Where'd They Go? (An inverted question from exterminationists)

[bombsaway]

The dead don't fit as a liquid Bombsaway...

They don't fit, as a liquid...

Let that sink in...

That is insane.

eg

If 400k were buried there, that would necessitate around 20 bodies per cubic meter, around 80% packing density, not factoring in all these other variables in bold which would further reduce volume demands.

https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=15434#p15434

I've pointed this out to you.

[Stubble]

The dead don't fit as a liquid Bombsaway...

They don't fit, as a liquid...

Let that sink in...

That is insane.

eg

If 400k were buried there, that would necessitate around 20 bodies per cubic meter, around 80% packing density, not factoring in all these other variables in bold which would further reduce volume demands.

https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=15434#p15434

I've pointed this out to you.

Stop smoking crack, and think for a minute.

Human bodies are not liquid, jelly etc.

They are irregular shapes, they are not ideal stacking material.

FFS.

20/m^3 @80% packing efficiency...

GTFO and stop doing drugs.

Also, still not the claim...

The only way you are going to get 20/m^3 is as a liquid and even then only just...

[bombsaway]

The dead don't fit as a liquid Bombsaway...

They don't fit, as a liquid...

Let that sink in...

That is insane.

eg

If 400k were buried there, that would necessitate around 20 bodies per cubic meter, around 80% packing density, not factoring in all these other variables in bold which would further reduce volume demands.

https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=15434#p15434

I've pointed this out to you.

Stop smoking crack, and think for a minute.

Human bodies are not liquid, jelly etc.

They are irregular shapes, they are not ideal stacking material.

FFS.

20/m^3 @80% packing efficiency...

GTFO and stop doing drugs.

Also, still not the claim...

You said they don't fit as a liquid. This is what I am calling an insane comment. It's blatantly wrong, so why say it? And at Chelmno and Sobibor that packing density necessary would be much lower (at Chelmno - half)

[Stubble]

That is insane.

eg



https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=15434#p15434

I've pointed this out to you.

Stop smoking crack, and think for a minute.

Human bodies are not liquid, jelly etc.

They are irregular shapes, they are not ideal stacking material.

FFS.

20/m^3 @80% packing efficiency...

GTFO and stop doing drugs.

Also, still not the claim...

You said they don't fit as a liquid. This is what I am calling an insane comment. It's blatantly wrong, so why say it? And at Chelmno and Sobibor that packing density necessary would be much lower (at Chelmno - half)

https://search.brave.com/search?q=how+m ... 611dd735b7

If you assume 1/3 children, and you do, then only just.

Around 16 people will fit as a liquid if they are adults...

FFS...

600,000 people don't fit as a liquid. With your insane assumptions about children and liquification, you might be able to cram 20/m^3...to get your 400k

You say it authoritatively too, and you say 'that's only 80% packing efficiency'.

Stop smoking crack.

[bombsaway]

Stop smoking crack, and think for a minute.

Human bodies are not liquid, jelly etc.

They are irregular shapes, they are not ideal stacking material.

FFS.

20/m^3 @80% packing efficiency...

GTFO and stop doing drugs.

Also, still not the claim...

You said they don't fit as a liquid. This is what I am calling an insane comment. It's blatantly wrong, so why say it? And at Chelmno and Sobibor that packing density necessary would be much lower (at Chelmno - half)

https://search.brave.com/search?q=how+m ... 611dd735b7

If you assume 1/3 children, and you do, then only just.

Around 16 people will fit as a liquid if they are adults...

FFS...

600,000 people don't fit as a liquid. With your insane assumptions about children and liquification, you might be able to cram 20/m^3...

You say it authoritatively too, and you say 'that's only 80% packing efficiency'.

Stop smoking crack.

There's no reason to believe the number was 600,000. You want to assume it because of your MO, unconscious I would say, to violently strawman the mainstream narrative.

That packing density is what Archie gave, 35 kg per person. Children were heavily represented and these inhabitants were starving. That number (average weight) might even be lower.

The density is also not achieved instantly, like all 430,000 were buried simultaneously. Your calculations are G O O F Y.

[Stubble]

You assume liquid corpses and no grave cap.

That's 'goofy'...

[bombsaway]

You assume liquid corpses and no grave cap.

