The Charlie Kirk assassination and the impulse to declare things as forgeries

Do you have a hot take on the Peloponnesian War? Do share.
User avatar
Scott
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 4:05 am

Re: The Charlie Kirk assassination and the impulse to declare things as forgeries

Post by Scott »

I'm all for a complete file dump after we get a conviction for this guy and a Death Sentence imposed, but there really isn't anything else that we need to know until the trial.

The amount of information released was adequate to identify our suspect in the Charlie Kirk shooting. His parents recognized him and knew about Grandpa's gun, so they convinced their son, Tyler Robinson to turn himself in.

The only thing anomalous is the bullet trajectory of the .30-06 fired at Kirk, which we would need to see the autopsy report for. And I would like to know more about the exact ammunition used and the gun itself.

The cherrypicked chats and texts between Tyler Robinson and his boyfriend, Lance Twiggs can be authenticated with the electronic metadata in the actual trial, and the boyfriend and all of the parents will likely testify under oath.

The bottom line is that the case against Tyler Robinson is damning.

As far as the 1960s assassinations, Doctah King was also hit by a .30-06 fired at relatively close range and the bullet did not exit the numinous Negro's body. This is not surprising since we do know the bullet trajectory in his cadaver (i.e., it went through his jaw, neck, and lodged in his opposite shoulder).

And there were numerous assassination committees held by Congress in the 1970s regarding JFK that nobody now remembers. Senator Frank Church (D-ID) was especially suspicious of the CIA. But although tangents were explored that the Warren Commission thought irrelevant, nothing new was developed.

Oswald acted alone.

The whole story is well told by the massive Vincent Bugliosi tome and by Dale Myers on the Tippit shooting, as I have already explained. Or for the person interested in a much easier read from a Jew, the Gerald Posner book lays it out. As Ricky Ricardo might say, "Wucy, you gots some readin' ta do."

And as far as the vaccines go, you do you.

If the borders were sealed off better, the school kiddies might not need Hepatitis B vaccinations. The state of Idaho eliminated the school vaccine mandates, but 15 percent of their population is Hispanic so we will see what happens.

Smallpox has been eradicated and the younger generations don't have the nasty vaccination scars on the inside of their arms like us Baby Boomers and Generation X'ers do. Polio has come close to eradication ─ unless it doesn't ─ thanks to the Luddites.

It is alarming that there are new cases of Measles in this day and age, since it is easily prevented. People have forgotten how harmful such diseases could be ─ with deaths, blindness, and deafness possible.

The vaccine was not available when I was an infant, and I was nearly killed. Fortunately my Grandmother was a registered nurse and told my parents over the telephone exactly what to do, and then they got me into a small country hospital where the staff gave me an ice bath to lower my fever as I had been convulsing. No brain damage done as far as I know.

:-)
Last edited by Scott on Mon Nov 03, 2025 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A young General Napoleon Bonaparte gives the mob a "Whiff of Grapeshot" on the streets of Paris, and that "thing we specifically call French Revolution is blown into space by it."
~ Thomas Carlyle
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 1153
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: The Charlie Kirk assassination and the impulse to declare things as forgeries

Post by HansHill »

Scott wrote: Mon Nov 03, 2025 1:42 pm Oswald acted alone.
Hello Scott, I would be interested in your thoughts on the "multiple Oswalds" theory - I have not finished the book yet but the theory proposed by Cory Hughes feels compelling. If you are not aware of the theory, he has multiple podcasts etc going over it, if you don't have time for the book.
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: The Charlie Kirk assassination and the impulse to declare things as forgeries

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

Scott wrote: Mon Nov 03, 2025 1:42 pm I'm all for a complete file dump after we get a conviction for this guy and a Death Sentence imposed, but there really isn't anything else that we need to know until the trial.
:lol: :lol:
TRANSLATION: “Move along folks. We’ve got the killer. Don’t listen to anyone but us.
Remember, we’d never, ever lie to you. Trust us!
Just believe and obey. Ok?
So… Move along.”


Scott wrote: Mon Nov 03, 2025 1:42 pm The amount of information released was adequate to identify our suspect in the Charlie Kirk shooting.
:lol: :lol:
TRANSLATION: “we have told you what to believe, so just DO THAT! Believe us. Don’t think, reason, or consider! Just believe!
It is now unpatriotic and possibly interference in the legal process to question or investigate. You have been warned”


Scott wrote: Mon Nov 03, 2025 1:42 pmHis parents recognized him and knew about Grandpa's gun, so they convinced Tyler Robionson to turn himself in.
Wrong! As usual Scott is deceiving and avoiding the evidence already shared in this topic-thread that refutes this ‘official’ narrative.

Scott wrote: Mon Nov 03, 2025 1:42 pm The only thing anomalous is the bullet trajectory of the .30-06 fired at Kirk, which we would need to see the autopsy report for. And I would like to know more about the exact ammunition used and the gun itself.

The cherrypicked chats and texts between Tyler Robinson and his boyfriend, Lance Twiggs can be authenticated with the electronic metadata in the actual trial, and the boyfriend and all of the parents will likely testify under oath.

The bottom line is that the case against Tyler Robinson is damning.
TRANSLATION: “Its’s damning, God damn you! Why are you still researching…. er… I mean ‘grifting’? Why are you doing that? We’ve told you everything that we want you to know!”

Scott wrote: Mon Nov 03, 2025 1:42 pm As far as the 1960s assassinations, [blah, blah, blah]… as I have already explained.

