Critiquing evidence is not a fallacy.

A containment zone for disruptive posters
K
Keen
Posts: 1218
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Critiquing evidence is not a fallacy.

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Thu Feb 12, 2026 7:14 am original mass graves have been identified as having little cremated remains in them.
Image

There's the mentally ill HC cult member again spewing her "magically disappearing jew" theory again.

These are the "original" - "huge mass graves" of Treblinka, alleged to contain 6.753 million pounds of human remains in various form, along with over 29 million teeth:

Image

Not one has ever proven to exist.

NOT ONE.

Unless you count this:

Image

Nor have any other "huge mass graves" ever been proven to exist within the boundy of the camp.
Nessie,

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Non-nefarious diggings for such things as garbage pits, cellars, wells, latrines, septic pits, etc. - were dug at Treblinka II - ??

Nesserto's answer:

True
Nessie,

Of the 15 alleged Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question - the one that you can conclusively prove currently contains the most human remains is number: _?_.

Nessie's answer:
I don't know.
Nesserto:

Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits and that they exist. But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains.
CSC:

Without intrusive activity it is not possible to conclusively determine the nature of these pits.
No graves, mass or otherwise, have ever been proven to eixist within the boundary of Treblinka II that contained cremated remains.

NOT ONE.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Post Reply