Where'd They Go? (An inverted question from exterminationists)

[Keen]

The answer is that supposed resettlement was just a fog screen created by the Nazis

Strawman.

Who says the Germans "resettled" jews in the east?

[Keen]

Evidence from a document is insufficient. You need more evidence than that

Where is your evidence of millions of Jews the Nazis and their allies arrested 1939-44, still alive in 1944?

Strawman.

Who says that the "jews the Nazis and their allies arrested 1939-44, were still alive in 1944?"

[Keen]

You're just stating your assumptions, it's not really much to respond to.

It's like me having a post where I'm like, the physical evidence shows that there was mass burial and body destruction and I leave it that.

That's exactly what you and the other low IQ reality deniers have been doing here since the beginning.

[Keen]

Stop smoking crack, and think for a minute.

Human bodies are not liquid, jelly etc.

They are irregular shapes, they are not ideal stacking material.

It just goes to show how low the IQ's of people like bombsaway are when you have to explain things like that to them.

They truly are retarded.

[Nessie]

Evidence from a document is insufficient. You need more evidence than that

Where is your evidence of millions of Jews the Nazis and their allies arrested 1939-44, still alive in 1944?

Strawman.

Who says that the "jews the Nazis and their allies arrested 1939-44, were still alive in 1944?"

Holocaust so-called revisionists do, since they claim millions were not murdered and buried at various camps. If they were not murdered, it stands to reason they lived. Or, have you got a different cause of death, so that millions arrested 1939-44, did not live to 1944?

[Nessie]

The answer is that supposed resettlement was just a fog screen created by the Nazis

Strawman.

Who says the Germans "resettled" jews in the east?

The Germans did;

viewtopic.php?p=15563#p15563

"Quote from his testimony: "I have no recollection that the extermination of the Jews was mentioned at the conference. The term 'Final Solution' referred to evacuation to the East."

[Keen]

Evidence from a document is insufficient. You need more evidence than that

Where is your evidence of millions of Jews the Nazis and their allies arrested 1939-44, still alive in 1944?

Strawman.

Who says that the "jews the Nazis and their allies arrested 1939-44, were still alive in 1944?"

Holocaust so-called revisionists do, since they claim millions were not murdered and buried at various camps. If they were not murdered, it stands to reason they lived. Or, have you got a different cause of death, so that millions arrested 1939-44, did not live to 1944?

Strawman.

It is not a claim that 2.075 jews were NOT murdered and buried at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treablinka II.

It is a proven fact: http://thisisaboutscience.com/

[Keen]

Or, have you got a different cause of death

Yes: http://thisisaboutscience.com/

[Keen]

The term 'Final Solution' referred to evacuation to the East."

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The Germans rounded up jews in Europe and transited them east?

If your answer is - True. - then; Where exactly did they end up?

[Nessie]

Strawman.

Who says that the "jews the Nazis and their allies arrested 1939-44, were still alive in 1944?"

Holocaust so-called revisionists do, since they claim millions were not murdered and buried at various camps. If they were not murdered, it stands to reason they lived. Or, have you got a different cause of death, so that millions arrested 1939-44, did not live to 1944?

Strawman.

It is not a claim that 2.075 jews were NOT murdered and buried at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treablinka II.

It is a proven fact: http://thisisaboutscience.com/

If 2.075 Jews were NOT murdered and buried at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and TII, then where were they in 1944?

[Keen]

Holocaust so-called revisionists do, since they claim millions were not murdered and buried at various camps. If they were not murdered, it stands to reason they lived. Or, have you got a different cause of death, so that millions arrested 1939-44, did not live to 1944?

Strawman.

It is not a claim that 2.075 jews were NOT murdered and buried at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treablinka II.

It is a proven fact: http://thisisaboutscience.com/

If 2.075 Jews were NOT murdered and buried at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and TII, then where were they in 1944?

Somewhere other than Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II.

Which is a fact that has not only been proven: http://thisisaboutscience.com/

But can also be LEGALLY established as fact in a U.S. court.

[Nessie]

....

If 2.075 Jews were NOT murdered and buried at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and TII, then where were they in 1944?

Somewhere other than Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II.

....

That is not a good enough answer. Try again. Your failure to evidence where they went, will be taken as an admission by you, that somehow, they were all still inside those camps, in 1944.

[Keen]

That is not a good enough answer.

Yes it is.

Your failure to evidence where they went, will be taken as an admission by you, that somehow, they were all still inside those camps, in 1944.

No it's not.

You truly are retarded Sergay.

If you knew where they are, you wouldn't need to ask where they went.

It's so simple that a retard could understand it.



But Sergay can't!

[Stubble]

If you knew where they are, you wouldn't need to ask where they went.

If I understand the opposing perspective, opinion is that liquid sub compact persons were poured into the grave space and then cremated of their own volition after introduction of a flame.

From the writing that I've read on the subject, this appears to be the consensus.

Remarkably, liquid concentrations of persons above 20/m^3 are seen as completely acceptable and no further comment is deemed necessary.

Pictures illustrating that the internees did not weight 77lbs per, mean nothing.

In short, they claim the dead are in the dirt at the Bug River camps, and no amount of photographs of empty grave space and clean sand will sway their opinion.

[Nessie]

That is not a good enough answer.

Yes it is.

Not to any historian, lawyer, journalist it is. Any true investigator, finds out what happened, or else they have weakened their claim that something did not happen to the point it can be dismissed.

Your failure to evidence where they went, will be taken as an admission by you, that somehow, they were all still inside those camps, in 1944.

No it's not.

Yes it is, since if there is no evidence they left, then it stands to reason they are still there. Do you not understand basic logic?