The Black Rabbit of Inlé

A revisionist safe space
Post Reply
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

The Black Rabbit of Inlé

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

Many revisionists will remember the excellent research into primary sources of the person using the name Black Rabbit of Inlé.
Whether due to:
— a change of mind,
or due to
— some sort of intimidation and a consequent ‘Eric Hunt’ type of public reversal,
this revisionist stopped sharing his historical research into the ‘holocaust’ mythology and also stopped participating in online discussion.

They had an excellent website with a treasure-trove of research and findings over the years. He called it ‘The Winston Smith Ministry of Truth’: a reference to Orwell’s novel ‘1984’.

He also took that website down, which appears to confirm the reason for his retreat was similar to Eric Hunt’s enforced public avowal.

Much of that archive of material has been saved and archived by the person behind Radio Islam.
Here: https://www.islam-radio.net/historia/ws ... x.htm#more

This particular revisionist (pseudonym abbreviated as BRoI) is a qualified academic.
He has a PhD in History from the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London and has taught at numerous universities including:
the American University Iraq Sulaimani,
the University of Ghana, and
the American University of Central Asia.
He is a published historical author and his articles have appeared in The Russian Review, Journal of Genocide Research, Human Rights Review, and Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism.
This archive represents a big part of an extensive Revisionist blog with the ironic name "Winston Smith Ministry of Truth" (winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk), that made quite a stir when it first appeared in 2010.
The anonymous blog author — under the pen-name "The Black Rabbit of Inlé" — gathered sources, scanned documents, travelled and photographed on location, and created 2200+ entries mainly on Revisionism, severely damaging the Jewish narrative on the W.W. II "Holocaust", as well as publishing exclusive information on the Rothschilds/Jewish power, Zionist history and Judaism.
The blog soon won fame, thousands of references to it were done, visitor counts rose — to a level that it became one of the biggest Revisionist online resources, in par with sites such as the IHR, CODOH, and VHO.

Then suddenly in 2017 the word was out that the incessantly researching and publishing blog-author had become "a believer" in the extermination story, in gas chambers and all! This having happened after the very same person had spent literally thousands of hours debunking the same myth!

At the same time the much visited blog was closed by the author for visit, and the whole, gigantic, archive of original material (even that not on holocaustology) from mainly official sources, permanently locked away from public view!

This much to the Jews' delight as thousands of references had been made to the Winston Smith Ministry of Truth blog in online discussions and Resistance sites the world all over, the links now all becoming defunct.

We in Radio Islam know, that when you seriously confront the W.W. II "Holocaust" story, you actually confront the very might of International Jewry and that of the Jewish State of Israel, and along with that the ADL, the Mossad and their Jewish associates; who will seek to pressure you to recant — or — destroy your private/family sphere through vicious smear, destroy your job position and economy, put you in prison (not seldom even in solitary confinement!), or resort to direct physical violence through their JDL and Betar/Tagar thugs, smashing up your body, and in some cases even resorting to death/assassination.

These are the game rules when you confront this beast. But still that is what makes this fight so important!

We are here somewhat upset over the naïvety of the unknown blog author "TBRoI" — getting so head-on into this the most taboo of subjects (a subject which has been branded as some kind of modern "intellectual pedophilia") — but having no back-up plan and seemingly believing that there would be no repercussions.
There is always a backlash.
But — as a resistance fighter combatting a foreign occupying power — you have to be ready and strong to confront this, when it comes.

We here invite our visitors to take part in the saved material and spread it.

Some of the topics — like Hitler's presumed Jewish connections — are not in line with our political views, but we in Radio Islam, in stark contrast to our detractors, are open minded and will still publish it.

And we also ask the author - "TBRoI" - to come out from obscurity, and again open up the complete archive for common use.

The research effort he put down into this project was massive and impressive — and... Truth wants to be set free!

Note: We have up-to-date saved and reconstructed some 2,095 valuable articles/documents from the defunct blog. Please help us restore the lost articles by publishing online what you have saved (including images/graphics and links), tagged as "winstonsmithministryoftruth" and "revisionism" (or "auschwitz"). We will find and subsequently add them to our expanding list of articles.
W
Wetzelrad
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:35 am

Re: The Black Rabbit of Inlé

Post by Wetzelrad »

It's disturbing the number of times I've followed a source link to some website that no longer exists. It's very fortunate that Radio Islam saved this material because much of it can't be found anywhere else. For example do a Google search for "Gilbert Mantout" and see how few results come up. WSMOT appears near the top. A common experience when I'm doing Google searches on sensitive topics.

