Callafangers wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 7:16 am
Nessie wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 6:40 am
The drawing and museum description do not describe a bone mill. You would not find any other evidence that you did not want to believe, credible. Your default position is to deny.
My default position is to inquire.
Or, to ask others to inquire for you, which I did.
But once a healthy skepticism develops after observing an extraordinary pattern of conspiracy and lies then, yes, you will see that I am more inclined to object to the validity of weak and inadequate evidence for extraordinary claims than, say, you are.
The extraordinary pattern, is the revisionist claim that 100% of the eyewitnesses lied. Nazi and Jew, German, Polish, French, Hungarian and Greeks all conspired together and not one single person who worked at the Kremas, has told the truth.
Your position by necessity is one which has to keep pretending that the pool of witnesses has not "cried wolf" so often as to demonstrate the existence of a coordinated, false narrative with obvious motives and extraordinary [post-war victorious] means.
Your pretend position is to claim that 100% of the eyewitnesses lied, for which you have only your doubts, rather than evidence to prove.
It is you who "wants to believe". This is why your standards for evidence (and critical examination thereof) are so very low.
I apply the same evidencing standard to all historical events, including the Holocaust. You ignore all the studies of witness behaviour, memory and recall, as your agenda is to deny 100% of the eyewitness evidence. Instead of evidencing lying, you allege it with illogical arguments.
