A request to Confused Jew

For more adversarial interactions
Post Reply
b
bombsaway
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by bombsaway »

HansHill wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 3:54 pm
bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 3:49 pm Here's my thinking. If the Nazis had indeed been gassing people in gas chambers disguised as shower rooms, they wouldn't have wanted weird blue stains on the walls which would naturally interfere with such an illusion. If this was an obvious and expected phenomena, they probably would have taken steps to ensure it didn't happen. The delousing chambers at Dachau feature no stains whatsoever, which Rudolf ascribes to a "protective paint". If you're arguing that the Holocaust is impossible based on the lack of staining, you have to eliminate every plausible counter explanation, such as the chambers being painted similarly to the ones at Dachau.
False equivalence. The Dachau delousing chamber was purpose built using technology and dispersal mechanisms designed by the Degesch company. This would be like pointing to the absence of Prussian Blue in a United States execution chamber. It's simply not expected to form therein.
This is Rudolf

"To my knowledge, only the Zyklon B disinfestation
chambers of Dachau camp (DEGESCH circulation chambers) exhibit
no blue pigmentation, because the walls were professionally coated
with a paint impermeable to gas and water. "

He ascribes it to the impermeable paint. I'm gonna go with his expertise over your own, and I think it's plausible such paint could have been used at the A-B gas chambers, because they wanted to maintain the illusion the chambers were showers as much possible. Your 'impossibility' argument is weak, as usual.
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by HansHill »

bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:03 pm
HansHill wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 3:54 pm
bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 3:49 pm Here's my thinking. If the Nazis had indeed been gassing people in gas chambers disguised as shower rooms, they wouldn't have wanted weird blue stains on the walls which would naturally interfere with such an illusion. If this was an obvious and expected phenomena, they probably would have taken steps to ensure it didn't happen. The delousing chambers at Dachau feature no stains whatsoever, which Rudolf ascribes to a "protective paint". If you're arguing that the Holocaust is impossible based on the lack of staining, you have to eliminate every plausible counter explanation, such as the chambers being painted similarly to the ones at Dachau.
False equivalence. The Dachau delousing chamber was purpose built using technology and dispersal mechanisms designed by the Degesch company. This would be like pointing to the absence of Prussian Blue in a United States execution chamber. It's simply not expected to form therein.
This is Rudolf

"To my knowledge, only the Zyklon B disinfestation
chambers of Dachau camp (DEGESCH circulation chambers) exhibit
no blue pigmentation, because the walls were professionally coated
with a paint impermeable to gas and water. "

He ascribes it to the impermeable paint. I'm gonna go with his expertise over your own, and I think it's plausible such paint could have been used at the A-B gas chambers, because they wanted to maintain the illusion the chambers were showers as much possible. Your 'impossibility' argument is weak, as usual.
I'm agreeing with Rudolf, BA. The design and implementation of the Dachau delousing facility, including the paint and dispersal methods (both technologies), were led by Degesch.

Image

We can reliably infer that the professional treatment of these delousing facilities was to the highest standard achievable by the 3R at the time, including the ability to prevent discolouration on the inside of the chamber.

**Edit**

Why did you chop the end of the sentence?

Rudolf:

......and facilities of this type were moreover operated with heated dry air. Warm,
dry walls, however, don’t tend to absorb hydrogen cyanide and to accumulate
them as cyanide salts, as we shall see further below.

So yes, he is attributing the lack of PB to things like the dispersal methods, technologies used therein including shielding the raw masonry from interfacing directly with the HcN
b
bombsaway
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by bombsaway »

HansHill wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:09 pm

We can reliably infer that the professional treatment of these delousing facilities was to the highest standard achievable by the 3R at the time, including the ability to prevent discolouration on the inside of the chamber.

**Edit**

Why did you chop the end of the sentence?

Rudolf:

......and facilities of this type were moreover operated with heated dry air. Warm,
dry walls, however, don’t tend to absorb hydrogen cyanide and to accumulate
them as cyanide salts, as we shall see further below.

So yes, he is attributing the lack of PB to things like the dispersal methods, technologies used therein including shielding the raw masonry from interfacing directly with the HcN
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document? ... 5e79d4f5f2

Rudolf didn't include that in this version, no chopping off.

Anyway, you now have to do some analysis on paint technology to show that it wouldn't be sufficient to prevent staining. That's not clear to me.

