Gas Chamber Video on YouTube

[Sub Wuufer]

A great introduction to revisionism, this video is miraculously still on YouTube (also on Rumble and Bit Chute).

title: "People Who Question Gas Chambers in WW2"
channel: FreeSpeechVideos

link:

Feel free to download and post this video wherever you want.

[Booze]

Excellent

[Fred Ziffel]

Pretty good video for sure

[borjastick]

Good video. I saw this some years ago but a little refresh this morning was time well spent. Difficult to argue with anything said.

This is of course why the believers such as Mrs Fish Fryer are now changing strategy; they know the gig is up on the gas chamber argument so they claim all manner of other crap to get to the same answer. All smoke and mirrors and either they are monumentally thick or most likely think we and the general public are and will believe any lies fed to us. Wrong!

[Sub Wuufer]

Excellent

Thank you for watching! I'm hoping this video will be posted on other platforms as well.

[Sub Wuufer]

Pretty good video for sure

Thank you!

[Sub Wuufer]

Good video. I saw this some years ago but a little refresh this morning was time well spent. Difficult to argue with anything said.

This is of course why the believers such as Mrs Fish Fryer are now changing strategy; they know the gig is up on the gas chamber argument so they claim all manner of other crap to get to the same answer. All smoke and mirrors and either they are monumentally thick or most likely think we and the general public are and will believe any lies fed to us. Wrong!

Yes, the gig is up. At one time, the majority believed the world is flat. We might be in the minority now, but truth is on our side.
Hopefully, if we share videos like these, maybe the consensus will turn in our favor. I'm hoping the truth becomes mainstream within 5 or 10 years.

[Cowboy]

Great video. Hopefully it doesn't get taken down anytime soon. The Pastor Steven Anderson monologue that's included was one of the first videos I watched on the subject of revisionism after I became curious.

Hopefully, if we share videos like these, maybe the consensus will turn in our favor. I'm hoping the truth becomes mainstream within 5 or 10 years.

As long as we continue to plant seeds of doubt, I think this is somewhat possible. The lifting of mass censorship on X and the emergence of platforms such as Rumble and Bitchute have made it ever so easier to find revisionist content. I've never heard a case of someone who became a revisionist and then went back to believing the orthodoxy.

[Wahrheitssucher]

…I've never heard a case of someone who became a revisionist and then went back to believing the orthodoxy.

Jean-Claude Pressac.

I am not a Jew and I was at one time a “revisionist”. After reading this book, some will no doubt think that I still am one. This is quite possible and I bear them no grudge. The distinction between these two fiercely opposed schools, the “exterminationists” and the “revisionists”, becomes meaningless once a certain threshold of knowledge about the former Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp has been reached. I have passed this point of no return.

Any normal human being, visiting the Auschwitz camp for the first time, feels a deep emotional shock. The weight of history allows of no other response. An ordinary but motivated tourist, I nearly did away with myself one evening in October 1979 in the main camp, the Stammlager, overwhelmed by the evidence and by despair. I have often wondered how I would have been able to perform this act of self-destruction. Since that lugubrious evening, I have spent a total of almost three months, spread over ten visits between 1979 and 1984, studying the German archives in the Auschwitz State Museum, examining the ruins of Birkenau, trying to understand and put into place the pieces of this gigantic and incredible puzzle...

https://web.archive.org/web/20110927042 ... 0537.shtml

[borjastick]

Good video. I saw this some years ago but a little refresh this morning was time well spent. Difficult to argue with anything said.

This is of course why the believers such as Mrs Fish Fryer are now changing strategy; they know the gig is up on the gas chamber argument so they claim all manner of other crap to get to the same answer. All smoke and mirrors and either they are monumentally thick or most likely think we and the general public are and will believe any lies fed to us. Wrong!

Yes, the gig is up. At one time, the majority believed the world is flat. We might be in the minority now, but truth is on our side.
Hopefully, if we share videos like these, maybe the consensus will turn in our favor. I'm hoping the truth becomes mainstream within 5 or 10 years.

I agree with you. We have made significant progress in distributing the truth. The actions of israel genociding the Gazans helps the revisionist cause too because people who were otherwise disengaged in the holocaust debate sign up to the general hatred of israel and then delve into why the jews are disliked and their more recent history, such as the holocaust.

