphobe racist for decades after the war, now 'what do you mean 4,000 ...

Stubble wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:44 am The evidence obviously converged on 4,000,000 at the trial, now it converges on a little over 1,000,000.

/shrug

Pray tell, what's the strongest piece of evidence that converges at 4 million?