If you're making the dry air argument, you have to show how much dry air was used at these facilities. I think the lack of paint analysis is more pressing though. Your work has just begun.
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by HansHill »

bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:17 pm
HansHill wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:09 pm

We can reliably infer that the professional treatment of these delousing facilities was to the highest standard achievable by the 3R at the time, including the ability to prevent discolouration on the inside of the chamber.

**Edit**

Why did you chop the end of the sentence?

Rudolf:

......and facilities of this type were moreover operated with heated dry air. Warm,
dry walls, however, don’t tend to absorb hydrogen cyanide and to accumulate
them as cyanide salts, as we shall see further below.

So yes, he is attributing the lack of PB to things like the dispersal methods, technologies used therein including shielding the raw masonry from interfacing directly with the HcN
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document? ... 5e79d4f5f2

Rudolf didn't include that in this version, no chopping off.

Anyway, you now have to do some analysis on paint technology to show that it wouldn't be sufficient to prevent staining. That's not clear to me.

If you're making the dry air argument, you have to show how much dry air was used at these facilities. I think the lack of paint analysis is more pressing though. Your work has just begun.
Your link was flagged by my browser as not being safe - for future reference, please use the Codoh versions: https://holocausthandbooks.com/book/the ... auschwitz/

Image

Re the warm dry air - what exactly is it you'd like me to do? Green agrees with Rudolf, and the literature more widely, that PB formation is influenced by temperature and moisture.

Re the paint - fair enough. Present me with the type of paint used in Krema II, samples would be a bonus, and I'll review what the literature has to say about it's properties and how / if they affect the formation of Prussian Blue.
b
bombsaway
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by bombsaway »

It's an open question. I haven't seen anything about paint or non paint in the krema ruins. After decades of exposure to the elements how easy would it be to even find out what paint was used?

I'm making the argument that it's plausible a special paint was used, not making any definite statements. Your argument is overall, gassings are impossible, so it's up to you show that.
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by HansHill »

bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:40 pm It's an open question.
Again fair enough - however it's also mutually exclusive to the types of arguments that Confused Jew's LLM, Markiewicz, Green etc tend to make, in that PB failed to form in the context of the masonry's direct exposure to HcN due to some parameter or another.

To introduce the "open question" that the masonry in fact never interfaced with the HcN at all, belies the weaknesses of their arguments and looks an awful lot like a retreat to tactical nihilism, and is furthermore, unfalsifiable.

**Edit** In short, if the HcN never actually interfaced directly with the masonry, then all of Confused Jew's talking points are redundant in describing the failure to form, and everything hinges on the existence of this paint (!)
C
ConfusedJew
Posts: 444
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 2:36 pm

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by ConfusedJew »

HansHill wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 2:27 pm
1 - the LLM is equating execution time with exposure time. This absolutely is not the case. For a start, the ventilation shafts in the Kremas were low to the ground. This matters for two reasons: HcN is lighter than air, and the bodies would have collapsed against the shafts preventing an immediate evavuation of the gas. This all points to a far longer exposure time than merely the execution time.
Historical testimony and SS engineering records show forced ventilation was installed exactly to clear gas fast, because SS needed to enter and remove bodies quickly for the next transport. Krema II & III had forced draft fans pulling air through vents to clear Zyklon B gas in about 20–30 minutes total after killing.

The gas chamber walls were not exposed for hours at high HCN levels. The gas was forcibly evacuated soon after the victims died, within minutes, to keep the killing line moving. This is well supported by SS technical correspondence.
On this, Rudolf runs two simulations to calculate masonry exposure times, ie the direct exposure time for the walls to inferface with HcN, and the expected hydrogen cyanide concentrations. The two simulations are run at 14 minutes and 70 minutes respectively.
Rudolf ran two simulations at 14-min and 70-min exposure cases to compare. In his simulations, he used equilibrium values which assumed the walls had time to reach steady-state cyanide uptake.

But in the real world, walls do not absorb gas instantly. The Zyklon B outgassing + ventilation created highly non-steady conditions which would make Rudolf's use of equilibrium values improper.

