Comments on other threads.

A containment zone for disruptive posters
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by HansHill »

To re-iterate for those in the cheap seats: The poster above is ignoring as always, the scale of his claims. He needs in the order of ~800,000 corpses and / or their remains. He has neither.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3946
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Nessie »

TlsMS93 fails to understand evidencing.

viewtopic.php?p=24377#p24377
I hope they have quantified how much ash is in those 2 hectares and determined that it amounts to hundreds of thousands in the alleged number of dead.
Physical quantification would be impossible, as it would involve a massive amount of digging, sifting and disturbing of human remains. The area is large enough to have contained huge mass graves and not coincidentally, the other two AR camps and Chelmno also have large areas of buried cremated remains.
Since none of that was supposedly done, it is expected that we believe the scale through this and the lack of injuries could only have been due to gassing. :D
I believe what is evidenced, which is gassings, mass graves and cremations of hundreds of thousands of Jews. You have decided to not believe that evidence, and so you base your belief on mere opinion.
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3946
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Nessie »

Stubble on context.

viewtopic.php?p=24378#p24378
When you lifted it, you removed all context, they were referring to an area that had been used as a bomb range by the Soviet.
Context is provided by evidence, all the evidence, not just cherry-picked parts. They, as in the 1945 Polish War Crimes investigators, were referring to an area that multiple eyewitnesses had identified to them as the location of the main mass graves, that a 1944 aerial photo showed as disturbed ground. That is further evidenced by the 2011 geophysical evidence. Cherry-picking that the Soviets used explosives when they joined local grave robbers to search for valuables in 1945, is dishonest.
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3946
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Nessie »

HansHill wrote: Thu May 07, 2026 11:14 am To re-iterate for those in the cheap seats: The poster above is ignoring as always, the scale of his claims. He needs in the order of ~800,000 corpses and / or their remains. He has neither.
Between the Lazarette and the main mass grave area of the camp, it is c4 hectares. That is the area shown in the 1944 aerial photo that has disturbed ground and rectangular outlines, sections 2 and 3.

Image

Those are the areas that the eyewitnesses who worked inside the camp state the mass graves were located. It is the same area that the 2011 survey found 11 pits of various sizes.

Image

Not all of the 11 pits will be mass graves, as some are likely where rubbish was dumped. A majority align with where the witnesses locate the mass graves. It is your opinion that area is not large enough to have contained c800,000 corpses. It is my opinion that it is. The difference between our opinions, is that my opinion is backed by the evidence from witnesses, documents and circumstances, that c800,000 people were transported to the camp and the vast majority murdered there. You are wrong to suggest I cannot provide scale to my claims.
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by HansHill »

>You don't have 800,000 corpses
>in my opinion I do!

The absolute state of Holocaust enjoyers.
Post Reply