The Korherr Report

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2035
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: The Korherr Report

Post by Nessie »

Google translation of the letter Korherr sent to Der Spiegle;

https://fpp.co.uk/History/General/Korhe ... 50777.html

"SPIEGEL, No. 31, 25. July 1977, pp. 12 :
THE well-known, racially persecuted writer H. G. Adler, formerly in Prague, now in London, wrote in 1960 in the preface to the second edition of his extraordinary book "Theresienstadt 1941--1945": "It was also expressly stated that the name Dr. Korherrs as a 'SS statistician' ... is not true, since he never belonged to the SS and has been rehabilitated for his behavior in the years of National Socialism."
The SPIEGEL unfortunately publishes the claim of the English historian Irving that I had calculated on Himmler's order in the spring of 1943 the number of victims of Judaism. In fact, these information was delivered by the Reich Security Main Office (RSHA) fix and finished with the text with the condition to be allowed to change no number and no word.
The statement that I also had listed that more than a million Jews died in the camps of the General Government and Warthegau through special treatment is also incorrect. I must protest against the word 'died' in this context.
It was precisely the word "special treatment" that led me to the telephone inquiry at the RSHA, which this word had to mean. I got the answer that it was Jews who were based in the Lublin district.
Braunschweig
Dr. Richard Korherr"

Korherr was lied to, as there is no evidence over a million Jews being resettled around Lublin in 1943.
b
bombsaway
Posts: 976
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: The Korherr Report

Post by bombsaway »

The extant Korherr report is not in itself direct Holocaust evidence. But the surrounding material around the report, the information Korherr received about Jews being kept in Lublin, Himmler's correction all point to that aspect (what evacuation entailed) being ambiguous.
The Reichsfuehrer SS has received your report about "The Final
Solution of the Jewish Problem". He does ,not want any reference to be
made anywhere to "Special Treatment of the Jews". Page 9, Section 4 must
read as follows:
"Transport of Jews from the Eastern provinces
to the Russian East:
Processed through
the camps in the Government-General
the camps in the Warthegau ...................... "
Other descriptions may not be used.
So Korherr was originally told they were given "special treatment", a self-evident code word commonly used to denote killing operations, see EG reports.
b
borjastick
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 11:49 am
Location: Europe

Re: The Korherr Report

Post by borjastick »

bombsaway wrote: Wed Jul 02, 2025 12:57 pm
borjastick wrote: Wed Jul 02, 2025 9:41 am Why is there some difficulty understanding that people who have moved to another 'continent' does not mean that those who chose to stay or couldn't leave for whatever reason are dead?

The word 'evacuate' is not difficult to understand though it could have various levels of weight to it in different languages. Eg. in French the word question is 'demand' which suggest something far stronger than a simple request or basic question or enquiry.

In the second world war youngsters including my mother were 'evacuated' away from larger towns and cities into the countryside for safety. The were not killed.
If it was a hundred million people that had been supposedly evacuated and maintained in an area without a single piece of information (even a rumor) being generated by this mass population movement, would you believe it happened?
Ah I see the exaggeration technique there mate. A common ply and one used regularly by Nessie.

There were no 100m so what on earth are you talking about.

We are talking about several million people across a vast swathe of land in many countries during war time and controlled by Communists. Please get a grip old chap.
Of the four million jews under German control, six million died and five million survived!
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2035
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: The Korherr Report

Post by Nessie »

borjastick wrote: Thu Jul 03, 2025 6:33 am ...

Ah I see the exaggeration technique there mate. A common ply and one used regularly by Nessie.
Please provide an example of that.
There were no 100m so what on earth are you talking about.

We are talking about several million people across a vast swathe of land in many countries during war time and controlled by Communists. Please get a grip old chap.
If 1.2 million Jews were being accommodated in the east, who had gone there via the AR camps, that would leave evidence. Yet, despite years of searching, so-called revisionists have none. The main attempt to find evidence was by Thomas Kues, and he failed. You cannot name the department responsible for resettlement, or any Nazi who worked there, who would have been sure to talk about their work and provide valuable evidence.
Post Reply