The reaction to make stable iron cyanide (Prussian Blue) is slow, diffusion-limited, and depends on moisture and pH.
So even if local air had residual HCN, the time + surface area + cleaning mean only a fraction ever reacts. That’s why tests found trace cyanide but no deep pigment.
From Rudolf:
As a result of the high moisture content of these unheated underground
morgues, one can see that even with such short gassing times, the walls of a
homicidal gas chamber accumulate a hydrogen-cyanide content which would
be quite comparable to that of a disinfestation chamber. Much less hydrogen
cyanide in the quasi-stationary condition of the hypothetical homicidal “gas
chambers” could only be expected, if one were to assume absurdly short and
technically unfeasible gassing times, the application of very small amounts of
Zyklon B, or only very few gassings at all

Chemistry of Auschwitz: Section7.3.2.3. Simulation Calculations

2 - see above

3 - moisture accelerates the formation of PB not impedes it - Green concedes this point.
Moisture helps cyanide penetrate pores, but does not automatically mean high pigment formation. In order to form stable Prussian blue pigmentation, you also need enough free ferrous (Fe²⁺) iron ions exposed and enough time for the iron ion exchange. You also need an alkaline but not overly acidic environment. And the concrete and lime plaster walls do not have enough freely available Fe²⁺. They have some iron impurities but not like brick.
4 - Washing the walls will only be possible after the full evacuation of the room of a) all the HcN and b) all the bodies. Focusing on b) alone, this would be hours, given that the elevator lift could only support 6 bodies at a time. This time-delay betrays the point, that Prussian Blue was prevented from forming on the walls, and says nothing about the upper walls / ceiling, which as i mentioned before, is where the HcN would tend to accumulate as it is less dense than air.
Removal crews worked while the gas chamber was ventilated. The forced ventilation system was designed to flush out gas quickly enough for Sonderkommando to enter with only gas masks or none at all within ~30 minutes. Practically, the sequence involved gassing (~20–30 min), ventilation with fans on full which cleared the gas in ~20–30 min. The Sonderkommando entered, doors open, roof hatches open which allowed more airflow and the corpses were dragged out continuously. The actual toxic HCN concentration near the walls and ceiling dropped fast — because forced draft + multiple exit points. Ultimately, washing was minor compared to the more decisive chemical constraints: insufficient time, unsuitable substrate, and lower repeated dose.
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by HansHill »

ConfusedJew wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:55 pm .
I will respond to the chemistry aspects here when I get a bit of time, likely tomorrow. This line of conversation is far more fruitful in my opinion than where Bombsaway's line of reasoning is leading to.

Just so we are all clear - in assessing the situation with CJ: Am i correct in saying you, CJ, are happy to proceed with the line of reasoning that the masonry was exposed directly to HcN and the reasons listed above explain the failure for PB to form? That is to say, you won't strategically shift to the paint-as-physical-barrier hypothesis once these chemistry parameters are addressed?

If you wish to retreat to BA's paint hypothesis please do so, however that will render the chemistry arguments as redundant and we'll save the time.
b
bombsaway
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by bombsaway »

HansHill wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:46 pm
bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:40 pm It's an open question.
Again fair enough - however it's also mutually exclusive to the types of arguments that Confused Jew's LLM, Markiewicz, Green etc tend to make, in that PB failed to form in the context of the masonry's direct exposure to HcN due to some parameter or another.

To introduce the "open question" that the masonry in fact never interfaced with the HcN at all, belies the weaknesses of their arguments and looks an awful lot like a retreat to tactical nihilism, and is furthermore, unfalsifiable.

**Edit** In short, if the HcN never actually interfaced directly with the masonry, then all of Confused Jew's talking points are redundant in describing the failure to form, and everything hinges on the existence of this paint (!)
Yeah maybe, but the paint is super plausible given the Nazis obviously wouldn't have wanted weird blue stains on the wall. I don't know enough about the chemistry to say that it could ONLY be the paint, this is kind of a fallback tbh. Even if Green, Markiewicz are dead wrong, there is still this very possibility, made all the more plausible by the fact the Nazis would have taken some measure (and this is a very easy one to take) if they thought staining was inevitable, as you do. The protective paint "professionally applied" at Dachau had seemingly no function other than aesthetics.
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by Archie »

bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:40 pm It's an open question. I haven't seen anything about paint or non paint in the krema ruins. After decades of exposure to the elements how easy would it be to even find out what paint was used?

