Treblinka/Malkinia and the Missing Witness Statements

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 2239
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Treblinka/Malkinia and the Missing Witness Statements

Post by Stubble »

Callafangers wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 5:10 pm
Stubble wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 12:34 pm
Seriously though, this highlights 2 things for me. One thing is that testimonies were selectively archived and the other is that the mundane, generally speaking, didn't make it in to the record.
This is a key point which Nessie regularly enjoys ignoring.

"Why don't we have testimony of Jews exiting trains?"
"Why don't we have testimony about a small, boring property sorting camp?"
"Why don't we have testimony about Jews in any particular camp, out of thousands?"


Nessie thinks these are his roaring 'gotcha' questions, but they just speak to his lack of common sense. Records and testimonies don't even exist for as massive a location as the Malkinia camp pictured in the OP. We know from that photo alone that people woke up, ate breakfast, lived, worked, traveled through, took naps, had friends, got in fights, got deloused, received medical care, etc., etc. at the buildings shown in that photograph. Yet not a word from historians on what even happened there. Despite this, Nessie thinks we should be able to provide testimony about a far smaller camp, T-II, even further off the main thoroughfare.

Nessie thinks this because Nessie has nothing else to lean on. The 'Holocaust' house of cards is crumbling fast.


And the camp pictured was a military asset at the rail line changeover and would have represented a liability had it fallen to the Soviet and thus was erased. Not to conceal evidence, but to deny an asset to the enemy.

When you say this about the Bug River camps, the exterminationist incredulity knows no bounds...

/shrug
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: Treblinka/Malkinia and the Missing Witness Statements

Post by bombsaway »

The witness statement about the camp is this
In 1941–1942 there was a transit camp in Małkinia for the Jewish population, set up by Germans in the eastern part of the town, along Nurska Street. According to memories, it was under the open sky[1.9]. It is known that terrible conditions prevailed there, and people stayed in pits dug in the frozen ground.[1.10].
The camp so confidently stated as Malkinia transit camp by Nazgul and Callafangers, is not "along Nurska Street", and also west of the city, which is why PR pointed to another location for it.

These sort of unsupported inferences (the whole basis of this thread) is why revisionism is not taken seriously. It's rampant and IMO the source of the historical delusions.

I have no idea what the camp in the photo is. It might be Malkinia transit camp, but there's no evidence to suggest it was.
User avatar
Callafangers
Administrator
Posts: 758
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:25 am

Re: Treblinka/Malkinia and the Missing Witness Statements

Post by Callafangers »

bombsaway wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2025 6:48 pm The witness statement about the camp is this
In 1941–1942 there was a transit camp in Małkinia for the Jewish population, set up by Germans in the eastern part of the town, along Nurska Street. According to memories, it was under the open sky[1.9]. It is known that terrible conditions prevailed there, and people stayed in pits dug in the frozen ground.[1.10].
The camp so confidently stated as Malkinia transit camp by Nazgul and Callafangers, is not "along Nurska Street", and also west of the city, which is why PR pointed to another location for it.

These sort of unsupported inferences (the whole basis of this thread) is why revisionism is not taken seriously. It's rampant and IMO the source of the historical delusions.

I have no idea what the camp in the photo is. It might be Malkinia transit camp, but there's no evidence to suggest it was.
bombsaway, this means you have not one but two camps which are both evidenced and missing any official history.

This speaks volumes to the lack of reasonable expectation of a 'non-Holocaust' counter-narrative at T-II.

So much for "revisionists can't explain what else happened at this obscure, trivial camp south of Malkinia... Therefore, the liars are correct and the largest cremation event in history which lacks forensic evidence (corpses) and fuel/wood must have happened!"
...he cries out in pain and proceeds to AI-slop-spam and 'pilpul' you...
Post Reply