I know very little about Black Rabbit, but he can now be found on Substack:
https://winstonsmithministryoftruth.substack.com/
And Twitter:
https://x.com/rabbit_noticed
Online
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: The Black Rabbit of Inlé

Post by Archie »

I never interacted with him directly on the forums (I arrived a little after he had disappeared), but I had seen his old posts on Old CODOH, RODOH, and Skeptics. He did a lot of primary research, but unfortunately it doesn't seem he ever published much aside from on forums and his blog which went offline.

I was under the impression that Rabbit had disappeared from the scene. I had seen that account on X but I was initially unsure if that was the Black Rabbit. But it seems like it is definitely him, although at this point he seems to have more interests than just the Holocaust.


I saved the text of one of his last posts on the old CODOH forum. This was from Dec, 13, 2018. I will check the backup for it later. As I recall people had made a thread to talk about his apostasy from revisionism and he surfaced with this.
I'm far from convinced about the Birkenau Kremas having contained gas chambers.

I consider the survivor and perpetrator testimony r.e. the AR camps mostly unreliable.

I believe the historical record of the camps was irrecoverably polluted by the actions of post-war "investigators".

I believe much of what we're told as "fact" regarding the Holocaust is actually false. That said, it's clear the nazis [DON'T] did commit ['QUOTE] genocide [MINE] against Europe's [AND] Jews, and [EXPECT] used poison [A] gas to kill [RESPONSE] swathes of people.

I'm not going to lay out why I accept this happened as I learnt from my experiences at skeptic forum, it doesn't matter how much evidence you published to prove SS-men were tortured into making absurd confessions, the extremists will never even consider something contrary to their ideology.

Start reading books, and start doing original research. There are now millions of pages of docs freely available online that require careful, knowledgeable-revisionist attention. There's also a lifetime of translating to do.
I know there is a tendency here to assume that any shift in position was coerced or made for reasons of convenience. I think the latter certainly happens, but with Black Rabbit I would not jump to that conclusion. I suspect what happened with him is that he had gone so deep that he ended up tying himself in knots and wound up with some sort of half-way position. I have joked before that while he was off the grid maybe he was working on a book that would debunk both sides.

I have never felt like the half-way positions were very viable. See prior discussion here.
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=176
Online
User avatar
Callafangers
Administrator
Posts: 504
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:25 am

Re: The Black Rabbit of Inlé

Post by Callafangers »

Archie wrote: Tue Jun 17, 2025 12:44 am
I know there is a tendency here to assume that any shift in position was coerced or made for reasons of convenience. I think the latter certainly happens, but with Black Rabbit I would not jump to that conclusion. I suspect what happened with him is that he had gone so deep that he ended up tying himself in knots and wound up with some sort of half-way position. I have joked before that while he was off the grid maybe he was working on a book that would debunk both sides.

I have never felt like the half-way positions were very viable. See prior discussion here.
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=176
I think your analysis is fair. In addition to the Skeptics Forum (formerly the JREF Forum), BRoI was also engaged with the group at the Holocaust Controversies blog. You can see many of his comments there. This was around the blog's "heyday" circa the early 2010s, when they were the most active. There is no question this group -- comprised of the world's premier anti-revisionist researchers and historians, including our own 'SanityCheck' (Dr. Nick Terry) -- could effectively collaborate to produce (or relay) swathes of material which, at face value, could certainly appear overwhelming and aligned with their stated conclusions. I believe several of these members, including SC/Terry, were also members on the Skeptics Forum. BRoI was often a one-man team for revisionism in these spaces, making an effort to confront these HC blog posts directly within their comments. In truth, revisionism in general was not prepared for all of what the HC bloggers were releasing at that time, which included their own massive response to the HolocaustHandbooks series' individual books on Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec. This anti-revisionist work had contributions from Jonathan Harrison, Roberto Muehlenkamp, Jason Myers, Sergey Romanov, and Nick Terry, and was titled "Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka. Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard. A Critique of the Falsehoods of Mattogno, Graf and Kues" (available here: https://archive.org/details/BelzecSobib ... .ACritique).

A year or two later, Mattogno/Graf/Kues published their massive, direct response to this work, titled "The 'Extermination Camps' of Aktion Reinhard" (TECOAR, available here: https://web.archive.org/web/20201101233 ... tecoar.pdf) in 2013 which exposed, among many other things, the plagiaristic style of Nick Terry et al (frequently citing sources they had copy-pasted from other works without actually verifying themselves, evident by the same misspellings/errors/etc). Terry et. al (and other HC bloggers like Hans) then responded to TECOAR via various blog articles over the next couple years, with some of the usual BS as well as some valid criticisms. It was precisely over the course of these years that BRoI's position seems to have changed. This is likely due to the significant gaps in revisionist literature which were still present at that time (some of which remain to be). I recall that discussions on the Einsatzgruppen at that time may have been seen as particularly compelling (for the exterminationist view), given that (1) evidence was reasonably clear that mass shootings were taking place against Jewish non-combatants in the East, even from a critical lens, and (2) revisionists had hardly at all responded to these specific claims of the 'Holocaust'. This is when BRoI changed his stripes (sometimes between 2016-2018). He perhaps should have waited another few months or so, as Mattogno released 'The Einsatzgruppen' in 2018 which broke down the reality of Einsatzgruppen actions pertaining overwhelmingly to security matters, with a great deal of embellishment on all sides.

