Why does SanityCheck evade the Physical Evidence Question?

[Stubble]

And, you know, GPR/LIDAR, limited excavations and the 13 Apostles.

How about Sobibor then, where did they bury a quarter of a million people? The graves that have human remains have mostly bodies, buried in a manner that appears consistent with SOP. there are some scattered cremains, but nothing close to the claim. Same with grave space. Fangers has an excellent breakdown in his thread.

Maybe Belzec is different?

I know you've already seen this link, I don't know if you have listened to it, but, it bears repeating and it has a catchy hook;

https://odysee.com/@UncleSvenAgain:3/BelzecCase:9

it never ends with you. It's a loop de loop of inanity. You brought up maps, now we're moving on. I've addressed these before, but we'll just end up talking about maps again soon enough.

Dude, you unironically said they buried the dead outside the wire in the trees and shit. You actually said that, with a straight face.

This is what the camp would have to look like;



It doesn't.

[HansHill]

The other is the Leuchter-Rudolf tests of the crematoria for cyanide traces. Both found such traces, but not in the form of iron cyanides. The 'coup' as it was hailed back in the 1980s/1990s wasn't found convincing. Leuchter and Rudolf were judged to have failed to have proven this would be a genuinely falsifying test, i.e. that the conditions in homicidal gassings would have necessarily led to the formation of iron cyanide, and that we should expect non-iron cyanides to have persisted in ruins exposed to the elements for 40+ years or which were used only sporadically. (Rudolf only sampled Krema II of the five crematoria, so his actual results were remarkably limited, btw.)

Note how their results were explained with auxiliary hypotheses which sought to reconstruct the circumstances of homicidal gassings (with ventilation in the significant cases) compared with prolonged delousing fumigation gassings, and thus the test failed.

Can you explain the part highlighted in bold please? Or is this mistaken?

For those paying attention in this thread, this is a legitimate Revisionist critique of the Markiewicz methodology. I have raised this point three times now and i dont think Dr Terry is reading or responding to my points so i have asked him here to explain or address this here.

Perhaps a mod can review and draw it to Dr Teery’s attention on the third (fourth?) time of asking.

[Stubble]

.

Oops

[bombsaway]

Dude, you unironically said they buried the dead outside the wire in the trees and shit. You actually said that, with a straight face.

No. They buried them and then over the next 70 years trees grew in that area.

[Callafangers]

The other is the Leuchter-Rudolf tests of the crematoria for cyanide traces. Both found such traces, but not in the form of iron cyanides. The 'coup' as it was hailed back in the 1980s/1990s wasn't found convincing. Leuchter and Rudolf were judged to have failed to have proven this would be a genuinely falsifying test, i.e. that the conditions in homicidal gassings would have necessarily led to the formation of iron cyanide, and that we should expect non-iron cyanides to have persisted in ruins exposed to the elements for 40+ years or which were used only sporadically. (Rudolf only sampled Krema II of the five crematoria, so his actual results were remarkably limited, btw.)

Note how their results were explained with auxiliary hypotheses which sought to reconstruct the circumstances of homicidal gassings (with ventilation in the significant cases) compared with prolonged delousing fumigation gassings, and thus the test failed.

Can you explain the part highlighted in bold please? Or is this mistaken?

For those paying attention in this thread, this is a legitimate Revisionist critique of the Markiewicz methodology. I have raised this point three times now and i dont think Dr Terry is reading or responding to my points so i have asked him here to explain or address this here.

Perhaps a mod can review and draw it to Dr Teery’s attention on the third (fourth?) time of asking.

You know, in a roundabout way, his evasion of this physical evidence question is actually on-topic with the current thread.

[Stubble]

[...]

Replied in appropriate thread;
viewtopic.php?p=21996#p21996

[Callafangers]

On physical evidence:

I'll be honest with you. I don't even care enough to have read any of the chemistry stuff in this debate.

Fifty-six (56) Olympic sized swimming pools chock-filled with Jews at Treblinka! Oh wait, nevermind...

‍

Lol.

[Stubble]

And to think, Auschwitz only had the one pool...

I think it bears remarking that no one wants to throw a single witness out of the Auschwitz pool, even if he does look like jaws when he back strokes, but, folks seem almost eager to absolutely drive a bus over the Treblinka witnesses without hesitation. Well, except for the part where they saw a homicidal gas chamber and a 30 foot flaming pit behind a fake hospital into which jews were thrown. Those we keep, we just lose the mass graves part, since, those don't exist. So, you know, people just died in transit and were buried where they died like in Oregon Trail, only, they didn't die of dysentery, they were suffocated in a chlorinated lime cattle car of death...

Why not 88% of the transports instead of just a measly 80%?

o/