Comments on other threads.

A containment zone for disruptive posters
K
Keen
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Keen »

Nesserto:
First, describe what the severe, unbiased, robust scientific tests to establish what, if anything is buried at TII, are. The answer is excavations and geophysical surveys. Those tests apply whether one approaches the issue believing or disbelieving that hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried there, or not. I doubt that you can come up with any other form of testing to establish what, or if people were buried there, so those are the tests to falsify any claim made about burials or a lack thereof.

If such archaeological and geophysical surveys find large areas of buried remains and a series of burial pits, then a claim there were no mass burials has been falsified. If those surveys find large areas of undisturbed ground and no burial pits, then a claim of mass burials has been falsified.

The issue is, as I said in the OP, where "results are disputed". You dispute the findings by those who have surveyed TII, who are convinced they have found enough disturbed ground and human remains to prove the claim hundreds of thousands were buried there. What you cannot do, is falsify those results, by producing results that prove large areas of undisturbed ground and no burial pits.

In effect, archaeologists do a better job of falsifying your claim of no mass burials, than you do of falsifying their claim of mass burials. They produce evidence you dispute, you produce no evidence. The archaeologists are also supported by evidence from eyewitnesses, documents and circumstances around the operation of TII as a camp.

...

The Nazis were not trying to magically disappear the corpses and the graves.

All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps.

Mass graves are proven. By all normal standards of evidencing, they are proven.

I can point to them in the ground.

...

Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits, G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54 and that they exist. But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains.

The ease in which one can utterly destroy roberto's low IQ drivel above is amazing:

roberto, is it - True. - or - False. - that the USHMM alleges that 925,000 jews were murdered at Treblinka II?

roberto, did the "archaeoligist" CSC identify three shallow pits at Treblinka II that didn't contain so mucha as an iota of human remains as "posible grave sites" - Yes. - or - No. - ??

roberto, how many of the 16 alleged 'huge mass graves" of Treblinka II have been archaeologically proven to contain the remains of at least two people?

roberto, the remains of how many jews were discovered in Treblinka II's "huge mass memorial grave"

Image

??

Image
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Keen »

Monsieur Sceptique:
But forgive me for saying so, I don't think the revisionists here deny that there may have been burials.
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=21706#p21706
Forgive me Monsieur, but one cannot deny something that doesn't exist or that has never been proven to be true.

But yes, most "revisionists," just like the mentally ill exterminationist cult members, do cling to their delusional, unsubstantiated beleif that there really are "huge mass graves" within the boundaries of the "pure extermination centers."

(See here: https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=20014#p20014 - for example.)

It's sad really. Kind of like a retarded 4th grader clinging to a belief in Santa. But here we are.

CSC quote from the same post:
Although without intrusive activity (which is not advocated here due to Halacha Law and the ethical issues involved in the disturbance of human remains) it is not possible to conclusively determine the nature of these pits, a strong case can be made for their function based on a comparison with witness plans and accounts, and with similar features at other sites.
They only started using this lame and discredited excuse after their excavations kept turning up "huge mass graves" like this:

Image

And note that "not advocated" does not mean not allowed.

This was allowed for example:
Image

Sobibor "huge mass grave" number 7
That ladies and genlemen, is what the remains of tens of thousands of magically disappearing jews looks like. (When it's not in liquid form.)
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Post Reply