Comments on other threads.

A containment zone for disruptive posters
Online
K
Keen
Posts: 1277
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Keen »

Nazgul wrote: Fri Feb 27, 2026 3:39 pm A New Framework for Inquiry: Moving Beyond the "Murder Case" Binary
Well, I take back what I said earlier as I see that Nazgul continues to attempt to turn a 2+2 issue into something much more complicated than it actually is.
Nazgul wrote: Fri Feb 27, 2026 3:39 pm 1. Shifting the Paradigm: From "Murder" to "Industrial Cull"
So Nazgul wants to change "pure extermination center" to "industrial cull center."

Image
Nazgul wrote: Fri Feb 27, 2026 3:39 pm Rather than repeating a six-year "challenge" based on physical anomalies
What a retard.

No wonder Nazgul is so afraid to answer questions.
Nazgul wrote: Fri Feb 27, 2026 3:39 pm I invite a look at the interconnected lattice of logistics (Fplo 587), chemistry (TNT/picric acid), and administrative law (PS-630). The views on these technical threads suggest there is a hunger for this level of forensic detail. We are unpuzzling a tragedy that was legally shielded by Hitler's own signature—a system that treated human beings as livestock to be "culled" when the Reich’s own criminal negligence rendered them unproductive.
Image

Nazgul wants "forensic detail" yet he cravenly refuses to answer simple questions about what he alleges.

Nazgul,

11 - List all of the Belzec graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

12 - List all of the Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

13 - List all of the Ponary graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

14 - List all of the Sobibor graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

15 - List all of the Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Online
K
Keen
Posts: 1277
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Fri Feb 27, 2026 3:49 pm I made it clear that the eyewitnesses are corroborated by other evidence and it that corroboration which proves the vast majority did not leave.
You have also made it clear what you allege about the fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves:"
The Nazis were not trying to magically disappear the corpses and the graves.

All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps.

Mass graves are proven. By all normal standards of evidencing, they are proven.

I can point to them in the ground.
Well then roberta:
11 - List all of the Belzec graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

12 - List all of the Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

13 - List all of the Ponary graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

14 - List all of the Sobibor graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

15 - List all of the Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.
What are you waiting for roberta?

What are you so afraid of?
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3720
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Nessie »

Stubble;

viewtopic.php?p=22692#p22692
Another thing I'm not going to just let slide is the absolute miscarriage of my education on the subject by the main stream. I was shown the victims of the Nordhausen Bombing Raid in a textbook as 'proof of the nazi extermination of 6,000,000 jews and 5,000,000 others'. I was shown film of the showers at Majdanek (has anybody ever claimed anybody was gassed in the shower room at Majdanek Nick) as 'proof of the nazi extermination of 6,000,000 jews and 5,000,000 others'. I was shown film of bodies being bulldozed into mass graves a Bergen Belsen (Nick, are you going to claim that the Germans 'systematically exterminated' the internees at Bergen Belsen? ) as 'proof of the nazi plan to exterminate 6,000,000 jews and 5,000,000 others'.
I am going to say that is a misrepresentation of the evidence Stubble was provided, based on how often he misrepresents the evidence I have provided him.

He may well have been shown victims of a bombing raid and the corpses being bulldozed into mass graves at Bergen-Belsen, as evidence of what happened during the Holocaust, with Jews used as forced labourers and being left by SS camp staff to starve to death at the end of the war. I doubt it was actually presented as proof of the plan to exterminate millions of Jews. Stubble so often misrepresents and confuses himself over the evidence, I think he did not understand the evidence he was provided. His education was not a "miscarriage", he just did not understand his teacher.

