The CODOH Revisionist Forum

You fill many gaps with hypothesis. Indeed, your entire history of the Holocaust, is one big gap, where you cannot evidence what happened to millions of Jews in 1944 and 1945. You don't fill it with nonsense, which is what the holocaust is. Even if we haven't "evidenced what happened to them" we ...

Some issues I want to bring up on some revisionist claims on Majdanek. One claim I've heard is that the bottles there are carbon dioxide bottles, not carbon monoxide bottles. However, I recently came across a claim that there are photos showing that the bottles were carbon monoxide. You can view the ...

Secondly, absence of Prussian Blue does not prove that homicidal gassings does not take place and in fact you wouldn't expect that. This is where I get confused with your logic. Why do you think that absence of Prussian Blue is significant? It's like looking for a knife at the crime scene where ...

See also NO-021, discussed in the thread below. It says a large number of Birkenau inmates were unable to work. https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=174 Butz discussed this in Ch 4 of his book. https://www.unz.com/book/arthur_r_butz__the-hoax-of-the-twentieth-century/#p_34_7 Yes, these are ...

One document that has been used by revisionists is a document that doesn't say explicitly but implies that about 21,500 Jews in the camp are unable to work. However, I think there are some flaws with the way many revisionists, including intelligent ones like Mattogno, use it. Sergey Romanov has an ...

I came across this article a while ago: https://ubersoy.com/p/are-jews-white Ultimately, whether you define Jews as "white" comes down to semantics. Leftists aren't entirely wrong when they say that race is a "social construct" in that humans invent constructs to describe reality. The implication ...

The initiation of the conflict will occur through suitable propaganda. Credibility is irrelevant in this case; in victory lies the right. In other words, "we will initiate the conflict via our lies." I personally don't think any of this necessarily implies that they will lie. Propaganda has a bad ...

The same kind of nonsense is in Boehm's version, see the OP on this thread. Also, it's not clear which document you're quoting from; is this 1014-PS or 798-PS? 1014-PS: https://digital.library.cornell.edu/catalog/nur00459 798-PS: https://digital.library.cornell.edu/catalog/nur00458 The quote in ...

I am a little confused on why Callafangers prefers the Second version over the Boehm version. In Udo Walendy's book Who Started World War II and Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof's The War That Had Many Fathers both consider the Boehm version to be less incriminating. Callafangers is going against the ...

SanityCheck wrote:Thanks for shooting the revisionist argument about 'Allied propaganda' in the foot.

Uh no? This shows that despite the doubts and reservations they had about the accuracy of such claims, the fact that they went ahead full bore with it anyway shows how much of a farce it was.

I came across this article responding to Trent Horn:

https://lesteryelten.substack.com/p/ref ... -holocaust

Here's an article on Jewish representation:

https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2020 ... -politics/

For Germany in particular, skip to the chapter on Germany in this book by Richard Lynn:

https://archive.org/details/the-chosen-people-1

The assumption is that he was being deceptive in 100% of his uses of "God", "Lord", etc. It's a very big assumption which evidence about specific lies in unrelated topics doesn't substantiate. I don't think he was deceptive in all of his uses of "God", "Lord", ect. He did believe in God. My ...

I don't think any of the above suggests he was disingenuous in his speeches nor even challenges that he held some Christian faith by the time he became Chancellor and beyond, even if raising questions about his own unique or modified interpretation thereof. We can assume he was only saying it for ...

David Cole has posted this: https://www.givesendgo.com/DavidCole His old book Republican Party Animal got pulled from Amazon. Cole recently got a new publisher to republish it. However, he is only agreeing to have it published if he can also publish a second book "refuting holocaust denial" along ...