Majdanek this and that

A revisionist safe space
User avatar
InuYasha
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2025 7:27 am

Re: Majdanek this and that

Post by InuYasha »

Fred Ziffel wrote: Sun Jun 08, 2025 12:10 am Here is what I found in regard to this even of no GCs at Majdanek
Yes, this is the same excerpt from the 1950 Berlin court ruling that is linked above. The original German text also states that there were apparently no gas chambers in Majdanek. Apparently, the narrative was changed at some point between the Berlin and Dusseldorf trials.

It is not surprising, since in the 1950s, instead of the current idea of ​​death camps in Poland, there was another: that all camps, including those in Germany and Austria, were death camps. Under such conditions, it was possible to afford a "non-gas" Majdanek. Everything changed after Martin Broschat's statement in 1960, so the first mentions of a GC in Majdanek probably date back to the period between 1960 and 1981.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.
(c) JFK
B
Booze
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2025 11:35 pm

Re: Majdanek this and that

Post by Booze »

InuYasha wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 11:29 am
Booze wrote: Thu Jun 05, 2025 8:58 pm InuYasha please give your source
The documents themselves from the Düsseldorf regional courts and the ruling of June 30, 1981 can be found on a German legal website, it should be on one of the pages there:
https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/r ... 0Ks%201/75

The exact mention that there were no gas chambers in Majdanek is contained in point 6 of the indictment of Berlin land court (1950, during first Sobibor trial):
https://junsv.nl/seiten?tx_junsv_pi2%5B ... ca6fbbad6d

The original definition states:
"6. Transport aus Maidanek.

Einmal kam ein Transport jüdischer Häftlinge in einer Stärke von ungefähr 15000 Mann aus dem Lager Maidanek, das keine Vergasungsanlage besass, zum Vergasen an.".

It can be translated as:
"6. Transport from Maidanek.

On one occasion, a transport of Jewish prisoners, approximately 15,000 strong, arrived from the Maidanek camp, which had no gassing facility, to be gassed."

It turns out that, according to the original version, there were no gas chambers in Majdanek.

At what point did the Zionists and exterminationists include the gassings in Majdanek in the Holocaust narrative?
Thx
What I'm asking is what source (book or other) led you to this or is this your original research?
User avatar
InuYasha
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2025 7:27 am

Re: Majdanek this and that

Post by InuYasha »

Booze wrote: Sun Jun 08, 2025 8:54 am
InuYasha wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 11:29 am
Booze wrote: Thu Jun 05, 2025 8:58 pm InuYasha please give your source
The documents themselves from the Düsseldorf regional courts and the ruling of June 30, 1981 can be found on a German legal website, it should be on one of the pages there:
https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/r ... 0Ks%201/75

The exact mention that there were no gas chambers in Majdanek is contained in point 6 of the indictment of Berlin land court (1950, during first Sobibor trial):
https://junsv.nl/seiten?tx_junsv_pi2%5B ... ca6fbbad6d

The original definition states:
"6. Transport aus Maidanek.

Einmal kam ein Transport jüdischer Häftlinge in einer Stärke von ungefähr 15000 Mann aus dem Lager Maidanek, das keine Vergasungsanlage besass, zum Vergasen an.".

It can be translated as:
"6. Transport from Maidanek.

On one occasion, a transport of Jewish prisoners, approximately 15,000 strong, arrived from the Maidanek camp, which had no gassing facility, to be gassed."

It turns out that, according to the original version, there were no gas chambers in Majdanek.

At what point did the Zionists and exterminationists include the gassings in Majdanek in the Holocaust narrative?
Thx
What I'm asking is what source (book or other) led you to this or is this your original research?
I first saw this information in a book about Sobibor by Jurgen Graf, Thomas Kues and Carlo Mattogno. Later I became interested in such an obvious contradiction in the whole "great hoax" and decided to find archival documents of German courts in order to refer to the conclusions of the "prosecutors" themselves, and not to the revisionists, since the exterminationists can say that the information was taken selectively by the revisionists. As I expected, the German courts actually admitted in 1950 that de facto there were no gas chambers in Majdanek.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.
(c) JFK
B
Booze
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2025 11:35 pm

Re: Majdanek this and that

Post by Booze »

InuYasha wrote: Sun Jun 08, 2025 11:12 am I first saw this information in a book about Sobibor by Jurgen Graf, Thomas Kues and Carlo Mattogno. Later I became interested in such an obvious contradiction in the whole "great hoax" and decided to find archival documents of German courts in order to refer to the conclusions of the "prosecutors" themselves, and not to the revisionists, since the exterminationists can say that the information was taken selectively by the revisionists. As I expected, the German courts actually admitted in 1950 that de facto there were no gas chambers in Majdanek.
Thx for your reply, I had a curiosity about how that came about.
Ideally the document itself and an accompanying translation would be included in their book or in German Rudolph's Holocaust Encyclopedia.
I say that because I do agree that exterminations will just simply claim it to be false, and I do agree that it can provide a very powerful argument for revisionists.
Post Reply