However I just watched this video, which is building a large viewing number, and am astonished at the stupid and ignorant comments below it agreeing with the claim that millions of jews were gassed at Auschwitz;

[Cowboy]

I've never heard a case of someone who became a revisionist and then went back to believing the orthodoxy.

Jean-Claude Pressac.

Oh yeah, I am familiar with that name. Thank you for clarifying.

[Sub Wuufer]

Good video. I saw this some years ago but a little refresh this morning was time well spent. Difficult to argue with anything said.

This is of course why the believers such as Mrs Fish Fryer are now changing strategy; they know the gig is up on the gas chamber argument so they claim all manner of other crap to get to the same answer. All smoke and mirrors and either they are monumentally thick or most likely think we and the general public are and will believe any lies fed to us. Wrong!

Yes, the gig is up. At one time, the majority believed the world is flat. We might be in the minority now, but truth is on our side.
Hopefully, if we share videos like these, maybe the consensus will turn in our favor. I'm hoping the truth becomes mainstream within 5 or 10 years.

I agree with you. We have made significant progress in distributing the truth. The actions of israel genociding the Gazans helps the revisionist cause too because people who were otherwise disengaged in the holocaust debate sign up to the general hatred of israel and then delve into why the jews are disliked and their more recent history, such as the holocaust.

However I just watched this video, which is building a large viewing number, and am astonished at the stupid and ignorant comments below it agreeing with the claim that millions of jews were gassed at Auschwitz;

Yeah YouTube is littered with ignorant sheep. That's why we need to keep sharing revisionist videos and links as much as we can. We will win, I hope, within the next 5 or 10 years.

[Booze]

However I just watched this video, which is building a large viewing number, and am astonished at the stupid and ignorant comments below it agreeing with the claim that millions of jews were gassed at Auschwitz;

Look at how quick a high cultured nation like Germany flipped!
If it could happen in Germany it could happen anywhere.

What could we do to ensure it never happens again?
How about hate speech laws?
Prison time for unapproved speech.

[Eye of Zyclone]

…I've never heard a case of someone who became a revisionist and then went back to believing the orthodoxy.

Jean-Claude Pressac.

I am not a Jew and I was at one time a “revisionist”. After reading this book, some will no doubt think that I still am one. This is quite possible and I bear them no grudge. The distinction between these two fiercely opposed schools, the “exterminationists” and the “revisionists”, becomes meaningless once a certain threshold of knowledge about the former Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp has been reached. I have passed this point of no return.

Any normal human being, visiting the Auschwitz camp for the first time, feels a deep emotional shock. The weight of history allows of no other response. An ordinary but motivated tourist, I nearly did away with myself one evening in October 1979 in the main camp, the Stammlager, overwhelmed by the evidence and by despair. I have often wondered how I would have been able to perform this act of self-destruction. Since that lugubrious evening, I have spent a total of almost three months, spread over ten visits between 1979 and 1984, studying the German archives in the Auschwitz State Museum, examining the ruins of Birkenau, trying to understand and put into place the pieces of this gigantic and incredible puzzle...

https://web.archive.org/web/20110927042 ... 0537.shtml

According to Robert Faurisson, that was a big lie, some kind of fake credentials.

Pr. Robert Faurison interviewed by the antirevisionist historian Valérie Igounet :

I take this opportunity to destroy the myth of Pressac as a "former revisionist." What kind of invention is this? Pressac was never a revisionist. I know it sounds good to say, "You see, he was a revisionist, and then, afterward, he left. He realized that Faurisson was talking nonsense." Complete fabrication! First of all, Pressac never set foot here (at Faurisson's house) like you (Valérie Igounet) did. You came. I would never have let him into my home. But he often came to Pierre Guillaume's house. He saw me working and he was distraught. I was in poor health. I was penniless. I didn't always have enough to eat. Pressac told me, "Mr. Faurisson, you have to stop." And I replied, "Pressac, let me work in peace!" He often came to Guillaume's house and Pierre Guillaume sometimes talked with him. I once told him two or three sentences and I noticed that Pressac had a verbal tic. He always answered: "Yes-no." There are people who say: "Yes and no." He was more like: "Are you all right, Pressac?" - "Yes-no." He is temperamental. He had serious health problems at birth and it left him with after-effects. So, one day, he came to Guillaume's house and told me: "Mr. Faurisson, I would like to speak to you." I told him: "Listen, Pressac. Can't you see that you are disturbing me once again? I am working." He said to me: "I would like to talk with you." I replied: "At a pinch, I agree to speak with you, but in front of a tape recorder because you keep pretending that you did not say what you've just said." It was in front of a tape recorder or nothing. And then, Pressac said: "Yes-no!" I kicked him out. That guy was never a revisionist. He's a poor soul who works as a shopkeeper, a pharmacist who's bored in his little Parisian suburb.

