Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

[TlsMS93]

There is no testimony that qualifies the cremations in the Reinhardt camps as flammable liquids. In Treblinka, for example, no witness could refute Richard Glazar's testimony that wood was the necessary material. Flammable liquids are helpful, at best, for example, lighting a barbecue, but they don't sustain cremations, and it would be absurd for the Germans to divert such valuable resources to cremate bodies during a massive war.

Indeed, what the examiner said is nothing short of absurd. So who can guarantee that the ashes found are purely human, thus overestimating the findings?

[Callafangers]

The ratios are unknown, so I'm not sure. They aren't definitive that wood was the primary fuel either.

It isn't that the "ratios are unknown", it's that there are witnesses claiming a lumberjacking and massive wood-fired operation and absolutely zero people or documents anywhere saying there were liquid fuels used at all.

And yet you believe thousands of tankers rolled in, unnoticed.

Kola's study implies thousands of meters

eg for one grave alone "The volume of crematory part is about 250 meters"

We were talking about the 1945 examiner, not Kola.

[bombsaway]

There is no testimony that qualifies the cremations in the Reinhardt camps as flammable liquids. In Treblinka, for example, no witness could refute Richard Glazar's testimony that wood was the necessary material. Flammable liquids are helpful, at best, for example, lighting a barbecue, but they don't sustain cremations, and it would be absurd for the Germans to divert such valuable resources to cremate bodies during a massive war.

Indeed, what the examiner said is nothing short of absurd. So who can guarantee that the ashes found are purely human, thus overestimating the findings?

He found hair and bones which would be identifiable as human if he had anatomical expertise. Are you saying the ash was animal based?

[Stubble]

Can we get back to 'where is the latrine' guys?

We have the 'did the Germans have an unlimited fuel hack' thread. This one is about, hey, is a hole ever, just a hole? Or, is it always a 'huge mass grave'?

[bombsaway]

Can we get back to 'where is the latrine' guys?

We have the 'did the Germans have an unlimited fuel hack' thread. This one is about, hey, is a hole ever, just a hole? Or, is it always a 'huge mass grave'?

A hole is not merely a hole if there are human remains in it. This is stupid.

[Stubble]

A hole is not a huge mass grave just because there are ashes and hair in it, this is stupid.

Where is the damn latrine Bombsaway.

The dry storage cellar?

Th refuse pit?

[bombsaway]

A hole is not a huge mass grave just because there are ashes and hair in it, this is stupid.

Where is the damn latrine Bombsaway.

The dry storage cellar?

Th refuse pit?

It's a grave you could say, calling it a "mass grave" is using a subjective qualifier. How would you judge what a mass grave was, when looking at a grave containing crematory ashes, assuming you had the resources allotted to Kola.

[Stubble]

Bombsaway, how do you even know if the ashes he found are cremains, or if any bone fragments he recovered are human?

You, don't.

For all we know, there are busted eyeglasses, non repairable shoes, hair, and ashes from burned suitcases in there...

[bombsaway]

Bombsaway, how do you even know if the ashes he found are cremains, or if any bone fragments he recovered are human?

You, don't.

For all we know, there are busted eyeglasses, non repairable shoes, hair, and ashes from burned suitcases in there...

The examiner said they were of human origin. Kola calls them body ashes. So I guess your argument hinges on them being liars or incompetent.

[Stubble]

Huh?

No.

Now, back to the point, where is the latrine at Belzec?