Off to a bit of a shakey startConfusedJew wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 4:58 pm There were a lot of things that had to happen in order for Prussian Blue to form.
1. First the hydrogen cyanide gas has to exist.
Off to a bit of a shakey startConfusedJew wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 4:58 pm There were a lot of things that had to happen in order for Prussian Blue to form.
1. First the hydrogen cyanide gas has to exist.
Assume that they hypothetically used HCN gas because many of the arguments on here expect that absence of Prussian Blue proves that there was never any gas. That argument is flawed so I want to dismantle that piece and then I'll move on to other ones.HansHill wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 5:59 pmOff to a bit of a shakey startConfusedJew wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 4:58 pm There were a lot of things that had to happen in order for Prussian Blue to form.
1. First the hydrogen cyanide gas has to exist.
What are your sources for this claim CJ? Please, do list testimony that is consistent with the claim here.ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 6:09 pm
1. Why do you still think that Prussian Blue might have shown up if Nazis and Sonderkommando reported washing and disinfecting the walls of the gas chambers?
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
I beg your pardon? Can you clarify this?ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 7:43 pm Let me compile a list for you and get back to you on this but eyewitness testimony is not even necessary. Obviously they are going to hose the place down if there are a ton of dead bodies in there so you wouldn't expect to see Prussian Blue.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
It's crucial that you find testimony published or evidenced before Rudolf published his own work in the 1990s, which is where it was first exposed that the FeCN levels were far below what should be expected if gassings indeed occurred. There have been one or two 'eyewitnesses' who claimed later (in the mid-90s and early-00s) that 'whitewashing' occurred (such as Daniel Bennahmias), but this was obviously damage control for the narrative, as no such testimony exists prior to Rudolf's findings becoming known.ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 7:43 pm Let me compile a list for you and get back to you on this but eyewitness testimony is not even necessary. Obviously they are going to hose the place down if there are a ton of dead bodies in there so you wouldn't expect to see Prussian Blue.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Wernik was at Treblinka where Zyklon B wasn't said to be used. He only mentions that they washed off the floor, which would be appropriate in this case since that's where a lot of excrement/body fluid would be. I don't think that Wernik is a reliable witness regardless. The claims made in his book "A Year in Treblinka" are simply ridiculous.ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:40 pm Jankiel Wernik - "It was a room. The floor was somewhat sloping when the people inside were suffocated, they used to wash the floor with a hosepipe or a bucket of water. When they removed the bodies, they had been suffocated."
First of all, that isn't even Abraham's quote. It's his brother Szlama's (Shlomo). Anyways, they aren't reliable witnesses either. The claims they make are absurd, and are demonstrated to be here: https://holocaustencyclopedia.com/witne ... on-szlama/. I point this out because if we are unable to determine what he says is true or not since his account has some truth and (mostly) falsehood mixed in, then there is no reason to take this quote with certainty.ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:40 pm Abraham Dragon - "After the bodies were taken out we were forced to clean the shack, wash the floor with water, spread sawdust and white-wash the walls. The shack was divided inside into four cells: the largest could contain up to 1,200 people, the second 700, the third 400, and the fourth 200 to 250 people. In the wall of the largest cell there were two lattices. The other three had but one lattice."
Gabbai is also unreliable for a multitude of reasons (https://holocaustencyclopedia.com/witne ... dario/301/). The claim here itself though is interesting because he doesn't really specify where the paint goes. The floor? The wall? How are we supposed to know that the paint was covering up Prussian Blue staining? Did Gabbai even know that Prussian Blue formed? Because he specifically says here that they are cleaning up blood. I was unaware that they supposedly used paint until now.ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:40 pm Dario Gabbai - "Once the gas chambers were cleared out they had to be hosed down from all traces of blood and quickly white-washed with quick-dry paint. This step was crucial and done after each transport to keep up the deception so that the next batch of victims would not suspect that they were about to be gassed. The whole process took between 2-3 hours each time."
https://holocaustencyclopedia.com/witne ... enryk/676/. I simply ask, again, how are we supposed to take any of this testimony seriously when he tells blatant lies after being interrogated by the Soviets?ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:40 pm Mandelbaum mentioned that when he saw his colleagues transporting corpses in the heat, covered in sweat, exhausted and breathless; they simply switched to lighter work, such as cleaning the gas chamber, and those who had cleaned the room up to that point replaced them during the transport of the corpses.