That's 'goofy'...

This is up for discussion. What isn't is your statement that they wouldn't fit, liquified.

[Stubble]

Dude, they don't...

Looking at 'The Stroop Collection' the people in the ghetto sure don't look like they weigh 77lbs on average...

Various images from different collections;

Krakow


Plonsk




Warsaw


Vilna


77lbs...

[bombsaway]

Dude, they don't...

Looking at 'The Stroop Collection' the people in the ghetto sure don't look like they weigh 77lbs on average...

Various images from different collections;

Krakow


Plonsk




Warsaw


Vilna


77lbs...

The stroop photos are not the 42 deportation ones. If you knew your history, you would know that only employable Jews remained in the ghetto during the time of the uprising. If you want these workers to be productive you feed them. Yawn

[Stubble]

I've been through '42, yawn...

They aren't 77lbs, scratch...

Maybe you can find a picture of your 'sub compact' liquid self combusting jews, spit...

[Nessie]

I've been through '42, yawn...

They aren't 77lbs, scratch...

Maybe you can find a picture of your 'sub compact' liquid self combusting jews, spit...

You cannot work out how so many people (exact number unknown) fitted into mass graves (exact volumes unknown), therefore you conclude that since you must be able to work it out and you cannot, it cannot have happened and there are no mass graves. Genius.

The correct conclusion must be that all the camp eyewitnesses speaking to mass graves are liars and archaeological and geophysical surveys evidencing mass graves are fake, as part of a conspiracy to fool the world, but not you.

It does not matter that you cannot find any evidence, from any source, as to what really happened inside the AR camps, that the ground does not contain mass graves and evidence of mass transports of people back out of the camps.

Your way of not evidencing your beliefs, your reliance on an unevidenced conspiracy, your confidence in your calculations based on very uncertain data and ability to ignore what is evidenced, is remarkable.

[Keen]

Moreover, to come back to the issue of the proper baseline...

The proper baseline here is the title of this thread: "Where'd They Go?"

You, and the other low IQ lying cowards like you, allege that 2.075 million jews went to 4 different locations (Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II) and ended up in 89 specifically identified spots within those 4 locations.

That is your unsubstantiated allegation.

Asking those who are skeptical of your unsubstantiated allegation to tell you "where did they go then?" rather than substantiate your unsubstantiated allegation is a tacit admission that you do not know where they went and that you are lying when you alleged that you know where they went.

There's this little thing called "the burden of proof" - have you ever heard of that?

It has been proven that you and the low IQ lying cowards like you are lying when you say that you know where they went: http://thisisaboutscience.com/

If you and the low IQ lying cowards like you are really telling the truth about where they went, then each of the 89 specifically identified spots would contain, on average, 23,315 of them.

To prove what a lying, cowardly POS that you are nick, all we have to do is ask you a few simple questions. Like this one for example:

nick, here is one of the 89 specific spots that you say some of those 2.075 million of them went:



How many of them are we looking at in this photo nick?

[Keen]

You can answer the question maybe that...

How about you answering a question bombsaway:

How many jews can you prove actually ended up in the 89 specific spots where you allege they ended up?

[Keen]

We aren’t debating levels of ‘badness’ here.

Well, actually nothing is being "debated" here.

What should be being debated in this thread is this:

From now on, whenever I am asked, where'd they go, the response I will be giving is, exactly, where'd they go?

The answer to the question "where exactly did they go?" is answered by the low IQ reality deniers that they went to 89 specific spots within 4 specific locations. But when asked to prove this unsubstantiated allegation, the lying, low IQ cowards try to shift the burden of proof and cravenly refuse to prove that what they say has been proven has actually been proven.

A good example is Sobibor. The low IQ reality deniers allege that 250,000 jews ended up in Sobibor, but they can only show credible evidence that 11 did. ( viewtopic.php?p=15969#p15969 )

The cowardly low IQ reality deniers just love to ask the question "Well where did they go then?" but when they are asked "Well, where did the 249,989 jews go then?" - they cravenly run away like the lying cowards that they are.

[Keen]

There is nothing about Jews arriving and being resettled, as in being accommodated in camps or ghettos.

Strawman.

Who says the Germans "accommodated" jews in camps or ghettos in the east?