Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

For more adversarial interactions
K
Keen
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:24 pm
Keen wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:15 pm
bombsaway wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:11 pm

As a discovered mass grave
I don't believe that any mass graves have been discovered at Belzec.

But you allege that they have:
H - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??

bombsaway: True.
Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
because I don't think Kola was incompetent at his job or lying , though it's possible he was

bombsaway, you have made the following allegation:
H - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??

bombsaway: True.
Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Online
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by bombsaway »

Keen wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:04 pm
bombsaway wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:24 pm
Keen wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:15 pm

I don't believe that any mass graves have been discovered at Belzec.

But you allege that they have:



Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
because I don't think Kola was incompetent at his job or lying , though it's possible he was

bombsaway, you have made the following allegation:
H - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??

bombsaway: True.
Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
I guess we could say the archeologists claim to have discovered graves, and I believe them. You don't. That's ok but that's the end of the line for us.
K
Keen
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:07 pm
Keen wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:04 pm
bombsaway wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:24 pm

because I don't think Kola was incompetent at his job or lying , though it's possible he was

bombsaway, you have made the following allegation:
H - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??

bombsaway: True.
Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
I guess we could say the archeologists claim to have discovered graves, and I believe them. You don't. That's ok but that's the end of the line for us.
bombsaway, you have made the following allegation:
H - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??

bombsaway: True.
Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
K
Keen
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

bombsaway:
That's the end of the line for us.
You're running away already?

But bombsaway, you didn't even prove the existence of one grave.

Not one!

Oh well:

Image
Online
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by bombsaway »

So what? Are the "graves" proven to not exist?
Post Reply