Junk Folder for Derails

[Nessie]

Isn't this great? Me and Nessie are working together to prove resettlement!

No, that’s NOT what you are doing together.
I respectfully suggest to you that what you are actually doing is HELPING HER to destroy the function of:
a.) the CODOH forum in general
and
b.) this topic-thread in particular.

She has psychological issues and honesty issues. Don’t feed her!

The two of you are now bullying me, by respectively abusing and mis-gendering me. Both reported. RODOH has died away, and it is no longer an active forum, as bullying went unchecked. Kean and Wahrheitssucher, drove people away. They have been banned from TSF due to their similar behaviour. Please do not ruin this forum.

Kean, I will not join with you, or debate you, about graves. Get over it, accept and stop trolling me. If you do want to discuss another topic and you answer questions, or show evidence, then I will debate you.

Wahrheitssucher, please stop mis-gendering me, and questioning other's intelligence. Try and prove evidence to back up your beliefs and conduct yourself in a respectful manner, as you expect to be treated.

[Callafangers]

The two of you are now bullying me, by respectively abusing and mis-gendering me. Both reported. RODOH has died away, and it is no longer an active forum, as bullying went unchecked.

I find the notion of 'mis-gendering' as some kind of severe offense to be an absurd and invalid 21st century invention.

That said, bullying in general is not something we want to become the norm, so I will agree that all parties involved should tone it down a bit.

I say this every now and then but, Nessie and other 'exterminationist' members acting in reasonably good faith: you are appreciated here, even as we get in heated disagreements and find each other to be morons.

Folks: Wahrheitssucher, Keen, etc. -- while I share your shock and confusion at the ridiculousness that some of our interlocutors exhibit, please try to keep the focus on the argument and not the person and, ideally, avoid the inflammatory use of 'pronouns', even if Nessie may indeed be a pansy at times.

As a reminder, I am not the Sheriff in town here (that would be Archie, unless I am called upon). But I hope that as a member here, we can all work to keep the peace and hopefully make this a more educational (and less emotional/chaotic) experience for everyone.

[Nessie]

Wahrheitssucher and I have history, going back over two other forums. He hated being referred to as a denier, and I complied with a request that I stop using that term. I did so, but then he questioned what gender I was, so I told him I was a he, and he straightaway started to call me a she. That I complied with his request, but he refused to comply with mine, is indicative of his hostility. Look at how he talks about others;

"I genuinely think this is yet another sign of a form of ‘insanity’"
"I suspect the intellectually-challenged one"
"The deeply delusional person"
"The person you named has over many years demonstrated not just b.) but that they have deep mental problems."
"CJ erroneously believes that he/she is “obviously the opposite of a retard”, i.e. a genius.
Demonstrating that CJ is unfortunately a sufferer of Dunning-Kruger syndrome."
"limited intellectual capacity (stupid)"

I could go on, but it is post after post where he claims that others are stupid and delusional. No one else here, or any other forum I have been on, has been as relentless as Wahrheitssucher, in attacking others.

I agree this needs to be stopped, or this forum will slowly be dragged down hill as RODOH was.

[Wahrheitssucher]

The two of you are now… [whiney whinge snipped]…

I find the notion of 'mis-gendering' as some kind of severe offense to be an absurd and invalid 21st century invention.
…while I share your shock and confusion [disgust] at the ridiculousness that some of our interlocutors exhibit, please try to keep the focus on the argument and not the person and, ideally…

This topic-thread has already been derailed.

’Nessie’ is a female name. It’s short for Vanessa.
The mythological lake monster is referred to with the female pronoun.
Don’t pick a female name and then troll discussion forums.

Nessie has NOW made this thread about herself. That is successful ‘trolling’.

I’m not going to use the ‘wrong’ pronoun to satisfy someone with a female user-name who has admitted on the Skeptics forum that her motive is to anonymously disrupt holyH revisionist discussion.

[HansHill]

This topic-thread has already been derailed.

’Nessie’ is a female name. It’s short for Vanessa.
The mythological lake monster is referred to with the female pronoun.
Don’t pick a female name and then troll discussion forums.

Nessie has NOW made this thread about herself. That is successful ‘trolling’.

I’m not going to use the ‘wrong’ pronoun to satisfy someone with a female user-name who has admitted on the Skeptics forum that her motive is to anonymously disrupt holyH revisionist discussion.

1) I have long since suspected Nessie of being a disruptor. Can you share where he said this before?
2) Whats the deal with the Loch Ness Monster avatar? I will give him the benefit of the doubt to assume he doesn't believe in it, but is he a Loch Ness Monster debunker / investigator / survivor etc?

[Nessie]

The two of you are now… [whiney whinge snipped]…

I find the notion of 'mis-gendering' as some kind of severe offense to be an absurd and invalid 21st century invention.
…while I share your shock and confusion [disgust] at the ridiculousness that some of our interlocutors exhibit, please try to keep the focus on the argument and not the person and, ideally…

This topic-thread has already been derailed.