An example of his misrepresentation;
I must mention some sense of irony in the 'wooden doors were used for the pyres' bit as it would appear not just the holocaust at Auschwitz is dependent on wooden doors, but now Aktion 1005vas well
No one anywhere, has suggested the wooden gas chamber doors were used for the pyres. That is a made up, strawman, misrepresentation.
Anecdotal, often a single prisoner will kick out a steel door. This is done by putting ones back against it and pounding ones heel into it at about mid calf level on the door. Steel doors in a steel frame. 1 guy. 1.
I am calling that out as made up. To claim it is "often" would mean it would not need to be anecdotal, he should be able to easily provide multiple examples. The reinforced delousing chamber doors at A-B and the steel doors at the AR camps were solid enough that despite reported prisoner attempts to break through and damage inflicted, they were soon over come by the HCN and none succeeded in breaking out. A document recorded an order for 210 anchors for gas tight doors, showing the reinforcement work undertaken. Whilst Stubble is correct about the method he describes as the best to try and force open a door, it will only work on weaker doors, with stronger people. A cell door would resist a prisoner for long enough that if they were being gassed, they could not break it down.
If you don't make an effort to correct the record and to STOP the mistelling of history, you can look forward to MANY others like me. I stand where I stand strictly because I was lied to from the 4th grade to the 12th grade. Year after year, lie after lie, presented to me by people I trusted and did not question.
The mis-telling of history, is from the Holocaust denier/revisionists, not the historians. Stubble was not being lied to, he has fallen down a conspiracy theorist rabbit hole of his own making, whereby he distorts what he has been told and shown.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3720
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Nessie »

The Actual Jewish Death Toll thread;

viewtopic.php?t=751

Fireoffice states;
I've seen other estimates, like 271k, based on the Red Cross, which I don't believe are correct at all. The Red Cross number is from the International Tracing Service (ITS). The problem is that this number is not complete by any means and doesn't purport to be. Deaths from the Reinhard camps and Einsatzgruppen are not included.
That death toll is the one most commonly used by denier on X. It is for only 13 of the camps and none of the ghettos and no one thinks that if they were included, deaths at the rate the IRC recorded for each camp, would produce a total of way over 6 million. At least the standard of research here is marginally better than found on X.

Stubble suggests;
Around 2,300,000 'missing' and 602,511 missing presumed dead under the stewardship of 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔗𝔥𝔦𝔯𝔡 ℜ𝔢𝔦𝔠𝔥
That is contradicted by the Korherr Report,

http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org ... rherr.html

"These figures indicate that the Jewish population of Europe has already been reduced by 4 million. On the European continent (after Russia with c. 4 million) only Hungary (750,000, Rumania (302,000) and possibly France have large Jewish populations."

That means at least 4 million Jews need to be found alive by revisionists at the start of 1943, if they were not killed.

Archie suggests;
If, based on our bottom-up estimates, we posit an overall number of around 600,000 (10x exaggeration ratio), we should not overlook the difficulty of reconciling this to top-down figures.... But we do need to ask whether it is reasonable to think 3M or more would have fallen through the definitional cracks.
Revisionists happily fail to find c5 million Jews they claim were not gassed or shot, and they should ask if that is reasonable.
Online
K
Keen
Posts: 1277
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 11:59 am That means at least 4 million Jews need to be found alive by revisionists at the start of 1943, if they were not killed.
Logical fallacy from the mentally ill HC cult member roberta.

Nobody says that the 2.143 million jews who are fraudulently alleged to have been murdered in Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II, IF they existed, may not have died elsewhere between 1943 and the end of the war or after the war.

It has been proven that the alleged 2.15 million jews who are fraudulently alleged to have been murdered at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II were not murdered at those camps. Therefore, it has been proven that the orthodox holohoax story is a big-lie.
If the physical evidence for an alleged crime that - HAS TO EXIST - for the crime to have actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged crime obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.

Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.

http://thisisaboutscience.com/
This is a murder case, not a missing persons case.

The mentally ill holohoaxers (and even a lot of "revisionists") attempt to change this from a murder case to a missing persons case is a tacit admission that they failed to prove their alleged murder case and are trying to shift the burden of proof.