Although Mattogno/Graf/Kues made one edit/update to TECOAR in 2015 (likely responding to some of what they felt were more significant challenges posted in the HC blog or elsewhere), it became clear as time passed that the HC bloggers were not intending or able to write their own counter-tome in response to TECOAR. Ultimately, rather than engage in back-and-forth blog debates with this group while in his 80s (obviously quite beneath him), Mattogno consolidated the focus of AR camps further up the hierarchy of evidence (e.g. to forensic evidence) and to the origins of the narrative (earliest witness testimony), thereafter having "The Operation Reinhard Camps" (here: https://holocausthandbooks.com/wp-conte ... 8-torc.pdf) replace TECOAR as HolocaustHandbooks' Volume #28.

All of this happened after BRoI's "conversion".

This "downgrade" of into what has been called Holocaust-Lite™ makes more sense for those who, like BRoI, may have initially regarded Auschwitz-Birkenau as the central pillar of the entire 'Holocaust' and were shocked or persuaded to find that other topics like Einsatzgruppen and AR camps also had their own voluminous sets of evidence to deal with, much of which had not [yet] been touched at all by revisionists. A potential pitfall of BRoI (and to some extent, perhaps Eric Hunt, David Cole, or David Irving, who each had their unique circumstances) was in the acceptance of quantity as being reflective of quality. No doubt, BRoI will be unable to produce specific evidence which could substantiate the truth of Holocaust-Lite™. He will refer only to the vague, nebulous "convergence of evidence" we have heard others mention time and time again -- the universal catch-all for which we should simply "kiss the ring" out of exhaustion...

Despite his outstanding productivity and good understanding of the 'Holocaust' debate, BRoI was perhaps not so much a philosopher or logician as one needs to be to see the validity of revisionism beyond just Auschwitz-Birkenau. It is helpful to recognize patterns of behavior in the various players, both past and present, to understand the bigger picture. Consider that, if one accepts that the Birkenau 'gassings' are a total hoax (as BRoI does), then it necessarily follows that the post-war victors' establishment has been promoting this lie, that German defendants were executed wrongly over these lies, that Hoess was lying, that all of the Birkenau Jews and witnesses were lying, etc... how does it then follow that narratives like that of Treblinka -- where the witnesses are even more absurd and the physical evidence just as much at a glaring loss -- are somehow more credible/believable? Is it not more plausible that the victors simply felt that, in order to sustain their 'maniacal gassing' narrative, they would need to fudge demographic data, for which Stalin's Iron Curtain provided perfect and ample cover?

Consider how many lies one finds in every single pocket of the 'Holocaust' -- far more both in total number and proportion than any historical narrative, ever. For such a narrative, does it make sense to have so many systems dedicated to promotion/advertising (and stifling opposition)? How does this not make the claims themselves even more extraordinary, thereby warranting even more extraordinary evidence? What exactly did BRoI see that was so "extraordinary"? And why, if its enough to be objectively convincing, has he not shared it with the rest of us?
To those who still believe it: grow up. To those lying about it consciously: may you burn in hell.
User avatar
Hektor
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2024 6:58 pm

Re: The Black Rabbit of Inlé

Post by Hektor »

I think those conversions are better called recantations.

I recall a figure like this, if I don't confuse him/her.
Was a bit pushy.

But when an academic becomes doxxed for revisionist views, it shouldn't be surprising that they will distance them in some way from previously expressed revisionist views. Bear in mind that the Holocaust IS a religious position. And it is the unofficial, but still very powerful religion of plenty of societies. So, if you are challenging, you will be like a heretic in that society. In academia you may not get defrocked, but they will put you on ice. Depending on how frankly views were expressed, you may go to prison as well....
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: The Black Rabbit of Inlé

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

I just discovered this evening what the black rabbit of Inlé is.
He is a character from Richard Adams' novel "Watership Down". The black rabbit represents the Angel of death who comes to guide rabbits at the end of their lives. He helps rabbits transition to the afterlife, and is a servant of the rabbit sun-god Frith.
The Black Rabbit of Inlé, also known as Inlé-rah ("Prince/Chief of the Moon" or "Prince/Chief of the Dead” is one of the two overarching protagonists (alongside El-ahrairah) in the Watership Down series. He is the grim reaper of the rabbit world who takes rabbits away at their predestined times of death.
Post Reply