The (10) facts that prove the Holocaust is a hoax

[Joe Splink]

#1 - the Soviets built a hoax gas chamber at Auschwitz
#2 - the Nazis kept meticulous records at Auschwitz, including death certificates showing ethnicity and cause of death for each prisoner that died, the Soviets captured the records and hid them for 50 years. The allies captured the records for the camps in Germany and released them relatively recently. The records prove there was no Holocaust.
#3 - the photos/footage of Holocaust victims was taken after the war had ended at camps in Germany and showed prisoners that had died of disease in the last months of the war (the true provenance of the photos is available).
#4 - It was announced in the New York Times in 1906 that 6,000,000 Jews were being murderously and systematically exterminated (in Russia).
#5 - the testimony of prominent Holocaust survivors is prima facie absurd. E. Wiesel testified that the Nazis threw infants into the air and used them as targets for machine guns. Also that the Nazis killed the Jews by tossing them alive into burning pits, one for children one for adults. Abraham Bomba testified that he have haircuts to naked women and children, including neighbors and relatives, inside the gas chamber just before they were to be gassed. F. Meuller, the only man to see the Jews die and live to tell about it according to Yehuda Bauer, Director of Research at Yad Vashem, testified that every Sunday the Nazis assembled the prisoners and ordered them to doff their caps, and those too slow were beaten to death. Primo Levi testified that 24,000 Jews were killed in one day at Auschwitz.
#6 - The Nazis aggressively investigated crime in the camps. Otto Koch, commandant at Buchenwald, was tried and executed for his involvement in the deaths of three prisoners. The chief investigator/prosecutor was Konrad Morgen, known as the bloodhound judge.
#8 - The US sent a team of forensic pathologists led by Dr. Charles Larson who conducted 100s of autopsies in the camps, no gassing victims were discovered.
#9 - There are no mass graves of Holocaust victims. Paul Blobel was tried for exhuming and burning the victims, he testified that the Nazis opened the mass graves, poured gasoline on the bodies, burned them, and covered them back up.
#10 - The real 'gas chambers' at Auschwitz were fumigation rooms used to delouse clothing. The building containing these rooms and special equipment for vaporizing Zyklon is still standing at Auschwitz, but not shown to visitors.
#11 - There is a photo of Anne Frank taken by the British as they entered Belsen, showing she was alive at the end of the war.
#12 - Prominent Holocaust 'scholar' R. Van Pelt admits there is no physical evidence for the Holocaust, and claims that that is true of other historical events.
#13 - Simon Wiesenthal admitted that the 5,000,000 number of non-Jewish victims of Holocaust was made up out of thin air.
#14 - Following Nuremberg a stone plaque was placed at the gate to the camp stating that 4,000,000 had died there. It was later, 1990, changed to 1.5 million, and recently the total number of persons sent to the camp estimated to be 1.3 million. The 'official' number of victims at Majdanek was given as 1.5 million at Nuremberg and it now 70,000.
#15 - There are no 'gas chambers' other than the hoax gas chamber at Auschwitz.

[HeiligeSturmV2]

#11 - There is a photo of Anne Frank taken by the British as they entered Belsen, showing she was alive at the end of the war.

This picture should be shared here.

[Joe Splink]

The photo on the top is a published photo of Anne Frank, the bottom photo is clipped from a screenshot from Memory of The Camps, you can see on PBS Frontline. I asked Grok to compare the two pics, and you can see the response.


If there is any doubt I overlaid the 2 pics using photoshop, setting the opacity of the top photo to 0, and slowly increased the top photo opacity to 1, in this vid

I also asked via email the Anne Frank center in Amsterdam to comment on the girl in the screenshot, they said they had no knowledge of it.

[HansHill]

Anne Frank dying or surviving the war has no material impact on the Holocaust narrative, since it is not claimed* she was ever gassed or otherwise targeted for extermination. At best, it speaks to the unscrupulous and amoral nature of certain storytellers but not the overarching narrative.

*this may be claimed by low information normies but imho there are better channels to educate them on Holocaust matters.

[Stubble]

Herr Hill, if the girl lived through 'the holocaust' only to die under the stewardship of the allies, the irony runs deep.

Understanding how her story became part of official cannon is hard for me. She wasn't exterminated at Auschwitz and she died of typhus at Bergen Belsan. I mean, this, it doesn't fit with the story man. We are told that women and children were murdered on arrival at Auschwitz Birkenau. Then we get 'Diary of a Young Girl' as required reading, right next to 'Night'...

