Comments on other threads.

[Archie]

Keen, who is Roberta?

roberta is roberto - and roberto is roberta.

It's a heshe thing. You haven't heard about roberto's... uhm... "hobby"?

But who is that? Roberto Muehlenkamp? Do you think Nessie is Muehlenkamp? Oof, that is a serious slap in the face to Muehlenkamp. Those are quite obviously different people.

Reminder: do not misgender other members of the forum. It's immature and makes the forum look bad.

[Keen]

Reminder: do not misgender other members of the forum.

Im not misgendering roberto, I'm simply using the name of its alter ego.

roberto actually misgenders itself.

[Keen]

Hektor:

The run-off-the-mill Joe average thinks that Judaism is 'the religion of the Old Testament' and your church-goer may think "Jews are the chosen people that haven't accepted Jesus

Marching to Zion Documentary:

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r ... 03bd761c8b

What if neither side is right?

What if both sides are full of nut jobs?

[Nessie]

Callafangers;

viewtopic.php?p=24010#p24010

As revisionist views become known and common, the whole question of whether one 'believes' in the Holocaust narrative will come down to just how much weight one places on problematic witness claims and spurious documentation produced amid massive political incentives (and evidenced prevalence of ulterior motives), since all other evidence points the other direction.

What other evidence? Why do no Holocaust so-called revisionist produce an evidenced chronology as to what happened to the Jews in Europe, in particular those arrested by the Nazis and their Allies and sent to camps and ghettos?

Is the future of history really one where certain events are denied to have happened and the topic is just left at that? Will histories be written about what did not happen, rather than what did?

[Keen]

Is the future of history really one where certain events are denied to have happened and the topic is just left at that?

“HUGE MASS GRAVES” are easily identifiable physical entities.

I refuse to believe in the existence of any physical entity that I am not allowed to see.

If you want me to believe, then simply: Show me that which you allege I deny.

What are you waiting for roberto?

What are you so afraid of?

[Nessie]

Hektor;

viewtopic.php?p=24094#p24094

Now, we don't dispute that there were measures on Jews during WW2 by NS-Germany and Axis countries. That's not what the controversy is about. What is in dispute are allegation of
1. Policy to exterminate all or most Jews.
2. Mortally figures during WW2 in the range of 6 million.
3. Usage of unusual execution methods like homicidal gas chambers.

Historical investigations are normally about what happened, not what did not happen. To prove there was no extermination policy, that 6 million did not die and there were no gas chambers, needs evidence to prove there was a resettlement policy, millions of Jews were still alive in 1944-5 and what took place inside the AR camps, Chelmno and the A-B Kremas, instead of gas chambers. Revisionists cannot do that.

[Keen]

To prove there was no extermination policy... needs evidence to prove there was a resettlement policy.

Liar.

BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

Are the remains of 2.145 million Jews really buried in the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves?

(The labeling of asking this legitimate adjudicable question as “hate / antisemitic” is your first clue that they do not want you to know what the answer is.)

OPENING / FUNDAMENTAL STATEMENT OF FACT: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive, unsubstantiated allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the 100 graves in question that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY SIX PEOPLE.

Note: Using the information presented on this website and applying legal standards used in U.S. courts, the above opening / fundamental statement of fact, which is written as, and can be defined as - a rebuttable presumption - can be - LEGALLY - ACCEPTED - AS - TRUE - in a U.S. court.

Foundational scientific question: Can archaeologists prove, with 100% certainty, if millions of pounds of bones and tens of millions of teeth actually exist in a precisely known location?

Foundational legal question: Is it reasonable to doubt that the remains of 2.145 million Jews are actually buried in the 100 specifically and precisely identified locations in question?

Foundational legal principles that easily expose this transparent archaeological hoax: BURDEN OF PRODUCTION & BURDEN OF PERSUASION & BURDEN OF PROOF.

...

If the physical evidence for an alleged crime that - HAS TO EXIST - for the crime to have

actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged crime obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.

Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.

http://thisisaboutscience.com/