All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps.
Mass graves are proven. By all normal standards of evidencing, they are proven.
As well as this:
I can point to them in the ground.
No matter what the claim is, the burden of proof is on the claimant.
I have never had any issue with accepting the burden of proof.
There is no circumstance in which I reverse the burden of proof.
If you make a claim, it is up to you to prove it. If I make one, it is up to me.
But then, the lying POS was forced to admit this:
nessie:
Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits and that they exist.
But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains.
And now, the lying POS is claiming this:
nessie:
I have spent many posts discussing archaeological surveys of the AR camps that have found large areas of disturbed ground containing buried, cremated remains.
It is a denier lie to minimise the sheer volume of evidence.
The 2011 geophysical site survey, [at T II] found cremated remains on the surface of the ground, during walk over surveys, which were correctly reburied.
So let's see if the lying POS will actually accept its burden of proof:
A - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves / cremation pits in question that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of - at least 2 people. (That is less than one tenth of one one thousandth of one percent of the alleged mass murder.)
Note: The 6 original fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” of Treblinka II that were alleged by “authoritative eyewitnesses” and allegedly - “PROVEN” - to exist in the early show trials - MODEL - MAP - (but never proven to exist), are also included in the above reward offer. (A photo of one of these 6 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” can be seen - HERE.)
Also note: This reward offer, as it applies to Treblinka II, can also be claimed for each 14 pounds of cremains discovered - ANYWHERE - within the camp boundary.
The 2011 geophysical site survey, [at T II] found cremated remains on the surface of the ground, during walk over surveys, which were correctly reburied.
Watch the following video from the 37:40 mark to the 42:40 mark.
In it, the lying pig Colls agrees to collect and rebury all the human remains that she discovers.
So why have we never been told what the quantity / volume of bone fragments discovered was?
Or what size of a "grave" was dug to handle all the human remains found?
Or the location of where they were allegedly buried?
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
The missing Jews are not missing only for Revisionists. They are missing for Orthodoxy too.
Orthodoxy could dispel the missing Jews easily by showing us their remains.
nessie:
That has been done.
A - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves / cremation pits in question that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of - at least 2 people. (That is less than one tenth of one one thousandth of one percent of the alleged mass murder.)
Note: The 6 original fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” of Treblinka II that were alleged by “authoritative eyewitnesses” and allegedly - “PROVEN” - to exist in the early show trials - MODEL - MAP - (but never proven to exist), are also included in the above reward offer. (A photo of one of these 6 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” can be seen - HERE.)
Also note: This reward offer, as it applies to Treblinka II, can also be claimed for each 14 pounds of cremains discovered - ANYWHERE - within the camp boundary.
Time to update nessie's long list of Treblinka II lies:
Caroline Sturdy Colls BEFORE her fraudulent "investigation" of Treblinka II:
CSC:
One of the main aims of this research is to demonstrate the survivability of the remains.
This research will focus upon the search for the physical remains, thus the remains will be identified, recorded.
Caroline Sturdy Colls AFTER her fraudulent "investigation" of Treblinka II:
CSC:
Without intrusive activity, it is not possible to conclusively determine the nature of these pits.
And what does nessie have to say about this?
Nessie, is it - True. - or - False. - that; Non-nefarious diggings for such things as garbage pits, cellars, wells, latrines, septic pits, etc. - were dug at Treblinka II - ??
nessie's answer:
True.
nessie, of the 15 alleged Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question - the one that you can conclusively prove currently contains the most human remains is number: _?_.
nessie's answer:
I don't know.
nessie:
I cannot physically show you mass graves.
Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits and that they exist. But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains.
And what does nessie have to say about Bigfoot and aliens and such:
nessie:
They have been evidenced to not exist, by a failure to find evidence of their existence
* * * * *
nessie:
A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.
nessie, how many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?
I believe the death toll is in the range of 800-900,000.
You doubt and deny the evidence I produce.
Impossible claims and verifiably false details do not prove lying.
The evidence TII was a death camp, far exceeds the evidence it had a different function. Only a determined denier, who has lost grip on reality, will pretend that the corroborating evidence from multiple witnesses who describe mass graves, the aerial photo that shows disturbed ground and rectangular outlines and the site surveys that identified disturbed ground and pits in the areas of the camp that the witnesses said contained the mass graves, is not evidence to prove mass graves.
I am both a trained historian and police officer.
The Nazis were not trying to magically disappear the corpses and the graves.
All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps.
They were not full cremations to ashes at the AR camps either.
Proof, from multiple sources of corroborating evidence, has been produced.
You ignore corroboration. You deny the gathered evidence.
Claiming that multiple pits found by geophysics in the same part of the camp that witnesses state the main mass graves were dug, is not corroborating evidence to prove mass graves, is denial of reality.
The mass graves have not disappeared.
As it stands, there have been two main archaeological surveys of TII.
There is a ton of archaeological evidence proving mass graves.
They are still there. I can point to them in the ground.
No matter what the claim is, the burden of proof is on the claimant.
I have never had any issue with accepting the burden of proof.
There is no circumstance in which I reverse the burden of proof.
If you make a claim, it is up to you to prove it. If I make one, it is up to me.
Mass graves are proven. By all normal standards of evidencing, they are proven.
* * * * *
Two simple foundational questioins for the mentally ill pathological liar:
#1: When you disingenuously use the word "corroboration", do you mean "confirm" or "support"?
#2: When you disingenuously use the word "prove" in alleging that 12 actual "huge mass graves" have actually been proven to actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp (G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54), which of the following standards of proof are you alleging:
Arranged from lowest to highest, the standards of proof in American law follow a rough hierarchy:
Reasonable suspicion: Enough specific facts to justify a brief police stop, but well short of what’s needed for an arrest or a search warrant.
Probable cause: A fair probability that a crime occurred or evidence will be found, sufficient for an arrest or warrant.
Substantial evidence: Enough that a reasonable person could accept it as adequate, used when courts review agency decisions.
Preponderance of the evidence: More likely than not, the default for most civil lawsuits.
Clear and convincing evidence: Highly probable, reserved for civil matters with serious consequences like fraud claims or termination of parental rights.
Beyond a reasonable doubt: Firm conviction of guilt, required for all criminal convictions.
Absolute certainty: A state of knowledge or proof so complete that there is no possibility of doubt or uncertainty
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
