HansHill wrote: ↑Sat Aug 09, 2025 9:59 am
...
I actually agree with Nessie on his first paragraph here that Chemistry can only do so much. And what it
has done is given us a
vision which is scientifically cohesive and sound, to support the assertion "these rooms were not used for homicidal gassings".
That is what the lower than expected levels suggest, but, as you correctly identify, chemistry can only do so much. It is wrong to conclude therefore no gassings, just from the chemistry, especially when there is so much evidence that gassings took place.
The chemistry does indeed give us this "cause" to get behind. When I am explaining this in my own life IRL to normal, non-jewish and non-holocaust activists who can think critically, I describe this as the offramp to creating a cohesive vision of the world by adding together various aspects.
Except that go on to X and I presume other places where denial takes place, and there are plenty of people who argue that the evidence of gas chambers inside the Kremas, proves they were used for delousing. Thus, there is no cohesion from so-called revisionists. They are completely split, contradicting each other.
By creating this vision I usually begin with the chemistry and next highlight the Kula Columns. We are off to a good start here, too because not only has nobody in the real world even heard of a Kula Column, but they cannot even be demonstrated to exist or make sense. Next are the holes, and another incredibly strong position for the revisionists as they don't exist.
The presence of mesh, wire columns, inside the Kremas, used to drop Zyklon B into, is evidenced by eyewitnesses and a document. The holes on the Krema roofs have been identified and for Kremas II and III, there are the aerial photos and for Krema II, the train photo. There is also eyewitness evidence for the holes.
What you assert is a strong position, is merely your assertions that evidence somehow, does not exist, or make sense.
By the end of this string of rhetoric, the revisionist vision of the world looks something like this, as pieced together by:
We have a B&W Polaroid given to us by the chemistry that HcN was never present there
But, it was present...
We added color to our Polaroid by the absence of Kula Columns meaning no murder weapon
The columns are evidenced.
We added sound by the absence of holes and again no murder weapon
The holes are evidenced.
We add 360 degree 4k resolution IMAX by analyzing the corpse disposal
And finally we turn our vision into a feature length Blockbuster by analyzing the fabrications and contradictions of the witnesses and Allies.
We don't have a "Blockbuster" without the chemistry, and as Nessie rightly said, if PB did form it would be game over for this vision before it even goes any where. In the end, not only is this vision of the world entirely cohesive and internally consistent, it is upheld by the chemistry in the very first instance.
In my experience this is a powerful way to explain this topic to interested White people, and especially at a time like this where everybody (and mostly Whites) is absolutely disgusted by the evil and immoral actions of these Zionists and Jewish /Holocaust activists in the world today. So yes slightly off-topic as Nazgul highlighted but I just wanted to center Nessie's post in the "why" chemistry is both limited but critically valuable.
A real blockbuster would be for you to trace evidence of people who worked inside the Kremas, who state they were not used for gassings and what did happen, or documents recording the transportation of people not selected for work, back out of the camp. Until you can actually revise the history of Birkenau and the Kremas, with evidence, you do not have a blockbuster.
Instead, you have little footnotes, like the low levels of HCN, that give you apparent footholds on which to base a denial, not a revision, of the gassing narrative.
i've been told my output sometimes needs tight editing and now I see why