Why does SanityCheck evade the Physical Evidence Question?

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
Nazgul
Posts: 674
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 6:41 am
Location: Yasenevo Russia

Re: Why does SanityCheck evade the Physical Evidence Question?

Post by Nazgul »

Dr. Terry,

Thank you for your detailed overview of the Treblinka transports. I would like to highlight several points from the Fahrplananordnung (FPLO) documents and related research:

Scheduled Stops En Route: Many trains made planned stops at Jewish labor camps or railway junctions, typically lasting around an hour. These stops involved unloading or temporary placement of deportees before the final arrival at Treblinka.

Deaths During Transit: While some deportees undoubtedly died en route, the FPLO records do not specify the ethnicity or precise cause of death. Consequently, assuming that all DOA cases were Jewish or that all deaths occurred only upon arrival at Treblinka is not supported by the documentation.

Local Burials: Investigations indicate a large number of Jewish cemeteries along transport routes. These suggest that some deportees who died in transit were buried locally, further challenging the idea that the majority of deaths occurred at the Treblinka upper camp.

Taken together, the FPLO documents and burial evidence demonstrate that transport logistics were more structured than a purely chaotic DOA scenario suggests. This does not deny deaths occurred, but it does indicate that arrivals at Treblinka were not uniformly “mostly dead on arrival,” and some deportees were alive during intermediate stops.

If useful, I can provide the FPLO references for review, which give clear documentation of stops, timing, and handling procedures along these transport routes.

Here is a link with the information FPLO 587
SPQR
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 3044
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am
Location: 5th Circle of Hell

Re: Why does SanityCheck evade the Physical Evidence Question?

Post by Stubble »

Again you are moving the mass graves out of the bounds of the extermination area of Treblinka, you can't do that. Your communist propagandist turned Treblinka survivor and your Warsaw circus writers group constrain the mass graves to where they are not. Furthermore, my study of the satellite LIDAR of the area does not indicate mass graves in the fields. I don't see a vegetation change on satellite photos either. Disturbances are not indicated. Results are null.

They still aren't 'murdered at Treblinka'. Something else happened.
Last edited by Stubble on Thu Feb 12, 2026 2:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
User avatar
Nazgul
Posts: 674
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 6:41 am
Location: Yasenevo Russia

Re: Why does SanityCheck evade the Physical Evidence Question?

Post by Nazgul »

Stubble wrote: Thu Feb 12, 2026 2:26 am They still aren't 'murdered at Treblinka'. Something else happened.
This is because if you read my post above most never arrived. At Treblinka there were an arbeitslager and two judenlagers. The transports stopped at locations of Jewish Labour camps or railways junctions for about an hour according to train schedule documents.
SPQR
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 3044
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am
Location: 5th Circle of Hell

Re: Why does SanityCheck evade the Physical Evidence Question?

Post by Stubble »

I should have quote posted Dr Terry. I was referring to his synopsis of why the mass graves don't comport with the number. Regardless, the population of Seattle wasn't murdered at Treblinka II, dug up, cremated and then shot into the stratosphere.

I guess the same still applies to you as well Mr Wraith, however, your claim here is very far from the orthodox claim. You see, for 80 years everyone has been led to believe that on the order of 800,000 people were buried, dug up and cremated at Treblinka II. This is the orthodox narrative. It is also demonstrably false. Hence now the wriggling and worming the bodies into simply being 'some place else'.

The irony here is of course rich. You see, I'm told this isn't how history is done as I literally watch the sausage being made. The outcome is predetermined, evidence be damned. I saw the start of these steps Nick is strolling down over in the Sobibor thread. There he cited the Hoffle telegram as proof we knew people went to Sobibor. Now, well, we don't know from Hoffle, because, escapes happened and so people were shot on the way you see. Then there are all the other Holocaust History canards. I'm surprised he didn't say that the '80%' who 'arrived dead from asphyxiation' were murdered with chlorinated lime thrown in the floor of the train car. That, is the claim, isn't it Nick? That they asphyxiated on chlorine gas generated from chlorinated lime on the floor?

I will say Mr Wraith, I'm surprised to see your version of the events as well. Don't get me wrong, I absolutely believe 14f14 was employed at these camps, which isn't so different. I can even see some 14f13. Where you lose me is millions of dead jews. You and I have been over the population miracle, we have been over the population revisions post war. We have talked about the efforts by the German Authorities to preserve lives. Now, well, you are talking about piles of dead jews littering the train tracks and covering the front porch at Treblinka. Color me surprised.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Post Reply