The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

For more adversarial interactions
S
SanityCheck
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:26 pm

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by SanityCheck »

HansHill wrote: Mon Sep 01, 2025 5:55 pm
SanityCheck wrote: Sun Aug 31, 2025 10:01 pm Arad doesn't count more than 200,000 killed in Belzec and Sobibor in the first half of 1942. That, too, set a precedent for the second half of 1942 when a million were deported.
You're a smart chap so I'll save you the embarrassment of me having to remind you that achieving an instantaneous 10x in any complex industrial or military operation on an international scale like this, is anything but trivial and certainly not taken for granted.
As already noted, it wasn't an 'instantaneous' 10x leap. The first half of 1942 involved two camps, each with three chambers, so that's already more chambers than T4 ever operated simultaneously, without the hassle of fabricating death certificates or writing letters, and simple burial rather than the bottleneck of mobile Kori crematoria.

The same scaling-up can be seen with Sonderkommando Lange, which went from one van to three vans when it set up Chelmno. Also at Birkenau, where one 'bunker' became two, then in 1943 four crematoria with gas chambers were added.

AR also scaled up for the second half of 1942: another camp, and more chambers. More Trawniki guards, too, which came in handy when Treblinka was overloaded in August 1942. Bigger more overcrowded transports so lots more DOA in the summer heat. Bigger workforces, too.
S
SanityCheck
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:26 pm

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by SanityCheck »

A question for revisionists: who provided the escorts for hypothetical 'outgoing' transports from the Reinhardt camps?

Walk us through how that worked with transports of 5000 or more arriving every day at certain moments.
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1281
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by bombsaway »

The "scaling up" is represented in the witness testimonies yes. Notice how these are the criticisms of the orthodox narrative while the revisionist narrative is critiqued by saying, hey there's no evidence for it, and pointing to the mass killing of Jews in the areas where they are supposed to have been sent.

No evidenced instances of Jewish populations being maintained or growing past 1942

Thousands of evidenced instances of Jews being mass killed, working, non working, native and "settlers" from Central and Western Europe (though not Poland)
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 2216
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by Stubble »

SanityCheck wrote: Mon Sep 01, 2025 7:40 pm As already noted, it wasn't an 'instantaneous' 10x leap. The first half of 1942 involved two camps, each with three chambers, so that's already more chambers than T4 ever operated simultaneously, without the hassle of fabricating death certificates or writing letters, and simple burial rather than the bottleneck of mobile Kori crematoria.

The same scaling-up can be seen with Sonderkommando Lange, which went from one van to three vans when it set up Chelmno. Also at Birkenau, where one 'bunker' became two, then in 1943 four crematoria with gas chambers were added.

AR also scaled up for the second half of 1942: another camp, and more chambers. More Trawniki guards, too, which came in handy when Treblinka was overloaded in August 1942. Bigger more overcrowded transports so lots more DOA in the summer heat. Bigger workforces, too.
If the whole point of using people from T4 was to be their prior experience, why didn't the Germans, you know, use people with prior homicidal gassing experience?

Why did they have to reinvent the wheel so many times when they got to Poland? From 'reinventing' the gas van, to 'rediscovering' carbon monoxide, they did this all again. Why?

My suggested answer to this question can be found in my signature.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
S
SanityCheck
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:26 pm

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by SanityCheck »

Stubble wrote: Mon Sep 01, 2025 9:09 pm If the whole point of using people from T4 was to be their prior experience, why didn't the Germans, you know, use people with prior homicidal gassing experience?
Your question makes no sense.

T4 personnel had prior experience working in centres that gassed psychiatric patients. That doesn't mean, however, that the reason for the transfer to Lublin was technical knowledge, it was their availability with the suspension of T4 - while some centres continued because of 14 f 13, most were on the verge of shutting down. .

Brack had by his own account made contact with Globocnik in early autumn 1941, to discuss a fallback T4 centre with the suspension of operations in the Reich. This was evidently a source of inspiration for Globocnik, who together with Himmler got more T4 personnel redirected to Lublin.

Brack had also discussed transferring more classic T4 technology to Riga, thus the 'Vergasungsapparate' note. It is worth noting that the medical authorities in Lemberg-Lwow also appealed to contacts in Berlin evidently seeking to get T4 personnel or support for killing psychiatric patients in the hospital there; this didn't happen, and the patients were starved to death (as happened in second phase euthanasia in Germany). Meanwhile, Sonderkommando Lange were demanded by both von dem Bach-Zelewski for psychiatric hospitals in Belarus (they did not go), while they were authorised to go to Novgorod in northern Russia to clear a psychistric hospital. All of these things are documented, two in intercepted signals (Police Decodes).