Original in French :

Entretien de Robert Faurisson avec Valérie Igounet précédé d’une analyse de Histoire du négationnisme en France

[...]

J’en profite pour détruire le mythe de Pressac « ancien révi­sionniste ». Qu’est-ce que c’est, cette invention-là ? Jamais Pressac n’a été révisionniste. Je sais que cela fait bien de dire : « Vous comprenez, il était révisionniste et puis, après, il est parti. Il s’est rendu compte que Faurisson disait des sottises. » Mais jamais de la vie ! D’abord, Pressac n’a jamais mis les pieds ici comme vous. Vous, vous êtes venue. Je ne l’aurais jamais admis chez moi. Mais il venait souvent chez Pierre Guillaume. Il me voyait en train de travailler et il était affolé. J’étais en mauvaise santé. Je n’avais plus le sou. Je ne mangeais pas toujours à ma faim. Pressac me disait : « M. Faurisson, il faut arrêter. » Et moi, je lui répondais : « Pressac, laissez-moi travailler tranquillement ! » Il venait souvent chez Guillaume qui le laissait venir et, de temps en temps, discutait avec lui. Moi, il pouvait m’arriver de dire deux ou trois phrases mais j’avais noté un tic chez Pressac. Il répondait toujours : « Oui-non. » Il y a des gens qui disent : « Oui et non. » Lui, c’était : « Vous allez bien, Pressac ? – Oui-non. » C’est un caractériel. Il a eu de gros ennuis à la naissance et il lui en est resté quelque chose. Alors, un jour, il arrive chez Guillaume et me dit : « M. Faurisson, je voudrais vous parler. » Je lui dis : « Écoutez, Pressac, vous voyez bien que vous me dérangez une fois de plus. Je suis en train de travailler. » Il me dit : « Je voudrais discuter avec vous. » Je lui réponds : « À la ri­gueur, je veux bien discuter avec vous mais devant un magnéto­phone parce que vous ne cessez de prétendre que vous n’avez pas dit ce que vous venez de dire. » C’était devant un magnétophone ou rien. Et là, Pressac a dit : « Oui-non ! » Je l’ai foutu à la porte. Jamais ce type n’a été révisionniste. C’est un pauvre hère qui fait le métier de commerçant, de potard, et qui s’ennuie dans sa petite banlieue parisienne.

https://robert-faurisson.com/histoire/e ... n-igounet/

[Wahrheitssucher]

…I've never heard a case of someone who became a revisionist and then went back to believing the orthodoxy.

Jean-Claude Pressac.

I am not a Jew and I was at one time a “revisionist”. After reading this book, some will no doubt think that I still am one. This is quite possible and I bear them no grudge. The distinction between these two fiercely opposed schools, the “exterminationists” and the “revisionists”, becomes meaningless once a certain threshold of knowledge about the former Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp has been reached. I have passed this point of no return.

Any normal human being, visiting the Auschwitz camp for the first time, feels a deep emotional shock. The weight of history allows of no other response. An ordinary but motivated tourist, I nearly did away with myself one evening in October 1979 in the main camp, the Stammlager, overwhelmed by the evidence and by despair. I have often wondered how I would have been able to perform this act of self-destruction. Since that lugubrious evening, I have spent a total of almost three months, spread over ten visits between 1979 and 1984, studying the German archives in the Auschwitz State Museum, examining the ruins of Birkenau, trying to understand and put into place the pieces of this gigantic and incredible puzzle...

https://web.archive.org/web/20110927042 ... 0537.shtml

According to Robert Faurisson, that was a big lie, some kind of fake credentials.