[snip] …And as far as the vaccines go… [snip]

If the borders were sealed off better, the …[blah, blah, blah] …and I was nearly killed. Fortunately my… [snip]
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
User avatar
Scott
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 4:05 am

Re: The Charlie Kirk assassination and the impulse to declare things as forgeries

Post by Scott »

More investigation is fine, Wahrheitssucher ─ if you have some evidence. But speculation is not evidence.

Some investigators like Gray Hughes have gone to the crime scence at Utah Valley University and walked the neighborhood while filming for YouTube. Hughes also got ring doorbell camera files from some of the actual homeowners that gave copies to the police. Robinson started casing the neighborhood as early as 8:30 in the morning wearing different outfits.

HansHill, I would rather read the Cory Hughes book, if there is a legitimate thesis to be explored, rather than listen to edgy podcasts. I think the Judge Jim Garrison thesis that Oswald was some kind of a deep cover U.S. intelligence asset is complete nonsense.

Former L.A. Prosecutor and author Vincent Bugliosi spends quite a lot of time on Oswald's life.

Oswald wasn't that complicated, and he was not much more than a coffee gofer in the Marine Corps either but he was a decent marksman. Oswald did reasonably well in the Marine Corps until he got bored, like everything else that he did in life. Oswald had a severe learning disability (dyslexia) and struggled to fill out a job application or to write a simple business letter ─ but of course, in his mind, he was a persecuted genius.

Oswald was a self-styled revolutionary who defected briefly to the Soviet Union, but they were not impressed. The Soviets gave Oswald a basic job at a Minsk radio factory at an inflated rate of pay, but he was actually a mediocre worker. Dissatisfied, Oswald was able to come back to the United States with a new wife along and without any issues because he was not a spy ─ not that he would have ever had access to actual classified information while in the Marine Corps. Like the fictional Gomer Pyle, Lee Harvey Oswald never advanced in the USMC past Private First Class (E-2).

The CIA was not interested in him at all, but that might have changed if he had actually been successful in cultivating some relationsips with Cuban activist groups. The FBI was not interested in him either, except that they wanted his current address on file since he was a former defector.

Oswald's wife, Marina Oswald knew that her husband had taken a pot shot with his new Italian surplus Carcano rifle at General Ted Walker earlier in the year ─ a John Birch Society politician hated by the Left far more than John Kennedy ─ but she feared deportation and did not report anything to the police. Oswald could not support her and their two kids and already wanted to send her back to Russia.

Marina Oswald is the one who actually took the "resume" photos (several different poses) in the back yard of their apartment on Neely Street in Dallas in the Oak Cliff neighborhood near the Texas Theater (where he would be captured) and his future boarding house, and the location where officer Tippit was shot. This is only a couple of miles from downtown Dallas, and today there are plans to turn the Neely house into a museum like the Boarding House already is. Oswald denied that his "resume" photograph(s) with the rifle, revolver and Communist flyers were genuine, but Marina testified that it was in fact she who took them, and she also had plenty of copies and different poses.

:-)
A young General Napoleon Bonaparte gives the mob a "Whiff of Grapeshot" on the streets of Paris, and that "thing we specifically call French Revolution is blown into space by it."
~ Thomas Carlyle
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: The Charlie Kirk assassination and the impulse to declare things as forgeries

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

.
Watch it before its banned…



Despite the mistake on ‘rifle reassembly’ this is good satire! Watch and learn,
(erm… except you Scott. Your job is to contact Jootube and make a complaint about anti-septicism)



The two above are a month old. Here’s their latest:
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
User avatar
Scott
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 4:05 am

Re: The Charlie Kirk assassination and the impulse to declare things as forgeries

Post by Scott »

So you are using AI to make your arguments and evidence. JFC.

Too bad CODOH doesn't have a puking emoticon.

:roll:
A young General Napoleon Bonaparte gives the mob a "Whiff of Grapeshot" on the streets of Paris, and that "thing we specifically call French Revolution is blown into space by it."
~ Thomas Carlyle
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: The Charlie Kirk assassination and the impulse to declare things as forgeries

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

Scott wrote: Tue Nov 04, 2025 7:51 am So you are using AI to make your arguments and evidence.
Er, no, Scott.
Anyway… I told YOU not to watch. ;)

But since you have, I’d better spell it out for you, so you understand / can not misrepresent further.

A.) those videos — with argument by satire — that I just posted were “made” (that is = created/invented) by HUMANS (not Ai).

B.) the humans “made” (invented/created) a script and a storyboard that showed how ridiculously unbelievable much of the ‘official’ story is of Kirk’s killing. They invented satire which concentrates on highlighting the improbable parts plus the highly probable zionist involvement and their motivations. (Something which I appreciate you — and all zionist, their stooges and Wetzelrad — won’t be happy with.)

C.) These humans (not Ai) then got actors to act out their storyboard and say the lines these humans (not Ai) had “made” (created/written).
D.) They then used Ai to tweak their film.
Understand?

Regardless. It IS an amusing, fairly accurate and brilliantly executed satire. It shows how much the official story stinks and how no unbiased or intelligent person would believe it, let alone promote and defend it.

I didn’t expect you to enjoy or appreciate it, as it blows your bullsh*t misrepresentation of the actual details and the probable motivations out of the water. But I did expect you to discontinue — at least temporarily — your misrepresentation of the actual facts, not double-down with further misinformation. ;)
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
Post Reply