SK Lange also made the transition from bottled CO to engine exhaust with the new generation of gas vans being used at Chelmno. This unit was expanded so there were only few veterans of the bottled gas van operations clearing psychiatric hospitals in Poland. SK Kulmhof added a company of Order Police guards to the small inner commando which was Security Police, but also absorbed SS from the resettlement staffs of the Warthegau (Umwandererzentralstelle).

The key personnel transferred to Lublin were the officers Wirth and Stangl, who had commanded T4 centres and came from the police; they had neither a medical background nor technical training. There were other future officers with SS backgrounds, like Kurt Franz and Johann Niemann, who rapidly became deputy commandants.

Other reasons to transfer T4 personnel: to keep them together in the event that T4 resumed later on, because they couldn't really be drafted to the Army since they were 'bearers of secrets', and because they had been desensitised to serial murder.

Talk of 'transfer of technology' grossly exaggerates the sophistication, and this applies when some mainstream historians lazily talk in those terms. Turning on a valve or turning on an engine are not high-tech matters. Having craftsmen experienced in converting rooms to gas chambers, like Erwin Lambert, was of some help but not much above a builder or window fitter in complexity.

There were practices which were transferred to the AR camps, but some came from the KZ system. Kurt Franz served in Buchenwald before the war as a guard corporal and evidently observed enough to institute a KZ-like regime for the Treblinka workforce, by all accounts. The practice of greeting arrivals and trying where possible to deceive them by inviting them to take a shower came from T4, and was easily learned - the Auschwitz SS used it without requiring a T4 choreeographer to orchestrate the event. Other T4 practices used on arrivals from psychiatric hospitals fell away as unnecessary.

There were three trained chemists involved in T4 as well as the engine exhaust experiments that preceded the engine exhaust gas vans: August Becker (T4 and gas vans), Helmut Kallmeyer (T4) and Albert Widmann (T4, Mogilev gassing experiment, testing engine exhaust gas van in Sachsenhausen). Kallmeyer was named as the expert to go to Riga but claimed he never went, he admitted being in Lublin in early 1942 but fell ill with typhus and "couldn't remember" what he did. Interestingly he later met Horst Schumann and his wife in Ghana in the 1960s. Schumann had worked at Grafeneck and Sonnenstein for T4 before conducting X-ray sterilisation experiments at Auschwitz, which Brack had planned/sponsored (this is documented). Becker and Widmann were forthcoming about their roles postwar, Becker already in the 1940s in early West German trials of T4 doctors.

Kallmeyer and Widmann both worked at various times for the Kriminaltechnisches Institut of the Kriminalpolizei, under Amt V of the RSHA. Becker was with another branch of the RSHA before being transferred to T4, and was directed in 1941-2 by the RSHA motor pool section (II D 3A) under Friedrich Pradel, who helped oversee the development of gas vans.

At Belzec, testimonies of Polish workers reported an improvised engine exhaust gas van being tried, while a 1960s dig found a carbon monoxide bottle there. Since they had quite a lot of time before the camp began operations, experimenting with different methods, all pretty simple, is not unreasonable. The camp was a pilot project.

One point which eludes revisionists when they abstractly consider the T4-AR connection is that the T4 personnel with AR all admitted T4 used gassing, they were also remembered as leaving for Lublin by other T4 employees who remained behind, with 500 T4 personnel in Berlin and the centres this is a substantial number of witnesses, while the core of it - the purpose and the use of bottled CO gas - is documented, just like the gas vans are documented. I get that revisionists have testimony cooties but the overlaps are extensive here, and because of documents for Chelmno overlapping further with the gas vans documents, down to vans in the license plate series, this plus the contemporary non-German sources makes it clear why Sonderbehandlung was originally used in the Korherr report, which in turn connects to many cases of Sonderbehandlung, including ones in connection with AR. Since Globocnik noted that the records of AR and the camps were destroyed in his final report, demands for documents explicitly about gassing for the AR camps can go swing, the ties are close enough that the witnesses (especially those who operated the engines at the AR camps) are telling the truth. Meanwhile, the heavy overlap with T4 and from there with gas vans multiplies the size of the 'problem' to be explained away. T4 and the related Aktion 14 f 13 may not have killed nearly as many people, but that can also be said for the use of gas vans to kill Jews outside of Chelmno, which 'achieved' about a tenth of the body count of the AR camps.
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 2216
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by Stubble »

You're missing the point. None of them had experience with homicidal gassings. You'd think if those were a thing, then personnel familiar with the process would exist. They didn't.

