Stubble wrote: ↑Sat Feb 14, 2026 6:03 pm
You misspelled 'soil disturbance' as 'mass grave'.
Did an artillery shell ever fall there?
Regardless, it goes against your eyewitnesses to imply that the grave space is anywhere but inside the extermination area (so called) or behind the lazeret.
Whatever. Your contention is (and I get it you are trying to distract from this - probably subconsciously) that "soil disturbances" like the ones you quoted CSC as finding don't exist in the forested areas. I'm showing you why this is stupid. At best you can say there is a question here, that possibly they don't. This is the story of revisionism tbh.
Witnesses may not tell the entire story. If you have a statement saying that definitively no graves were dug outside the boundary that's actual evidence for your position, even if still not bulletproof.
You throw your witnesses in the garbage and assume any disturbed soil is a huge mass grave regardless of where it is located.
That soil disturbance between the security wires may as well be in Florida, given that absolutely none of your whiteness ever say anything about going in to what is called 'the dead zone', because it is where you kill people for going, to retrieve bodies to cremate them in the extermination area on 'corps roasters', nor do they talk about driving to Epcot Center to retrieve corpses to burn.
You are the one being super fucking slimy here, and to point at me for looking at this rationally and to try to say that I'm the one being unreasonable and making huge assumptions when that is exactly what you are doing is why our discourse has become so severely strained at this point.
If that disturbance in the dead zone were inside the wire, I would grant it out of hand and just add it to the surface area tally of reasonably claimed grave space.
It is not, and it never will be, and there are not piles of dead jews under the fucking rocks and trees between Treblinka and Cairo either.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
You are making strong assumptions (that it couldn't have possibly happened) about burial outside the wire.
And also that the areas now forested fell outside the wire.
I don't know if the witness testimony is explicit about this, I haven't read all of it, and all of it isn't even available in english, but assuming that is so, sure there are gaps in the historical record, that doesn't mean something is impossible.