’Nessie’ is a female name. It’s short for Vanessa.
The mythological lake monster is referred to with the female pronoun.
Don’t pick a female name and then troll discussion forums.

The Loch Ness monster is referred to as he, she and it. I have used the monster as my avatar, so there is no connection with its supposed use as a short for Vanessa. I have never come across a female in Scotland called Nessie and I have lived here all of my life.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loch_Ness_Monster

"The Loch Ness Monster (Scottish Gaelic: Uilebheist Loch Nis),[3] known affectionately as Nessie, is a mythical creature in Scottish folklore that is said to inhabit Loch Ness in the Scottish Highlands. It is often described as large, long-necked, and with one or more humps protruding from the water."

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Loch-N ... y-creature

"In April a couple saw an enormous animal—which they compared to a “dragon or prehistoric monster”—and after it crossed their car’s path, it disappeared into the water."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyzxmjj3m2o

"A spokesperson told us: "The Nessie Contingency Plan was produced back in 2001, at a time when there was a lot of Nessie-hunting activity on the loch.
"We were regularly being asked by the media and others what we would do if or when she, or he, was found."

Nessie has NOW made this thread about herself. That is successful ‘trolling’.

You have been asked to use a preferred pronoun, after using this thread to yet to attack me. That was your choice, you made this thread about that. You have a long history of attacking me, over different forums. Those attacks were suggesting I have mental health problems, or am particularly stupid, to which you added deliberate mis-gendering by refusing to use my preferred pronoun.

I’m not going to use the ‘wrong’ pronoun to satisfy someone with a female user-name who has admitted on the Skeptics forum that her motive is to anonymously disrupt holyH revisionist discussion.

In that case, you will be referred to as a Holocaust denier, since you meet the definition;

https://www.ushmm.org/antisemitism/holo ... distortion

"Holocaust denial is any attempt to negate the established facts of the Nazi genocide of European Jews. Holocaust denial and distortion are forms of antisemitism, prejudice against or hatred of Jews. Holocaust denial and distortion generally claim that the Holocaust was invented or exaggerated by Jews as part of a plot to advance Jewish interests."

No where have I admitted my motive is to disrupt discussion. You are lying and the evidence is clear here, that is not the case. On this forum I stick to one section only, I follow the rules and as much as I can, I stay on topic.

[Nessie]

This topic-thread has already been derailed.

’Nessie’ is a female name. It’s short for Vanessa.
The mythological lake monster is referred to with the female pronoun.
Don’t pick a female name and then troll discussion forums.

Nessie has NOW made this thread about herself. That is successful ‘trolling’.

I’m not going to use the ‘wrong’ pronoun to satisfy someone with a female user-name who has admitted on the Skeptics forum that her motive is to anonymously disrupt holyH revisionist discussion.

1) I have long since suspected Nessie of being a disruptor. Can you share where he said this before?

You will find nothing on TSSF or ISF, when I occasionally posted. On RODOH, you will find constant attacks on me by been-there, in exactly the same style of posting as Wahrheitssucher. Scott allowed me to post there for years, so I cannot have been a disruptor as suggested. Plenty of others got banned, when I did not, despite been-there's demands I be removed, or limited from posting. Instead, I was eventually given moderator privileges and a section of the forum of my own. You will see how I behave here, sticking to one part of the forum, and not being abusive, so no disruption there.

2) Whats the deal with the Loch Ness Monster avatar? I will give him the benefit of the doubt to assume he doesn't believe in it, but is he a Loch Ness Monster debunker / investigator / survivor etc?

The first forum I joined was the ISF, after reading Shermer's book on why people believe weird things. I picked Nessie because it Scotland's most famous myth, or hoax and I am Scottish. It just seemed like an appropriate avatar and username for discussing myths and hoaxes.

[HansHill]

You will find nothing on TSSF or ISF, when I occasionally posted. On RODOH, you will find constant attacks on me by been-there, in exactly the same style of posting as Wahrheitssucher. Scott allowed me to post there for years, so I cannot have been a disruptor as suggested. Plenty of others got banned, when I did not, despite been-there's demands I be removed, or limited from posting. Instead, I was eventually given moderator privileges and a section of the forum of my own. You will see how I behave here, sticking to one part of the forum, and not being abusive, so no disruption there.
....
The first forum I joined was the ISF, after reading Shermer's book on why people believe weird things. I picked Nessie because it Scotland's most famous myth, or hoax and I am Scottish. It just seemed like an appropriate avatar and username for discussing myths and hoaxes.

Thank you - As a newbie i feel like I am getting lore drops.

[Keen]

Isn't this great? Me and Nessie are working together to prove resettlement!

No, that’s NOT what you are doing together.
I respectfully suggest to you that what you are actually doing is HELPING HER to destroy the function of:
a.) the CODOH forum in general
and
b.) this topic-thread in particular.

She has psychological issues and honesty issues. Don’t feed her!

How dare you say that about my partner and co-author!

You're just worried that the combination of Nessie & Keen (doesn't that just have a special ring to it?) will be too much for the deniers to handle.