Instead you have a truck driver designing and manufacturing the homicidal gas van and the homicidal gas chambers, because, no one else had the experience.

Yes yes, you are kicking back on the 'Kaiser's Koffee Kafe', and saying 'they had the experience. Yet, even as you say this, they apparently didn't share their knowledge with the people putting Aktion Reinhardt (there is a t there) together. Because they had to reinvent the gas van...

Now they are 'keepers of secrets'...

It's gone from 'they were chosen for their experience' to 'experience wasn't necessary because killing large groups of people is easy can can be done by a window fitter'.

That's quite the pivot...
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
User avatar
Callafangers
Administrator
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:25 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by Callafangers »

SanityCheck wrote: Mon Sep 01, 2025 7:19 pm
Callafangers wrote: Mon Sep 01, 2025 1:39 am Putting aside for a moment whether the evidence is indeed still "out there", let me ask the following:
  • Did the victorious powers and their networks in general have the motive to portray a 'Holocaust' (and accompanying Jewish disappearances) post-war?
  • Did the victorious powers and their networks in general have the means (as global superpower networks) to portray a 'Holocaust' (and accompanying Jewish disappearances) post-war?
  • Did the victorious powers and their networks in general have the opportunity to portray a 'Holocaust' (and accompanying Jewish disappearances) post-war?
  • If yes to the above, is there evidence of the victorious powers (with their networks) ever acting in alignment with these motives, means, and opportunity?
If motive, means, opportunity and a pattern of action isn't enough to validate an interpretation that global superpowers have implemented a campaign of evidence destruction and fabrication to shape and redefine national affinities post-war, I'm really not sure what is.

If such a campaign has taken place, it makes perfect sense that certain evidence (e.g. Jewish movement, locations) should be missing from available records. It would be very strange for such records to be located at all, in such a scenario.
I think you're working backwards from your desired conclusion, and also projecting your present attitudes onto the past.
Great opinion but since when are assessment of motive, means, opportunity, and patterns of action/behavior not integral at the start of any investigation?
...he cries out in pain and proceeds to AI-slop-spam and 'pilpul' you...
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1281
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by bombsaway »

Callafangers wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 12:05 am
SanityCheck wrote: Mon Sep 01, 2025 7:19 pm
Callafangers wrote: Mon Sep 01, 2025 1:39 am Putting aside for a moment whether the evidence is indeed still "out there", let me ask the following:
  • Did the victorious powers and their networks in general have the motive to portray a 'Holocaust' (and accompanying Jewish disappearances) post-war?
  • Did the victorious powers and their networks in general have the means (as global superpower networks) to portray a 'Holocaust' (and accompanying Jewish disappearances) post-war?
  • Did the victorious powers and their networks in general have the opportunity to portray a 'Holocaust' (and accompanying Jewish disappearances) post-war?
  • If yes to the above, is there evidence of the victorious powers (with their networks) ever acting in alignment with these motives, means, and opportunity?
If motive, means, opportunity and a pattern of action isn't enough to validate an interpretation that global superpowers have implemented a campaign of evidence destruction and fabrication to shape and redefine national affinities post-war, I'm really not sure what is.

If such a campaign has taken place, it makes perfect sense that certain evidence (e.g. Jewish movement, locations) should be missing from available records. It would be very strange for such records to be located at all, in such a scenario.
I think you're working backwards from your desired conclusion, and also projecting your present attitudes onto the past.
Great opinion but since when are assessment of motive, means, opportunity, and patterns of action/behavior not integral at the start of any investigation?
Do you have any evidence of such things when it comes to the conspiracy you think happened? (concerning mass information suppression + fabrication)

Maybe a document which outlines the plan, how it was being carried out, and motivations for it, something like this?

https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-his ... zel-no365/

Obviously there is revisionist critique of this document and others like it but I bring it up to show a disparity - you are alleging a conspiracy that is not simply not evidenced in this way. It's based on inferred behavior, nothing concrete like the Wetzel note.
User avatar
Callafangers
Administrator
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:25 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by Callafangers »

bombsaway wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 4:24 am
Do you have any evidence of such things when it comes to the conspiracy you think happened? (concerning mass information suppression + fabrication)

Maybe a document which outlines the plan, how it was being carried out, and motivations for it, something like this?

