Convergance of evidence.

For more adversarial interactions
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1281
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by bombsaway »

Keen wrote: Wed May 07, 2025 5:27 pm But it is.
Why is your opinion on something contingent on my view?

This is the report: are they lying or incompetent? Y/N

https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot ... elmno.html
K
Keen
Posts: 663
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Wed May 07, 2025 5:37 pm This is the report: are they lying or incompetent? Y/N

https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot ... elmno.html
It depends on how you answer the questions I asked you. However:

I don't see a huge mass grave with the remains of more than 5 people in it at Chelmno. If there were a huge mass grave with the remains of more than 5 people in it at Chelmno, then Bombsaway would be rubbing my nose in it and collecting the offered reward money for doing so. ( http://thisisaboutscience.com/ ) Therefore, I am 100% certain that there is no huge mass grave with the remains of more than 5 people in it at Chelmno.
bombsaway wrote:

What happened at Chelmno? Multiple graves hundreds of meters long in a remote forest area, full of crushed bones, ash... The total length of these pits equals 161 m. The stretch is made up of 11 pits, each located about 2-3 m from another. The dimensions of the pits vary from 9x7.5 m to 15.50x8.50 m.
Bombsaway:
M - Can you conclusively prove that archaeologists / forensic investigators have actually located / proven the existence of mass graves at Chelmno - Yes. - or - No. - ??

If your answer is - Yes., then:

2 - List all of the Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove actually exist and currently contain at least an iota of human remains: __?__.

7 - List all of the Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

12 - List all of the Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 21 human beings: __?__.

17 - Of the 21 alleged Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question - the one that you can conclusively prove currently contains the most human remains is number: __?__.
If the evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then the claim is obviously false.
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1281
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by bombsaway »

Keen wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 1:07 pm
bombsaway wrote: Wed May 07, 2025 5:37 pm This is the report: are they lying or incompetent? Y/N

https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot ... elmno.html
It depends on how you answer the questions I asked you. However:

Why though, you don't have any thoughts on their statements? Just read what they said and give me your opinion, otherwise you're joining me as a proud member of the 'dodge club'
K
Keen
Posts: 663
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 5:13 pm
Keen wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 1:07 pm
bombsaway wrote: Wed May 07, 2025 5:37 pm This is the report: are they lying or incompetent? Y/N

https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot ... elmno.html
It depends on how you answer the questions I asked you. However:

Why though, you don't have any thoughts on their statements? Just read what they said and give me your opinion, otherwise you're joining me as a proud member of the 'dodge club'
You are all alone in the club.

I don't have an interest in giving you my opinion about the info in that link.

I have an interest in your answers to the questions you're dodging:
bombsaway wrote:

What happened at Chelmno? Multiple graves hundreds of meters long... full of crushed bones, ash... The total length of these pits equals 161 m. The stretch is made up of 11 pits, each located about 2-3 m from another. The dimensions of the pits vary from 9x7.5 m to 15.50x8.50 m.
Bombsaway:
M - Can you conclusively prove that archaeologists / forensic investigators have actually located / proven the existence of mass graves at Chelmno - Yes. - or - No. - ??

If your answer is - Yes., then:

2 - List all of the Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove actually exist and currently contain at least an iota of human remains: __?__.

7 - List all of the Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

12 - List all of the Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 21 human beings: __?__.

17 - Of the 21 alleged Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question - the one that you can conclusively prove currently contains the most human remains is number: __?__.
If the evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then the claim is obviously false.
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1281
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by bombsaway »

Similar to your lack of "interest" (love this exquisite dodge on your part, you truly are a master), I don't have interest in answering your question. What I can say is that I see no reason to believe the archeologists who investigated the Chelmno grave sites are incompetent or lying, therefore mass graves are indicated.
K
Keen
Posts: 663
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 6:27 pm I see no reason to believe the archeologists who investigated the Chelmno grave sites are incompetent or lying, therefore mass graves are indicated.
"Indicated"! :lol:

:lol: Mass graves are indicated at Chelmno! :lol:

Bombsaway,

17 - Of the 21 alleged Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question - the one that you can conclusively prove currently contains the most human remains is number: _?_

https://www.bing.com/images/search?view ... at=0&car=1

https://www.bing.com/images/search?view ... at=0&car=1

bombsaway, the first map has a title that says (in part) "The location plan of probing excavations."

How is that any different than what the fraud Kola did at Belzec and Sobibor?

And you do remember what you said about the fraudulent "excavaton" at Belzec, don't you bombsaway? Just in case you forgot:
bombsaway:

As for how many died at Belzec, again that is unknown and we can't accurately extrapolate from Kola's study.

The study doesn't prove any specific number
If the evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then the claim is obviously false.
K
Keen
Posts: 663
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by Keen »

Something the retarded reality deniers AND the so-called "revisionists" just don't seem to grasp, is this:

If the evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then the claim is obviously false.

It is so simple. The "elephant in my basement" analogy is a perfect example. My not seeing an elephant in my basement is all the evidence I need to conclude, with 100% certainty, that there is no elephant in my basement.

Anyone who believes that one cannot be 100% certain that an elephant is or is not in their basement is a retard. Anyone who falls for the "you cannot be 100% certain of anything but math" lie is a retard.

The physical remains of 2.145 million jews at B, C, P, S & TII - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the story that they were murdered and bureid at those sites to be true. The fact that that physical evidence - DOES NOT EXIST - proves that the allegation is false.

The retarded cult members want people to believe (insist is more accurate) what they are told, not what they see (do not see is more accurate).

Bottom line is, "revisionists" really are their own worst enemies when it comes to debating the absurd false unsubstantiated allegations about B, C, P, S & TII. The debate would be over before it even starts if "revisionists" would just stop playing the jews games. The jews chortle whenever they get someone to fall into their sophistic traps or believe their gas lighting nonsense like "you cannot be 100% certain of anything."
If the evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then the claim is obviously false.
Post Reply