The CODOH Revisionist Forum

ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:16 pm I'm not afraid to debate Gerdes.

It would not be a debate. It would be him getting you to answer his questions and him refusing to answer any of your questions. Do anything he does not like and expect to be abused. He is a controlling bully.

A conspiratorial belief that it is possible to fake the Holocaust, mixed with a desire for it to have not happened, is why some think the Holocaust is fake. When I say some think the Holocaust is fake, I am using that as shorthand to cover a wide range of beliefs, from very little about the ...

You have, no direct physical evidence. Nothing tangible. B-b-but maybe the walls were blue we just can't see them! Also the walls totally weren't blue and here's my coping mechanism as to why. These people, man. In reality, we do not know which or if any Leichenkeller walls turned blue and why that ...

You are big mad, aren't you. Let's look at Auschwitz Birkenau for a moment, over 1,000,000 people are said to have been murdered there. There is no murder weapon.... Yes there is, the proven gas chambers. Evidence from documents, eyewitnesses, forensics and circumstances here; https ...

This thread is about evidence and implementation, not what the Holocaust is. A previous attempt to get back on topic has been removed to a derail thread! https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=11085#p11085 So, back on topic, from the OP; There is a ton of different pieces of evidence, in my opinion ...

Holocaust Believers have claimed that the reason there are Iron Blue cyanide stains in delousing chambers but not in the gas chamber morgues is because: Dynamite destroyed them. (JC Pressac) The exposure time "per day" was 1/100th as long. (Pressac, with less extreme claims by others) They ...

... Apples and pears mate, apples and pears. Double standards. Can't be bothered to spell it out but Nessie has, once again deliberately or otherwise, missed the point. It is not double standards so I would request that Nessie reads what was said in the above posts and thinks clearly about the ...

Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 4:43 pm

Nessie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 4:10 pm ...

You just made that position up, straw man fallacy. I am not surprised you chose to die on a logical fallacy.

Is this like your swimming pools claim Nessie?

Or is it more like the wannsee minutes?

Where you nit pick and try and score debate points, because you have no evidence?

I am not against you presenting evidence. In fact, I am insisting that you present evidence instead of claiming to have all this evidence and never delivering. If you had a good case, you would present the argumentation and support for your position and, if it were convincing, this would naturally ...

Archie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 1:56 pm "The Holocaust is true because reasons"

Straw man fallacy, which you rely on, because you cannot dispute the Holocaust is true, because of the evidence which proves it happened.

Schrodinger's evidence? Nessie, if the evidence is so explicit and damning, where is it? You get show it constantly, then you shrug it off and pretend there is a lack of evidence. You've got holes in the orthodox narrative large enough for the USS Liberty to use as a port of call that you fill in ...

.... How Consistent or Inconsistent Are Revisionists? Contrary to Nessie, revisionists are in reasonably good agreement. The main example he harps on is over potential secondary uses for the Birkenau Kremas where there is the Butz/Crowell air raid shelter hypothesis vs Mattogno's disinfestation ...

Nessie frequently says the holohoaxer side is in complete agreement and is therefore correct while revisionists supposedly cannot agree among themselves and are therefore wrong. My point is not as simple as you make it out to be. As is normal, you miss out the role of evidence. You do that, because ...

Funny, the Germans destroyed documents that do not fill the Holocaust gap, in an operation that is neither documented nor evidenced, Mass killings are documented and evidenced. ... but we can claim that documents that could inform the whereabouts of these deported individuals were destroyed or ...

You ignore 100% of the eyewitness evidence, and a lot of the circumstantial evidence around the operation of the Kremas, and then come up with wildly different, unevidenced "interpretations". Yawn. We now have multiple thread debunking your "100% of the eyewitnesses" nonsense. When you are ...