These stories are incongruent with what we are told was the reality experienced by the jews.

I used to attack the diary. Over time I have come around to Germar's point of view on it. It isn't useful to attack the diary even if parts of it are indeed fake. Better to show how incongruent it is with the narrative.

[Wetzelrad]

These are not the best-formulated arguments but they are pretty salient ones.

#1 - the Soviets built a hoax gas chamber at Auschwitz

It's not as if it was built from scratch. The Soviets made major modifications to an existing building which had already been modified many times in its history.

#2 - the Nazis kept meticulous records at Auschwitz, including death certificates showing ethnicity and cause of death for each prisoner that died, the Soviets captured the records and hid them for 50 years. The allies captured the records for the camps in Germany and released them relatively recently. The records prove there was no Holocaust.

As written, I would say these events cast doubt on the Soviet version of events, but they can't strictly disprove it.

#9 - There are no mass graves of Holocaust victims. Paul Blobel was tried for exhuming and burning the victims, he testified that the Nazis opened the mass graves, poured gasoline on the bodies, burned them, and covered them back up.

A true believer might say this item actually proves the Holocaust was real. However the lack of really clear and voluminous human remains is a big problem with the story. It can't be explained away retroactively that the graves all vanished, because even the ash remains should be substantial.

What can be said without reservation is that in the places where vast amounts of human remains are said to have been buried or disposed of, the remains are simply not there.

#11 - There is a photo of Anne Frank taken by the British as they entered Belsen, showing she was alive at the end of the war.

I remain skeptical of this, but I don't consider it material either. Historians simply do not know when Anne Frank died. What they agree on is that Anne Frank died of typhus, just like tens of thousands of others in camp Belsen, both before and after "liberation".

The takeaway from Anne Frank should be the simple fact that even the Allies couldn't save these prisoners when they took custody over them.

#15 - There are no 'gas chambers' other than the hoax gas chamber at Auschwitz.

If referring to Auschwitz alone this may be true, but then it would make sense to merge this with item 10.

[Wetzelrad]

Anne Frank dying or surviving the war has no material impact on the Holocaust narrative, since it is not claimed* she was ever gassed or otherwise targeted for extermination. At best, it speaks to the unscrupulous and amoral nature of certain storytellers but not the overarching narrative.

*this may be claimed by low information normies but imho there are better channels to educate them on Holocaust matters.

"Low information normies"? Ironically the USHMM itself recently claimed, in absence of any evidence, that Anne Frank was "murdered". See this grandstanding tweet:

[Wetzelrad]

And if anyone is simply looking for punchy arguments against the Holocaust, i.e. a top 10 list, here is one from Karl Radl. This is the substance of it:

1) The Wannsee Conference never refers to 'extermination'... not once.

2) The Enigma Intercepts don't mention or support a 'Holocaust' narrative.

3) We know of jews who were transited through 'pure death camps'.

4) The 6 million dead/dying jews figure predates the 'Holocaust' by at least 60 years.

5) The 6 million dead figure truly arrives in a 'Holocaust' context by 1944 well before it could have ever been factually established.

6) The killing methods by camp are contradictory with different key 'Holocaust witnesses' contracting each other and also claiming physical impossibilities (like fat people burn faster) occurred.

7) The death tolls for the 'death camps' (pure and mixed) have been consistently and significantly shifted downward over time but the 6 million never changes. It has only changed to 'approximately 6 million' or 'circa 6 million'.

8) There is no Hitler order and it is now widely believed there was never actually one.

9) There is a severe lack of any normal documentation that we'd expect such a program to generat[e]. We have tonnes of German documentation and records but not once in eighty years has anyone found any substantive documentation or indication of such a program.

10) Hundreds of tonnes human ash and bone fragments must have been generated. These have never been found and little effort has been made to locate such an obvious bit of evidence for the 'Holocaust' thesis not even field walking which is normal archaeological practice.

[Joe Splink]

As written, I would say these events (the Auschwitz records) cast doubt on the Soviet version of events, but they can't strictly disprove it.

Generally speaking, it can be difficult to prove that something that didn't happen didn't happen. For example, I can't prove that little green men didn't land somewhere in Utah in the 1940's as there were no surveillance cameras covering the state at that time. Even though there were many eyewitness reports that they did, but common sense prevents us from taking them seriously enough to waste time investigating.

