Comments on other threads.

A containment zone for disruptive posters
User avatar
Eye of Zyclone
Posts: 457
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2025 3:12 pm

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Eye of Zyclone »

Nessie wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2026 8:26 am Read any history of the camp, from online summaries by USHMM and Wikipedia to Dachau, The Official History and you will find that the evidence has been gathered, assessed and insufficient corroborating evidence was found to establish any claims of mass gassing at the camp.
This is a narrative that was concocted after the retractation of the Dachau gas chamber(s) in order to justify the retractation and avoid damaging the credibility of the unretracted fake gas chambers. Pure late damage control. Read any Allied newspaper and official statement from 1945 to 1960 (and even many years later) and you will see that the Dachau gas chamber(s) was (were) described as an undeniable established fact as evidenced as any other alleged Nazi gas chamber. In reality, the Dachau gas chamber used to be the best-proven & most notorious gas chamber of the entire Holohoax myth!! It was even the only "gas chamber" seen in the famous horror movie screened at the Nuremberg show trial in 1945!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Nessie wrote: Sun Jun 14, 2026 8:45 am Evidence was found, primarily from SS camp staff, that there were euthanasia gassings at those camps.
Yes, I know. "Confessing" all kinds of untrue things at the mock trials held by the almighty victors for propaganda purposes was the best defense strategy at that time... :roll:

Image

Image

Image
"Holocaust deniers are very slick people. They justify everything they say with facts and figures."
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 4096
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Nessie »

Eye of Zyclone wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2026 12:00 pm
Nessie wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2026 8:26 am Read any history of the camp, from online summaries by USHMM and Wikipedia to Dachau, The Official History and you will find that the evidence has been gathered, assessed and insufficient corroborating evidence was found to establish any claims of mass gassing at the camp.
This is a narrative that was concocted after the retractation of the Dachau gas chamber(s) in order to justify the retractation and avoid damaging the credibility of the unretracted fake gas chambers. Pure late damage control. Read any Allied newspaper and official statement from 1945 to 1960 (and even many years later) and you will see that the Dachau gas chamber(s) was (were) described as an undeniable established fact as evidenced as any other alleged Nazi gas chamber. In reality, the Dachau gas chamber used to be the best-proven & most notorious gas chamber of the entire Holohoax myth!! It was even the only "gas chamber" seen in the famous horror movie screened at the Nuremberg show trial in 1945!

...
The reason for the retraction, was because war crimes investigators and historians failed to find sufficient evidence to support the original claims and rumours. The camp staff were primarily tried by the Americans, and those staff denied mass gassings.

https://www.expostfacto.nl/dtrr/dtrrintro.html

"From 1945 to 1948, U.S. Army Courts (military commissions and special or general military courts) tried 1672 individuals in 489 proceedings."

According to you, for the hoax you allege to work, the Americans could not get the SS at Dachau to make false confessions to mass gassings at Dachau, but the British who tried Hoess and the Germans and Poles who tried the A-B SS camp staff, were able to get false confessions from them.

Or, the simpler, evidenced reason is that the gas chambers at Dachau were not used, whereas the ones at A-B were.
Nessie wrote: Sun Jun 14, 2026 8:45 am Evidence was found, primarily from SS camp staff, that there were euthanasia gassings at those camps.
Yes, I know. "Confessing" all kinds of untrue things at the mock trials held by the almighty victors for propaganda purposes was the best defense strategy at that time... :roll:

Image

Image

Image
That is an odd way to run a hoax. You would think that no confession would be exposed as false. In fact, the confessions that were proved, were the ones that were corroborated, and the confessions exposed as false were the ones not corroborated, or there was evidence they were false. You don't do evidence, so you do not understand how evidence determines truthfulness and accuracy.
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
K
Keen
Posts: 1526
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Keen »

Eye of Zyclone wrote: Sun Jun 14, 2026 4:37 pm Go and watch the Innocence Project and you will see that testimonies and even confessions don't prove crimes and that testimonies are just series of words without the slightest intrinsic probative value.
Image
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Post Reply