[Keen]

Wahrheitssucher... questioned what gender I was... Look at how he talks about others{me]:

"I genuinely think this is yet another sign of a form of ‘insanity’"
"I suspect the intellectually-challenged one"
"The deeply delusional person"
"The person you named has over many years demonstrated not just b.) but that they have deep mental problems."
"CJ erroneously believes that he/she is “obviously the opposite of a retard”, i.e. a genius.
Demonstrating that CJ is unfortunately a sufferer of Dunning-Kruger syndrome."
"limited intellectual capacity (stupid)"

I could go on...

Please do Nessie, as I'm sure there are many more ways that describe your personality problems.

But rest assured Nessie, after we became partners, I have tried my hardest to not let your personality issues get in the way of us co-authoring the best paper ever written on the resettlement of 1.545 million jews to Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II.

[Keen]

Nessie has NOW made this thread about herself.

Let it go Nessie.

Don't let your gender dysphoria get in the way of your Chelmno research.

[Keen]

How about we co-author a paper on the proof you have of resettlement?

I would like to get this thread back on track.

Nessie and I have teamed up and decided to co-author a paper to submit to the 2026 ARMREG Holocaust Summit, which is now titled (after Nessie's epic fail on Belzec):

The conclusive archaeological / forensic / scientific - PROOF - that refutes, with 100% certainty, the revisionist claim that 1.545 million jews were- NOT - "resettled" in 67 individual "settlements" in Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II

My partner Nessie is going to work on proving that 300,000 jews were resettled in Chelmno (in 21 individual settlements) as I write this, and I am working on a new joint project with Nessie that will take a few days before I can present it here, as I have some other work to do.

Read Nessie's Chelmno resettlement proof and weep deniers!

It can be viewed here:

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=353

Remember Nessie, Stubble asked for "exactly" - so that's what you're going to give him - right?

[Keen]

I know this quiz could be posted here: https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=498 (and it will be)

as it will be included in our co-authored paper, but I"m sure my partner Nessie would like it to have it's own thread.

Nessie's - True. - or - False. - holocaust quiz:

#1 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The USHMM alleges that 600,000 jews were killed in Belzec, 250,000 jews were killed in Sobibor and 925,000 jews were killed in Treblinka II; and Yad Vashem alleges that 300,000 jews were killed in Chelmno and 70,000 jews were killed in Ponary - ??

#2 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; It is alleged in orthodox histriography and/or the media that the remains of the jews who were allegedly killed in those 5 camps currently lie in mass graves within the boundaries of those 5 camps - ??

#3 - Is the following statement of fact - True. - or - False.: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits in question ( http://thisisaboutscience.com/ ) that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY FIVE PEOPLE.

#4 - If your answer to question #3 was - False. - then: The largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits in question ( http://thisisaboutscience.com/ ) that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of no less than - _?_ people.

My partner Nessie will give you her answers in the next post.

[Archie]

I know this quiz could be posted here: https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=498 (and it will be)

as it will be included in our co-authored paper, but I"m sure my partner Nessie would like it to have it's own thread.

Nessie's - True. - or - False. - holocaust quiz:

#1 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The USHMM alleges that 600,000 jews were killed in Belzec, 250,000 jews were killed in Sobibor and 925,000 jews were killed in Treblinka II; and Yad Vashem alleges that 300,000 jews were killed in Chelmno and 70,000 jews were killed in Ponary - ??

#2 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; It is alleged in orthodox histriography and/or the media that the remains of the jews who were allegedly killed in those 5 camps currently lie in mass graves within the boundaries of those 5 camps - ??

#3 - Is the following statement of fact - True. - or - False.: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits in question ( http://thisisaboutscience.com/ ) that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY FIVE PEOPLE.

#4 - If your answer to question #3 was - False. - then: The largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits in question ( http://thisisaboutscience.com/ ) that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of no less than - _?_ people.

My partner Nessie will give you her answers in the next post.

Keen, you don't need to start a bunch of threads all saying the same thing over and over.

Also, stop bumping old threads when you don't have much to add.

[Keen]

Nessie and I will be including the following in our co-written paper:

Nessie's - True. - or - False. - holocaust quiz:

#1 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The USHMM alleges that 600,000 jews were killed in Belzec, 250,000 jews were killed in Sobibor and 925,000 jews were killed in Treblinka II; and Yad Vashem alleges that 300,000 jews were killed in Chelmno and 70,000 jews were killed in Ponary - ??

#2 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; It is alleged in orthodox histriography and/or the media that the remains of the jews who were allegedly killed in those 5 camps currently lie in mass graves within the boundaries of those 5 camps - ??

#3 - Is the following statement of fact - True. - or - False.: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits in question ( http://thisisaboutscience.com/ ) that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY FIVE PEOPLE.

#4 - If your answer to question #3 was - False. - then: The largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits in question ( http://thisisaboutscience.com/ ) that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of no less than - _?_ people.

My partner Nessie will give you her answers in the next post.