I'm making the argument that it's plausible a special paint was used, not making any definite statements. Your argument is overall, gassings are impossible, so it's up to you show that.
You have made this speculation multiple times before. You were rebutted and had no response. You have had months to look into this. Well? Have you found any evidence at all to support this speculation of yours that LK1 was coated with some special waterproof paint which is unmentioned in any known source and which was at some point removed?
b
bombsaway
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by bombsaway »

Archie wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 5:21 pm
bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:40 pm It's an open question. I haven't seen anything about paint or non paint in the krema ruins. After decades of exposure to the elements how easy would it be to even find out what paint was used?

I'm making the argument that it's plausible a special paint was used, not making any definite statements. Your argument is overall, gassings are impossible, so it's up to you show that.
You have made this speculation multiple times before. You were rebutted and had no response. You have had months to look into this. Well? Have you found any evidence at all to support this speculation of yours that LK1 was coated with some special waterproof paint which is unmentioned in any known source and which was at some point removed?
No one, revisionist or not, has looked for the special paint, or any paint. That's why I think it's just a question. You are asserting impossibility, which means that you have to account for all likely scenarios.

Remember how with resettlement, you guys speculated about how forces within the media and publishing houses had tight control and were preventing accounts being published that might contradict the mainstream narrative of 'no resettlement'? That's what I'm doing here, except the possibility I am raising is much more plausible. It would be trivial for the Nazis to coat the gas chamber walls with paint to uphold their illusion of shower rooms. They did it for purely aesthetic reasons elsewhere.
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 6:25 pm
Archie wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 5:21 pm
bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 4:40 pm It's an open question. I haven't seen anything about paint or non paint in the krema ruins. After decades of exposure to the elements how easy would it be to even find out what paint was used?

I'm making the argument that it's plausible a special paint was used, not making any definite statements. Your argument is overall, gassings are impossible, so it's up to you show that.
You have made this speculation multiple times before. You were rebutted and had no response. You have had months to look into this. Well? Have you found any evidence at all to support this speculation of yours that LK1 was coated with some special waterproof paint which is unmentioned in any known source and which was at some point removed?
No one, revisionist or not, has looked for the special paint, or any paint. That's why I think it's just a question. You are asserting impossibility, which means that you have to account for all likely scenarios.

…the possibility I am raising is …plausible. It would be trivial for the Nazis to coat the gas chamber walls with paint to uphold their illusion of shower rooms. They did it for purely aesthetic reasons elsewhere.
You dodged Archie’s point. Which is WHY haven’t YOU done some research and looked into it? It’s not like it is for revisionists where all and any info that refutes the mass-gassing allegation is: censored; off-limits to revisionists researching; destroyed.

Here is his question again:

“Have you found any evidence at all to support this speculation of yours that LK1 was coated with some special waterproof paint which is unmentioned in any known source and which was at some point removed?”

I think this ‘dodge’ reply — when added to all your others — shows that you are another time-waster who is not discussing in good faith. Ermmmm… just like the other two time-wasting true-believers.
b
bombsaway
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by bombsaway »

Wahrheitssucher wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 6:35 pm
bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 6:25 pm
Archie wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 5:21 pm

You have made this speculation multiple times before. You were rebutted and had no response. You have had months to look into this. Well? Have you found any evidence at all to support this speculation of yours that LK1 was coated with some special waterproof paint which is unmentioned in any known source and which was at some point removed?
No one, revisionist or not, has looked for the special paint, or any paint. That's why I think it's just a question. You are asserting impossibility, which means that you have to account for all likely scenarios.

…the possibility I am raising is …plausible. It would be trivial for the Nazis to coat the gas chamber walls with paint to uphold their illusion of shower rooms. They did it for purely aesthetic reasons elsewhere.
You dodged Archie’s point. Which is WHY haven’t YOU done some research and looked into it? It’s not like it is for revisionists where all and any info that refutes the mass-gassing allegation is: censored; off-limits to revisionists researching; destroyed.

Here is his question again:

“Have you found any evidence at all to support this speculation of yours that LK1 was coated with some special waterproof paint which is unmentioned in any known source and which was at some point removed?”

I think this ‘dodge’ reply — when added to all your others — shows that you are another time-waster who is not discussing in good faith. Ermmmm… just like the other two time-wasting true-believers.
I did do some research on paint on the walls and couldn't find anything which would confirm or rebut that possibility. No evidence it was removed by the Germans, or it had eroded away after decades of outside exposure, destroyed in the demolition, or it's still there in small quantities.