https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-his ... zel-no365/

Obviously there is revisionist critique of this document and others like it but I bring it up to show a disparity - you are alleging a conspiracy that is not simply not evidenced in this way. It's based on inferred behavior, nothing concrete like the Wetzel note.
None of what you just wrote takes away from the victorious powers indisputably having had the motive, means, opportunity and behavior which aligns perfectly with revisionist assertions.
...he cries out in pain and proceeds to AI-slop-spam and 'pilpul' you...
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1281
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by bombsaway »

Callafangers wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 4:52 am
bombsaway wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 4:24 am
Do you have any evidence of such things when it comes to the conspiracy you think happened? (concerning mass information suppression + fabrication)

Maybe a document which outlines the plan, how it was being carried out, and motivations for it, something like this?

https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-his ... zel-no365/

Obviously there is revisionist critique of this document and others like it but I bring it up to show a disparity - you are alleging a conspiracy that is not simply not evidenced in this way. It's based on inferred behavior, nothing concrete like the Wetzel note.
None of what you just wrote takes away from the victorious powers indisputably having had the motive, means, opportunity and behavior which aligns perfectly with revisionist assertions.
In a comparative sense it shows the weakness of the evidence for your conspiracy/conspiracies

But I understand your conspiracy concerns the data having been corrupted/modified/deleted. Maybe, or you've got yourself an unfalsifiable hypothesis, since data is the stuff of history and the basis of all such inquiries.
User avatar
Callafangers
Administrator
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:25 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by Callafangers »

bombsaway wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 4:58 am
In a comparative sense it shows the weakness of the evidence for your conspiracy/conspiracies

But I understand your conspiracy concerns the data having been corrupted/modified/deleted. Maybe, or you've got yourself an unfalsifiable hypothesis, since data is the stuff of history and the basis of all such inquiries.
Interesting you mention non-falsifiability -- what exactly does laws and cultural engineering against 'Holocaust denial' produce?
...he cries out in pain and proceeds to AI-slop-spam and 'pilpul' you...
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1281
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by bombsaway »

Callafangers wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 5:00 am
bombsaway wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 4:58 am
In a comparative sense it shows the weakness of the evidence for your conspiracy/conspiracies

But I understand your conspiracy concerns the data having been corrupted/modified/deleted. Maybe, or you've got yourself an unfalsifiable hypothesis, since data is the stuff of history and the basis of all such inquiries.
Interesting you mention non-falsifiability -- what exactly does laws and cultural engineering against 'Holocaust denial' produce?
You can ask Katyn revisionists about that. They're mirrors of you guys.
User avatar
Callafangers
Administrator
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:25 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by Callafangers »

bombsaway wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 5:05 am
You can ask Katyn revisionists about that. They're mirrors of you guys.
You've still deflected from:
  • 'Holocaust Denial' laws and sociocultural engineering (Hollywood, museums, 'survivor tales' at elementary school campuses, etc.) prevent falsification
  • The victorious powers had motive, means, opportunity, and action patterns that align seamlessly with revisionist assertions
...he cries out in pain and proceeds to AI-slop-spam and 'pilpul' you...
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2674
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by Nessie »

Stubble wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 12:01 am You're missing the point. None of them had experience with homicidal gassings. You'd think if those were a thing, then personnel familiar with the process would exist. They didn't.

Instead you have a truck driver designing and manufacturing the homicidal gas van and the homicidal gas chambers, because, no one else had the experience.

Yes yes, you are kicking back on the 'Kaiser's Koffee Kafe', and saying 'they had the experience. Yet, even as you say this, they apparently didn't share their knowledge with the people putting Aktion Reinhardt (there is a t there) together. Because they had to reinvent the gas van...

Now they are 'keepers of secrets'...

It's gone from 'they were chosen for their experience' to 'experience wasn't necessary because killing large groups of people is easy can can be done by a window fitter'.

That's quite the pivot...
There has been no pivot. It has always been said that T4 personnel were used for AR because they were prepared to work on secretive operations that involved mass killings, including children. They lacked a moral compass and were keepers of secrets. It has never been argued that T4 personnel moved to AR because they were experienced gas chamber designers and builders. AFAIK, no one has been identified as the designer of the T4 or AR gas chambers, as Topf & Sons was identified as the designer of the gas chambers at A-B.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2674
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: The Jews Went to Work? Organization Todt

Post by Nessie »

Callafangers wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 12:05 am ...Great opinion but since when are assessment of motive, means, opportunity, and patterns of action/behavior not integral at the start of any investigation?
So why can I never get a so-called revisionist to do that for the hoax they allege, that started with the Nazis pretending to mass murder millions of Jews, whilst instead secretly keeping them alive?
Post Reply