Archie's best case for Holocaust revision, continued;
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=443
An extermination program on the scale of millions cannot hinge on the presentation of a relatively tiny collection of stray documents.
It can when much of it was conducted in secret, there was a mass destruction of evidence and you want to pretend there is only a "tiny" collection. When documents are presented here, it instantly results in a complaint about "document dumps". So-called revisionists just do not understand that something which ran for years, across multiple countries, would not have a "smoking gun" document that proves everything.
The documents that aren't there. Given the scale of the extermination program that is alleged and the fact that the Allies conquered Germany and captured a huge volume of documents, we should expect to find considerable documentary evidence for such a program.
Genuine historical revision, produces an evidence chronology of events, that differs from the existing version. Why do so-called revisionists not wonder why, given the scale of the task, there is zero documentary evidence of the Nazis still keeping millions of Jews alive in camps and ghettos in 1944-5?
The gas chambers present an additional documentary problem because once Hitler had decided to exterminate millions of Jews, you would think there would be discussion over the technical and logistical issues involved in such a large scale mass murder project. Because there was no organization on these points, the story is that the technical means were largely improvised with all the details being left to, for example, Rudolf Hoess, the camp commandant of Auschwitz, to work out on the fly.
That is exactly how it worked. The plan was to rid Nazi occupied Europe of Jews. It was up to local governors, how that was done. One of the options, was to send Jews to death camps, located in Poland, which resulted in transports from ghettos and transit camps from all over Europe. Once the plan was set, it was up to Nazis lower down the chain, to organise it, officers such as Eichmann. The AR camps, Chelmno and use of the Birkenau Kremas, for mass gassings, was only ever going to be temporary. So long as the gas chambers worked, it did not matter if they were state of technology, as they would not exist after the Jews had gone. There is a lot of detail about how the gas chambers at Birkenau worked, which so-called revisionists chose to not believe. As if that somehow evidence to prove there were no gas chambers!
Today, it is quite clear how "the hoax" is maintained. In many countries, it is illegal to disbelieve it which is a very clear and explicit enforcement mechanism.
We are supposed to believe that no one has ever whistle blown and publicised evidence of the mass killings being hoaxed, which the internet has made far easier. It is certainly in the interests of the Arab nations, to blow the Holocaust, as a majopr coup over Israel. Somehow, they have not done that.
It is important to note that this would not require much if any elaborate planning. There is no reason to assume for example that the Zionists, the Americans, the British, and the Soviets all got together during the war to work this out.
Note the admission this is an assumption. Archie has no evidence of such cooperation, and he ignores the role of the Nazis. It needed their cooperation as well. They had to pretend they had murdered millions of Jews. Archie also misses out the role of Poland, as even he cannot bring himself to believe that the Poles, from which the vast majority of intelligence on the mass killings came, could hoax the world. Then there is the issue of after the war, when the Soviets and the West became enemies, with no more cooperation.
But where did the Jews go?
Archie cannot answer that question. He makes vague comments about population figures, but he misses out the key year of 1944. According to the historians, the majority of murders had happened by then, with only Hungary and France left with sizeable Jewish populations. If Jews from Estonia to Greece, to Italy to Norway, who had been identified and arrested and sent to ghettos and camps, had not been murdered in their millions, then by 1944, there would be millions in the camps and ghettos. Instead of that, by August 1944, the last ghetto at Lodz had closed and Auschwitz, the largest camp, had a smaller population than it had in 1943.
This is an attempt to shift the burden of proof over to revisionists who are expected to provide a complete accounting of Jewish population movements in order to prove that the Jews survived.
That is an excuse to dodge the burden of proof so-called revisionists have, when they claim millions were not killed. It is blindingly obvious, that to prove someone was not killed, you provide proof of life. No one asks so-called revisionists to provide proof of life for every Jew who had been arrested by 1944. Millions still alive in 1944 would leave a lot of evidence, and there is none. When the camps were liberated, only a few hundred thousand Jews were found alive.
The vast majority of the evidence of dropping populations, comes from the Nazis. It is strong circumstantial evidence, that so-called revisionsits cannot cope with.
