2 "sibs" and a rehashed atrocity story : The genesis of the Nazi-gas-chamber propaganda lie

[Eye of Zyclone]

Google's AI says:

“Sibs” were official rumors manufactured by the British government during World War II as a form of black propaganda and psychological warfare. The term itself is a contraction of sibilare, the Latin verb meaning "to hiss" or "to whisper".

During the war, British intelligence recognized that untraceable whispers could be used as devastating weapons to destroy enemy morale, mislead Axis intelligence, and influence neutral nations. They named these planted rumors "sibs" to evoke the image of a secret whispered or hissed into someone's ear.

1) Sib #1 (December 1940) : Driving a wedge between the German churches and the National Socialist Government of the 3rd Reich

















Context : Since the German churches were the most powerful domestic opponent of the National Socialist authorities and held all human life as sacred on religious grounds, there was zero chance that the agents of Britain's pyschological warfare would not weaponize a euthanasia program implemented by their enemies. In a situation of great chemical warfare anxiety and fearmongering, the gas chamber story was almost a natural outcome. Moreover Pastor Bodelschwingh's institute had been bombed by the Royal Air Force and the Nazi authorities were making anti-British propaganda out of it. The British pyschological warriors therefore countered the future potential negative effects of this propaganda by concocting and planting the story that the Nazis themselves had killed the disabled children their own bombers had just killed at the Bethel institute in Germany.











https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=818


2) Sib#2 (October 1941) : Spreading out the mud that has stuck...














3) A rehashed atrocity story from the Great War (June 1942) : The London Daily Telegraph and the 700,000 victims of German gas chambers... again
























4) More info about "sibs" :

How the "Sib" Machine Worked

The operation was highly organized and coordinated by agencies like the Political Warfare Executive (PWE) and the Underground Propaganda Committee (UPC), which met weekly in London to dream up and approve new rumors.

To be successful, a "sib" had to follow strict psychological rules:

• Untraceable: A good rumor could never be traced back to its official British source.

• Sticky: It had to be compelling enough that people would naturally want to pass it along and exaggerate it ("gain in the telling").

• Plausible yet False: It often mixed real elements of truth with an entirely fabricated narrative to make it believable.

Famous Examples of "Sibs"

The British created and distributed over 8,000 unique rumors throughout the war via secret agents, resistance networks, friendly journalists, and "black" radio stations. Some notable examples included:

• The Man-Eating Sharks: Spreading the rumor that the British military had imported man-eating sharks from Australia into the English Channel to devour any German aviators or invasion troops who fell into the water.

• The Fire Barrage: Whispering that Britain had developed a terrifying secret weapon capable of setting the surface of the sea on fire to burn up invading ships.

[Eye of Zyclone]

3) A rehashed atrocity story from the Great War (June 1942) : The London Daily Telegraph and the 700,000 victims of German gas chambers... again

[Wetzelrad]

Because it was the Daily Telegraph that had the immeasurable moral distinction, in the 1930s, of sticking with Churchill - and publishing his views on Germany - even when they were unfashionable, and when other London newspapers were either refusing his copy or actively promoting appeasement of Hitler.

It was the Telegraph that published his denunciations of Nazism right up until the outbreak of war, and it was Viscount Camrose of the Daily Telegraph who was indispensable to the solution of Churchill's financial problems, setting up the trust that enabled him to continue to live at his beloved Chartwell.

This lays out the beginning of WWII as if it were a financial transaction. Also, a media operation.
1) Britain was largely against war, except for The Telegraph.
2) Churchill fomented for war, in The Telegraph, and especially with the financial backing of Camrose and others.
3) They eventually succeeded in changing Britain's views and setting off the war.

[Wetzelrad]

So The Daily Telegraph helped start the gas chamber rumors. Probably moreso than any other media outlet.

This is important because The Telegraph is still using atrocity propaganda today. The following are some absolutely false atrocity stories they've pushed recently, all as part of their efforts to justify wars for Jewish interests:

"Assad regime ‘buried 100,000 bodies in mass grave’"

"Iron body presses and bed clamps: horrors of Syria’s ‘slaughterhouse’ prison emerges"

"Hamas massacres babies and children"

"Israeli forces discovered bodies of dead infants as they surveyed the Kfar Aza kibbutz"

"Israel publishes picture of baby murdered by Hamas"
"Israeli military officials have confirmed that babies and children were indeed murdered – and beheaded – during the Hamas massacre."

It's easy enough to invent stories wholecloth and force them on the public, but the lies land better if you can point to real, ordinary objects like excavators, bulldozers, ropes, a hydraulic press, or delousing chambers, and misportray them as devices for mass murder.

[Eye of Zyclone]

Because it was the Daily Telegraph that had the immeasurable moral distinction, in the 1930s, of sticking with Churchill - and publishing his views on Germany - even when they were unfashionable, and when other London newspapers were either refusing his copy or actively promoting appeasement of Hitler.

It was the Telegraph that published his denunciations of Nazism right up until the outbreak of war, and it was Viscount Camrose of the Daily Telegraph who was indispensable to the solution of Churchill's financial problems, setting up the trust that enabled him to continue to live at his beloved Chartwell.

This lays out the beginning of WWII as if it were a financial transaction. Also, a media operation.
1) Britain was largely against war, except for The Telegraph.
2) Churchill fomented for war, in The Telegraph, and especially with the financial backing of Camrose and others.
3) They eventually succeeded in changing Britain's views and setting off the war.

4) The victors (i.e. those who write history, as the saying goes) proclaimed that their own war propaganda was the truth and their own warmongers had been all along great psychics with supernatural insights into the future and the alleged dangerousness and wickedness of the vanquished. Or in other words, as some Zionist propagandists put it when the Allied press could at last portray typhus victims as mass murder victims to fool the world, "so it was true"...