Pr. Robert Faurison interviewed by the antirevisionist historian Valérie Igounet :

I take this opportunity to destroy the myth of Pressac as a "former revisionist." What kind of invention is this? Pressac was never a revisionist. I know it sounds good to say, "You see, he was a revisionist, and then, afterward, he left. He realized that Faurisson was talking nonsense." Complete fabrication! First of all, Pressac never set foot here (at Faurisson's house) like you (Valérie Igounet) did. You came. I would never have let him into my home. But he often came to Pierre Guillaume's house. He saw me working and he was distraught. I was in poor health. I was penniless. I didn't always have enough to eat. Pressac told me, "Mr. Faurisson, you have to stop." And I replied, "Pressac, let me work in peace!" He often came to Guillaume's house and Pierre Guillaume sometimes talked with him. I once told him two or three sentences and I noticed that Pressac had a verbal tic. He always answered: "Yes-no." There are people who say: "Yes and no." He was more like: "Are you all right, Pressac?" - "Yes-no." He is temperamental. He had serious health problems at birth and it left him with after-effects. So, one day, he came to Guillaume's house and told me: "Mr. Faurisson, I would like to speak to you." I told him: "Listen, Pressac. Can't you see that you are disturbing me once again? I am working." He said to me: "I would like to talk with you." I replied: "At a pinch, I agree to speak with you, but in front of a tape recorder because you keep pretending that you did not say what you've just said." It was in front of a tape recorder or nothing. And then, Pressac said: "Yes-no!" I kicked him out. That guy was never a revisionist. He's a poor soul who works as a shopkeeper, a pharmacist who's bored in his little Parisian suburb.

Original in French :

Entretien de Robert Faurisson avec Valérie Igounet précédé d’une analyse de Histoire du négationnisme en France

[...]

J’en profite pour détruire le mythe de Pressac « ancien révi­sionniste ». Qu’est-ce que c’est, cette invention-là ? Jamais Pressac n’a été révisionniste. Je sais que cela fait bien de dire : « Vous comprenez, il était révisionniste et puis, après, il est parti. Il s’est rendu compte que Faurisson disait des sottises. » Mais jamais de la vie ! D’abord, Pressac n’a jamais mis les pieds ici comme vous. Vous, vous êtes venue. Je ne l’aurais jamais admis chez moi. Mais il venait souvent chez Pierre Guillaume. Il me voyait en train de travailler et il était affolé. J’étais en mauvaise santé. Je n’avais plus le sou. Je ne mangeais pas toujours à ma faim. Pressac me disait : « M. Faurisson, il faut arrêter. » Et moi, je lui répondais : « Pressac, laissez-moi travailler tranquillement ! » Il venait souvent chez Guillaume qui le laissait venir et, de temps en temps, discutait avec lui. Moi, il pouvait m’arriver de dire deux ou trois phrases mais j’avais noté un tic chez Pressac. Il répondait toujours : « Oui-non. » Il y a des gens qui disent : « Oui et non. » Lui, c’était : « Vous allez bien, Pressac ? – Oui-non. » C’est un caractériel. Il a eu de gros ennuis à la naissance et il lui en est resté quelque chose. Alors, un jour, il arrive chez Guillaume et me dit : « M. Faurisson, je voudrais vous parler. » Je lui dis : « Écoutez, Pressac, vous voyez bien que vous me dérangez une fois de plus. Je suis en train de travailler. » Il me dit : « Je voudrais discuter avec vous. » Je lui réponds : « À la ri­gueur, je veux bien discuter avec vous mais devant un magnéto­phone parce que vous ne cessez de prétendre que vous n’avez pas dit ce que vous venez de dire. » C’était devant un magnétophone ou rien. Et là, Pressac a dit : « Oui-non ! » Je l’ai foutu à la porte. Jamais ce type n’a été révisionniste. C’est un pauvre hère qui fait le métier de commerçant, de potard, et qui s’ennuie dans sa petite banlieue parisienne.

https://robert-faurisson.com/histoire/e ... n-igounet/

Wow! That is a surprise.
So yet another lie.
Thanks for this EofZ.

The holocaust mythology — and the true-believer defence of it — appears to be just an unending series of deceptions upon deceptions!