But, we can document something that did happen, e.g. the holohoax. So, the fact that the Soviets hid the Nazi records and claimed that the Nazis had killed 4 million at Auschwitz does document a hoax. The fact that Elie Wiesel, not a drunk in a bar, but the first director of the USHMM and the author of a preposterous book that is required reading in schools across the US, states that 'The Nazis tossed babies into the air and used them as targets for machine guns documents the hoax. That he wrote that the Nazis killed the Jews by tossing them alive into burning pits, one for children, one for adults, does document the hoax.

So, that's what the OP actually does, it documents the lies, the hoax. Now of course you might note that proving 1000 conscious lies still doesn't prove that the Holocaust didn't happen, and you would be correct. But that's too high a standard to meet, all that can be done is to observe that there is no evidence that it did happen, and to document the hoax, and it is truly a massive hoax with tons of evidence.

[Hektor]

Herr Hill, if the girl lived through 'the holocaust' only to die under the stewardship of the allies, the irony runs deep.

Understanding how her story became part of official cannon is hard for me. She wasn't exterminated at Auschwitz and she died of typhus at Bergen Belsan. I mean, this, it doesn't fit with the story man. We are told that women and children were murdered on arrival at Auschwitz Birkenau. Then we get 'Diary of a Young Girl' as required reading, right next to 'Night'...

These stories are incongruent with what we are told was the reality experienced by the jews.

I used to attack the diary. Over time I have come around to Germar's point of view on it. It isn't useful to attack the diary even if parts of it are indeed fake. Better to show how incongruent it is with the narrative.

Even the official Anne-Frank-Story is incongruent with the narrative.

But what sinks the boat is the absence of the evidences expected if the narrative was true. It simply isn't there and exterminationist assertions and extrapolations don't change this.

[borjastick]

Here's another fun question or two which proves the holocaust could not have happened.

Why is it that in the camps which are supposed to have been death camps no mass graves or bodies or evidence of mass murder exists yet in the mainly German based camps such as Belsen the bodies were left in their thousands for all to see. How is it possible that in a 'death camp' all evidence was magically disappeared and yet in a normal camp it wasn't? If it was possible to cremate all these millions of bodies in Auschwitz, Majdanek, Sobibor, Treblinka in a very short period of time in ovens that could not have handled such volumes, and then dispose of the thousands of tons of cremains such that they were never seen again, why not in the other camps on Western soil was this planning and facility nowhere to be seen or implemeted.

[TlsMS93]

Here's another fun question or two which proves the holocaust could not have happened.

Why is it that in the camps which are supposed to have been death camps no mass graves or bodies or evidence of mass murder exists yet in the mainly German based camps such as Belsen the bodies were left in their thousands for all to see. How is it possible that in a 'death camp' all evidence was magically disappeared and yet in a normal camp it wasn't? If it was possible to cremate all these millions of bodies in Auschwitz, Majdanek, Sobibor, Treblinka in a very short period of time in ovens that could not have handled such volumes, and then dispose of the thousands of tons of cremains such that they were never seen again, why not in the other camps on Western soil was this planning and facility nowhere to be seen or implemeted.

You're setting the exterminationists up for a shot with that question.

[PotPie]

There are more holes in the gassing narrative than a block of Swiss cheese, but to touch on a couple of them, yes the Soviets built a chimney that connects to nothing. Why would they do that if gassings really happened? As far as NSDAP records go, the records of arrivals and departures from Auschwitz-Birkenau are missing and in their place, we have things such as Communist Jewish-authored Auschwitz Kalendarium by Marxist camp resistance member Danuta Czech and her collaborators which has been a gold standard source for "holocaust history" books.

[PotPie]

10) Hundreds of tonnes human ash and bone fragments must have been generated. These have never been found and little effort has been made to locate such an obvious bit of evidence for the 'Holocaust' thesis not even field walking which is normal archaeological practice.

This is yet another. The claim is that 1 million were murdered at Auschwitz-Birkenau and the ashes dumped into the Vistula River, yet that river was never reported choked with all that ash, nor has anyone presented anything resembling any amount of human bone fragments from the cremation process anywhere along that river. There should be fragments and other remains everywhere. There aren't, and even the help of AI can't locate anything. In spite of years of dredging, drought, and other activities along this waterway, nobody has found physical evidence of human ash dumping into the Vistula, period. Each body, according to AI, yields 4-7 lbs or 2-3 kg of ash. Multiply that by 1 million. Massive amounts missing from the riverbed and sea floor that should be there. These are such large amounts, that frankly, dumping in a short period of time could even outright form an artificial dam in a river, backing it up for miles, spreading the evidence everywhere. Yet it didn't happen and aerial photography likewise doesn't show that, either.

It just didn't happen.