CJ appears to be someone who because they have had their feelings hurt, now isn’t interested in learning anything but only in trying to offend others back, in revenge.Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 9:41 amHow to interpret inconsistencies in evidence is to gain as wide an understanding of all the available evidence as possible, and WITHOUT favouring any preconceived conclusions and by being alert to any possible subliminal confirmation biases that one might have. This requires some self-awareness and an ability to read and assimilate arguments and viewpoints that contradict one’s own current understanding with fairness and honesty.ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 3:50 am I'm seeing two big issues come up that hopefully you guys can help me understand better.
1. There is a ton of different pieces of evidence, in my opinion, all pointing to the same narrative. What I see happening here is that people cherry pick issues with individual pieces of evidence that don't fully invalidate those individual artifacts or testimonies, let alone the entire body of evidence.
In general, how do you guys think about inconsistencies in evidence and how to interpret that? I just think these issues are blown out of proportion again and again so I'm looking for some kind of meta heuristic to be more objective about these things and reduce the bias in discussions, which we all have to some extent.
With the emotionally-loaded ‘holocaust’ mass-gassing narrative that means being open to views that we each have had decades of indoctrination into rejecting totally. It requires being able to temporarily set aside that conditioning and overcome the training that insists ‘good’ people should have a repulsion and a ‘healthy’ resistance to any arguments or doubts of the official narrative.
If one is unable to do this, they will not be able to understand let alone ‘try on’ contrary viewpoints and understandings.
1.ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 3:50 am 2. If this is just a hoax or postwar narrative, how is it possible for all these different fake sources to have come up with different people that were mostly disconnected during and after the war? I don't see how it's physically possible for so many different people to fabricate so much evidence and testimonies without coordinating. Can you explain that to me? I don't think anything like that has ever happened before in the history of the world.
Firstly, it wasn’t only a post-war narrative. It was concocted as ‘atrocity’ propaganda during the war. It is called psy-op warfare. That is short for ‘psychological-operations’. The British head of that was Victor Cavendish-Bentinck. One of his chief operatives was a Jew of Australian and German origins and upbringing/education.
This guy:
If you don’t know who that is, then be open to the idea that you yourself are the unwitting victim of a very skillful psy-op deception.
2.
Secondly your question is based upon a false premise. Viz. it does NOT require so many people to fabricate the initial psy-op deception. Once it is in place and disseminated, then human nature does the rest. This is a well-documented and confirmable human phenomena called ‘group conformity’.
3.
Thirdly, here is another example of millions of people believing, defending and repeating a fantastic and non-credible belief. It is the one about the virgin-birth of some dude from Galilee who could walk on water, could bring rotting corpses back to life, who lived and died two thousand years ago, yet who it is widely believed has been — and is STILL — appearing to people (inside their heads) and giving them messages, etc.
That would explain why discussing how to most accurately interpret ‘evidence’ is no longer pretended to be of interest and everyone here is now dismissed collectively as dastardly ‘deniers’.
More evidence that CJ was never genuinely interested in actually understanding the revisionist arguments and how the holocaust hoax has been created and perpetuated is the ignoring of the above reference to Sefton Delmer, a key figure in British black propaganda during World War II who played a major role in psychological warfare operations against the Axis war-effort. Delmer was part of the Political Warfare Executive (PWE).
I have a question for the CODOH forum board:
After the war it appears it was he who had a conversation in fluent German with a German Professor where he admitted the spreading of atrocity propaganda, misinformation and disinformation in order to confuse, demoralise and create great guilt in the German population.
I can’t access the quote.
Anyone here know the quote I’m referring to?
It mentions creating a deception of such abhorrence that everyone the world over would revile the German people. It also mentions regularly ‘mowing the lawn’ as a metaphor for maintaining the deception.