2.145 million alleged murders and this is the best "evidence" that the holohoaxers have to "prove" their case:

Image

It's also the best "evidence" that "revsisionists" have for their alleged "tens of thousands" of deaths at those 5 camps.
Last edited by Keen on Mon Mar 02, 2026 1:30 pm, edited 5 times in total.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Online
K
Keen
Posts: 1277
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Keen »

Nesserto wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 11:59 am Revisionists happily fail to find c5 million Jews they claim were not gassed or shot, and they should ask if that is reasonable.
When they lowered the death toll at Auschwitz from 4 million to 1.5 million, where did they "find" the "missing" 2.5 million people?

Image



Image

Image
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Online
K
Keen
Posts: 1277
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 7:25 am Stubble was not being lied to, he has fallen down a conspiracy theorist rabbit hole of his own making, whereby he distorts what he has been told and shown.
roberta, this is what you, Stubble and pretty much everyone participating on this forum were "told and shown" when we were young:



roberta,

The "ashes" of how many jews can you prove actually exist in this "ash pond"?

And do you remember what you used to believe about the Sobibor "ash mound"?
The aspect of the substance that the mound consists of, which has a light gray coloration different from the light-brown color of the soil at Sobibor (see photos mentioned in answer B.3 above) suggests the accuracy of captions describing this mound as a mound consisting of or containing human ashes...

The conclusion that the mound in question is comprised of human ash is thus the conclusion that is borne out by all known evidence and belied by none. It is also the conclusion towards which various sources of evidence independent of each other converge. This convergence of various sources of evidence independent of each other, alone or together with the absence of any evidence to the contrary, is proof that the mound in question is comprised of human ash.

The human ashes that the mound at Sobibor is comprised of may have been dug out of one of more of the pits discovered by Prof. Kola in 2001. They were probably brought to the surface by postwar robbery digging, which would mean it is impossible to determine which of the grave pits contained these specific ashes... because it clearly shows what my assumption regarding the origin of the ashes that make up the Sobibor ash mound was: human ashes brought to the surface by postwar robbery digging were collected by the people in charge of the Sobibor memorial site and put together into this ash mound.

viewtopic.php?p=18813#p18813
You're posts "clearly show" that you are mentall ill roberto.

No wonder you are so afraid to post using your real name.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 3192
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am
Location: 5th Circle of Hell

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Stubble »

Spoiler
Nessie wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 11:59 am The Actual Jewish Death Toll thread;

viewtopic.php?t=751

Fireoffice states;
I've seen other estimates, like 271k, based on the Red Cross, which I don't believe are correct at all. The Red Cross number is from the International Tracing Service (ITS). The problem is that this number is not complete by any means and doesn't purport to be. Deaths from the Reinhard camps and Einsatzgruppen are not included.
That death toll is the one most commonly used by denier on X. It is for only 13 of the camps and none of the ghettos and no one thinks that if they were included, deaths at the rate the IRC recorded for each camp, would produce a total of way over 6 million. At least the standard of research here is marginally better than found on X.

Stubble suggests;
Around 2,300,000 'missing' and 602,511 missing presumed dead under the stewardship of 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔗𝔥𝔦𝔯𝔡 ℜ𝔢𝔦𝔠𝔥
That is contradicted by the Korherr Report,

http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org ... rherr.html

"These figures indicate that the Jewish population of Europe has already been reduced by 4 million. On the European continent (after Russia with c. 4 million) only Hungary (750,000, Rumania (302,000) and possibly France have large Jewish populations."

That means at least 4 million Jews need to be found alive by revisionists at the start of 1943, if they were not killed.

