Nessie wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 7:12 pm
Scepticism should be about the accurate checking of claims, to establish if they are correct or not. The so-called revisionists here, are not able to accurately check the evidence.
100%
Sometimes they point out weaknesses or tiny flaws in the existing and accepted evidence base but they almost never fully debunk any source despite claiming that they did
A good example of that is about the supposed use of diesel engines.
So Nessie is skeptical about the "eyewitness" claims that the Germans used diesel engines to gas people.
If the evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then the claim is obviously false.