Where is your research on the "forces" stopping publishing houses from releasing memoirs that from the 1.5 million Reinhardt Jews? (you think were resettled there) You believe something like this happened with no evidence.

The difference between you guys and me, I would say, is that my speculations are much more plausible.
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by Archie »

bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 6:58 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 6:35 pm
bombsaway wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 6:25 pm

No one, revisionist or not, has looked for the special paint, or any paint. That's why I think it's just a question. You are asserting impossibility, which means that you have to account for all likely scenarios.

…the possibility I am raising is …plausible. It would be trivial for the Nazis to coat the gas chamber walls with paint to uphold their illusion of shower rooms. They did it for purely aesthetic reasons elsewhere.
You dodged Archie’s point. Which is WHY haven’t YOU done some research and looked into it? It’s not like it is for revisionists where all and any info that refutes the mass-gassing allegation is: censored; off-limits to revisionists researching; destroyed.

Here is his question again:

“Have you found any evidence at all to support this speculation of yours that LK1 was coated with some special waterproof paint which is unmentioned in any known source and which was at some point removed?”

I think this ‘dodge’ reply — when added to all your others — shows that you are another time-waster who is not discussing in good faith. Ermmmm… just like the other two time-wasting true-believers.
I did do some research on paint on the walls and couldn't find anything which would confirm or rebut that possibility. No evidence it was removed by the Germans, or it had eroded away after decades of outside exposure, destroyed in the demolition, or it's still there in small quantities.

Where is your research on the "forces" stopping publishing houses from releasing memoirs that from the 1.5 million Reinhardt Jews? (you think were resettled there) You believe something like this happened with no evidence.

The difference between you guys and me, I would say, is that my speculations are much more plausible.
You made this bogus argument in March
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=7062&#p7062
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=7069&#p7069

And even earlier in Dec 2024
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=1819&#p1819

It seems that in these 6 months you have made no progress and are doing your usual thing of demanding that we 100% disprove all of your baseless speculations.

As far as I can tell, you are literally the only person who claims that the interior of LK1 was coated top to bottom with special waterproof paint. "Maybe."

Back in December I pointed out to you that by all accounts there is no such paint on the walls in these ruins. I will requote Rudolf's description for you which you have never addressed.
The walls of the morgue consist of double brick masonry with a layer of waterproofing in between for insulation (ibid., pp. 325, 327). The interior walls are plastered with a hard, cement-rich material, the ceiling and support pillars of reinforced concrete show the marks of wooden planking and are therefore not plastered. The roof, made of reinforced concrete, is insulated on the outside by a layer of tar, which is protected from environmental and mechanical damage by a rather thin, screed-like layer of cement covering it. The layers of tar both on top of the roof as well as between the two brick walls were indispensable as a water barrier due to the high groundwater in the swampy region of Birkenau. Both morgues had several drains. (Chemistry of Auschwitz, 114)
I say this is a completely settled point. If the walls were painted, somebody would have noticed by now. I don't consider this an "open question" unless you can point to some published opinion from someone other than yourself disputing the above. As far as the Dachau fumigation chambers, more research could be done on the properties of the particular paint used there, but it's of limited relevance as LK1 did not have that paint and so per force this cannot be the explanation for the lack of Prussian blue in LK1.
C
ConfusedJew
Posts: 444
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 2:36 pm

Re: A request to Confused Jew

Post by ConfusedJew »

HansHill wrote: Sat Jun 14, 2025 5:05 pm
I will respond to the chemistry aspects here when I get a bit of time, likely tomorrow. This line of conversation is far more fruitful in my opinion than where Bombsaway's line of reasoning is leading to.

Just so we are all clear - in assessing the situation with CJ: Am i correct in saying you, CJ, are happy to proceed with the line of reasoning that the masonry was exposed directly to HcN and the reasons listed above explain the failure for PB to form? That is to say, you won't strategically shift to the paint-as-physical-barrier hypothesis once these chemistry parameters are addressed?

If you wish to retreat to BA's paint hypothesis please do so, however that will render the chemistry arguments as redundant and we'll save the time.
From what I am seeing, the vast majority of the credible evidence points to the masonry being directly exposed to the HcN.

German blueprints, survivor and perpetrator testimony, and SS architectural records all confirm that the gas chambers were standard masonry or concrete structures — not specially lined or hermetically painted to block gas.

We can never be 100% certain about anything, but my research points to that being like 99% likely to be the case.
Post Reply