Archie suggests;
If, based on our bottom-up estimates, we posit an overall number of around 600,000 (10x exaggeration ratio), we should not overlook the difficulty of reconciling this to top-down figures.... But we do need to ask whether it is reasonable to think 3M or more would have fallen through the definitional cracks.
Revisionists happily fail to find c5 million Jews they claim were not gassed or shot, and they should ask if that is reasonable.
For posterity, a thread on 'The Korherr Report'.

https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=756

See, Nessie believes my estimates don't align with The Korherr Report because he thinks 'tranported' actually means 'murdered'. Problem is, it doesn't...
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3720
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Nessie »

Stubble wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 4:05 pm
Spoiler
Nessie wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 11:59 am The Actual Jewish Death Toll thread;

viewtopic.php?t=751

Fireoffice states;
I've seen other estimates, like 271k, based on the Red Cross, which I don't believe are correct at all. The Red Cross number is from the International Tracing Service (ITS). The problem is that this number is not complete by any means and doesn't purport to be. Deaths from the Reinhard camps and Einsatzgruppen are not included.
That death toll is the one most commonly used by denier on X. It is for only 13 of the camps and none of the ghettos and no one thinks that if they were included, deaths at the rate the IRC recorded for each camp, would produce a total of way over 6 million. At least the standard of research here is marginally better than found on X.

Stubble suggests;
Around 2,300,000 'missing' and 602,511 missing presumed dead under the stewardship of 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔗𝔥𝔦𝔯𝔡 ℜ𝔢𝔦𝔠𝔥
That is contradicted by the Korherr Report,

http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org ... rherr.html

"These figures indicate that the Jewish population of Europe has already been reduced by 4 million. On the European continent (after Russia with c. 4 million) only Hungary (750,000, Rumania (302,000) and possibly France have large Jewish populations."

That means at least 4 million Jews need to be found alive by revisionists at the start of 1943, if they were not killed.

Archie suggests;
If, based on our bottom-up estimates, we posit an overall number of around 600,000 (10x exaggeration ratio), we should not overlook the difficulty of reconciling this to top-down figures.... But we do need to ask whether it is reasonable to think 3M or more would have fallen through the definitional cracks.
Revisionists happily fail to find c5 million Jews they claim were not gassed or shot, and they should ask if that is reasonable.
For posterity, a thread on 'The Korherr Report'.

https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=756

See, Nessie believes my estimates don't align with The Korherr Report because he thinks 'tranported' actually means 'murdered'. Problem is, it doesn't...
"Reduced by" is primarily caused by the mass murders. Is it reasonable that you cannot find millions of Jews still alive in 1944, when you claim there had been no mass murders 1939-44?
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3720
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Nessie »

Stubble argues that he cannot believe it is possible for the wooden doors used on the Auschwitz gas chambers, to keep people inside the chambers;

viewtopic.php?p=22718#p22718
Is this a joke? Look at that door lock assembly, look at it. Now, ask yourself if that would hold in 2,000 people being gassed with hydrogen cyanide gas...

I had always assumed these doors were made from timbers as well. Such is not the case. It is a thin wooden face covering a hollow door filled with dry concrete and insulation...

These timbers are only slightly thicker than paint sticks.

Why am I always asked to believe the absurd, only to find that what I already thought was absurd didn't even reach the level of absurdity expected? Why is that a consistent theme with the Holocaust Narrative? This happens time and time and time again.
They are made from 2 layers of wood and filled to hermetically seal them. They were reinforced delousing chamber doors, that once set into the frame, would be extremely difficult for people with bare feet being gassed to force open. They would not be able to coordinate putting the weight of 2000 of them onto the door.

Image

Maybe Stubble could explain why his thinking that the use of wooden doors is absurd, is of any evidential value. Would me thinking it is absurd the British would firebomb Dresden, be evidence to prove it did not happen?
Online
K
Keen
Posts: 1277
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:25 am Is it reasonable that you cannot find millions of Jews still alive in 1944, when you claim there had been no mass murders 1939-44?
Logical fallacy from the mentally ill HC cult member roberta.

Nobody says that the 2.145 million jews who are fraudulently alleged to have been murdered in Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II, IF they existed, may not have died elsewhere between 1943 and the end of the war or after the war.

It has been proven that the alleged 2.145 million jews who are fraudulently alleged to have been murdered at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II were not murdered at those camps.
If the physical evidence for an alleged crime that - HAS TO EXIST - for the crime to have actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged crime obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.

Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.

http://thisisaboutscience.com/
This is a murder case, not a missing persons case.

The mentally ill holohoaxers (and even a lot of "revisionists") attempt to change this from a murder case to a missing persons case is
an admission that they failed to prove even a fraction of their alleged murder case and are trying to shift the burden of proof.

2.145 million alleged jews allegedly buried in 100 alleged "huge mass graves" in 5 precisely known locations and this is the best "evidence" that the holohoaxers have to "prove" their case:

Image

Image
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 3192
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am
Location: 5th Circle of Hell

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Stubble »

Nessie wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:39 am Stubble argues that he cannot believe it is possible for the wooden doors used on the Auschwitz gas chambers, to keep people inside the chambers;

viewtopic.php?p=22718#p22718
Is this a joke? Look at that door lock assembly, look at it. Now, ask yourself if that would hold in 2,000 people being gassed with hydrogen cyanide gas...

I had always assumed these doors were made from timbers as well. Such is not the case. It is a thin wooden face covering a hollow door filled with dry concrete and insulation...

These timbers are only slightly thicker than paint sticks.

Why am I always asked to believe the absurd, only to find that what I already thought was absurd didn't even reach the level of absurdity expected? Why is that a consistent theme with the Holocaust Narrative? This happens time and time and time again.
They are made from 2 layers of wood and filled to hermetically seal them. They were reinforced delousing chamber doors, that once set into the frame, would be extremely difficult for people with bare feet being gassed to force open. They would not be able to coordinate putting the weight of 2000 of them onto the door.

Image

Maybe Stubble could explain why his thinking that the use of wooden doors is absurd, is of any evidential value. Would me thinking it is absurd the British would firebomb Dresden, be evidence to prove it did not happen?
Because I could kick the fucking thing in barefoot and almost unconscious. Holy fucking shit.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Online
K
Keen
Posts: 1277
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Keen »

Stubble wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2026 2:33 pm

I have no doubt, given time, either of us could find these jews. Problem is, you aren't, and haven't been, looking.
Nick Terry:
Incorrect. I've been looking for over a quarter of a century, one way or another.
Image

Who in their right mind would look for people in places other than the places that they allege they know exactly where they are?

Yet another tacit admission that the retard knows that the jews aren't really buried where he alleges them to be.

You get the HC cult retard of the day medal for that one nicky.

Image
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 3192
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am
Location: 5th Circle of Hell

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Stubble »

Holy shit Keen, sometimes I regret your contentment to be in here, this should be in the thread. I can't fucking believe I didn't plant that easy layup. Well done Sir. The language could be considered foul, but, the point is solid none the less.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3720
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Comments on other threads.

Post by Nessie »

Stubble wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 3:16 pm
Nessie wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:39 am ...

They are made from 2 layers of wood and filled to hermetically seal them. They were reinforced delousing chamber doors, that once set into the frame, would be extremely difficult for people with bare feet being gassed to force open. They would not be able to coordinate putting the weight of 2000 of them onto the door.

Image

Maybe Stubble could explain why his thinking that the use of wooden doors is absurd, is of any evidential value. Would me thinking it is absurd the British would firebomb Dresden, be evidence to prove it did not happen?
Because I could kick the fucking thing in barefoot and almost unconscious. Holy fucking shit.
No you could not. I was RAMIT trained in the police, using various items to force open doors. I have tried, without any equipment, with varying degrees of success, to force open doors. The technique you referred to, the donkey kick, is the most effective. That gas chamber door, because it is made of layers and the inner layer is absorbent, would, when set into a solid frame, be virtually impossible for someone to force open, especially with bare feet whilst being gassed. It would need the people inside the chamber to organise the strongest amongst them to try and force open the door and for others to make space for them around the door.

This is yet another instance of your opinion running away with you, as if it has evidential value. Just because you cannot image how something is possible, is not evidence.
Post Reply