Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 725
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by HansHill »

Nessie wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 5:17 pm they
Why did you call me "they" when I'm clearly a man
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2212
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by Nessie »

HansHill wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 5:43 pm
Nessie wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 5:17 pm they
Why did you call me "they" when I'm clearly a man
Because I was referring to you as part of a group. That group is so-called revisionists, who cannot revise, because they bring no evidence to the debate. In this case, no archaeological evidence to prove the ground in the southern end of TII is largely undisturbed.
User avatar
TlsMS93
Posts: 688
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 11:57 am

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by TlsMS93 »

Nessie wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 5:34 pm
If archaeologists found large areas of buried cremated remains, items from SS guards and people from various countries, that suggested many were Jewish, some demolished buried buildings, in what was a camp, that had then planted over, with no other information, they would conclude it was most likely the scene of a crime that was being covered-up. That the camps had had railway lines into them, would also suggest people had been transported there and died. The finds of some corpses of guards, who had been shot, would suggest fighting at the camp.

There is enough evidence, from archaeology alone, to suggest foul play and many dead.
So the concentration camps of the American Civil War were also extermination camps, but no one claims that. In the case of Treblinka, what we have is a clandestine narrative that subsequently created this image in certain camps. What idiocy: the first gas chambers at Treblinka II were unfit for service, because those at Belzec and Sobibor were supposedly more than enough to purge the General Government in a matter of months.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2212
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by Nessie »

TlsMS93 wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 6:17 pm
Nessie wrote: Wed Jul 16, 2025 5:34 pm
If archaeologists found large areas of buried cremated remains, items from SS guards and people from various countries, that suggested many were Jewish, some demolished buried buildings, in what was a camp, that had then planted over, with no other information, they would conclude it was most likely the scene of a crime that was being covered-up. That the camps had had railway lines into them, would also suggest people had been transported there and died. The finds of some corpses of guards, who had been shot, would suggest fighting at the camp.

There is enough evidence, from archaeology alone, to suggest foul play and many dead.
So the concentration camps of the American Civil War were also extermination camps, but no one claims that. In the case of Treblinka, what we have is a clandestine narrative that subsequently created this image in certain camps. What idiocy: the first gas chambers at Treblinka II were unfit for service, because those at Belzec and Sobibor were supposedly more than enough to purge the General Government in a matter of months.
Name a site, from any war, anywhere in the world, that is like the AR camps, with buried cremated remains, some corpses of soldiers that show they were shot dead, demolished buried buildings, a railway line into it, and it has been planted over.

You cannot, they are unique. The archaeological evidence alone, is enough to prove it was a site where people died in the most suspicious circumstances.
User avatar
TlsMS93
Posts: 688
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 11:57 am

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by TlsMS93 »

What's unique is wanting to cremate 800,000 bodies without fuel. Having trains near the German-Soviet demarcation line with their different track gauges is no big deal; it only strengthens Germany's foreign policy of deporting Jews to occupied Soviet territories. If there are no records of Jews in the USSR beyond what they already had in 1939, blame the Soviets and their closed system and misinformation. I want you to give me the 1.7 million Jews buried or the alleged amount of ashes for these Reinhardt camps. You won't give us that because there isn't even close to a fraction of the alleged amount.

All these extras: the railway, the sorting and delousing facilities, the remains of cremations of people who died en route or from disease, the risk of groundwater contamination—none of this constitutes genocide.

If I were given a directive from Hitler ordering such extermination, we wouldn't even discuss any of it, nor would I need to show camps or investigate anything. But there's no sign of it, not even in ministerial bodies that would have this carbon copy somewhere.
Post Reply