SanityCheck wrote:Let me try to boil down the issues to a few numbered points, without the aid of AI:
Lol, just imagine you using AI. Your 5,000-word essays responding to simple questions would inflate further to 15,000 or beyond. We'd all be in trouble here.
In truth, I use AI only as a counter to situations where you evade with massive word salads, hence to refocus the conversation in areas you have deliberately avoided or evaded. It's going well so far.
SanityCheck wrote:1. Revisionism, including Mattogno, has yet to respond to/comment on a great deal of historical and archaeological work on the AR camps (and other Holocaust sites). Some of this work is due fairly soon, such as Caroline Sturdy Colls' Finding Treblinka.
Ah, so Mattogno has yet to respond to a work that isn't even published yet? Shame on him. Sturdy-Colls' prior efforts (2014-2020) already yielded economic debris and sparse remains -- corroborating revisionism's sparsity prediction while falsifying extermination-scale traces (no mega-graves/pyres matching Hoefle). Her "upcoming" book changes nothing.
SanityCheck wrote:2. A great deal more information is available on the deportation ends and circumstances of transports... Fully researching this will take time, so requests for quantification of what will still be estimates won't be replied to for the foreseeable future.
This has nothing to do with my challenges. You vaguely hint at Jews offboarding before AR camps (which means they were counted in Hoefle/Korherr but survived transit), yet digs yield null results for your needed scale. "Further research will take time" = it doesn't support you now.
SanityCheck wrote:3. The core revisionist argument that cremating a corpse on an open air pyre requires substantial quantities of wood (300 now 400kg of wood/corpse) is already refuted by documented cases of much lower fuel ratios for comparable incinerations of animal carcasses.
Flat-out false. The authoritative peer-reviewed study is Yermán et al. (2018): Experimental Study on the Fuel Requirements for the Thermal Degradation of Bodies by Means of Open-Pyre Cremation (
https://codoh.com/library/document/expe ... cremation/). Rudolf discusses it here (2024): Open-Air Pyre Cremations Revisited (
https://codoh.com/library/document/open ... revisited/). Aligns with Hindu pyres (~500-700kg/corpse, dry wood). Your "refutations" ignore this data.
SanityCheck wrote:4. The condition of the AR camp sites... found uncremated corpse layers in wax fat transformation at the bottom of many graves (10 of 33). Therefore human remains were buried at these camps and also cremated at them. The presence of unburned remains at these sites indicate also that cremation was less than total.
Nobody disputes some cremations/burials (ghetto/train disease corpses, sanitation/economic ops at remote sites). Quantity matters -- your narrative demands city-scale traces, but Lukaszewicz/Kola/Mazurek/Sturdy-Colls yield sparsity/economic debris. "Less than total" concedes the physical mismatch.
SanityCheck wrote:5. The records of the AR camps were destroyed... Eyewitness descriptions do not provide detailed quantities for fuel, either, and this is quite normal...
"Dog ate my homework." Zero evidence for unprecedented scale (280M+ kg wood at Treblinka alone). Contemporary reports? Hearsay. Normal for what -- your fantasy?
SanityCheck wrote:6. Therefore, any attempt to quantify is speculative...
Your entire position, then.
SanityCheck wrote:7. This leads to the chief problem... without having any direct evidence to back up and quantify their 'correction'.
Occam's razor: victors concealed demographics invalidating propaganda (feasible); physical traces (not). AR digs corroborate revisionism first -- this nullifies extermination-scale claims before "where 100% went" (transit/labor/disease fits).
SanityCheck wrote:8. The generalised 300-400kg/corpse claim... aren't even vaguely explained.
Aktion 1005 is Soviet hearsay (no explicit/contemporary documents, improbable logistics, zero unearthed graves at scale at German sites), so no surprise you rely on it so heavily. Your "networks" of this kind bloat unproven claims.
SanityCheck wrote:9. Revisionist claims continue to fail corroboration... Revisionism 'knows' only that this "didn't happen", but cannot clinch the case with evidence pointing to another historical reconstruction.
Physical aspects nullify extermination first. "Zapping" aligns with Soviet cover-up. You claim "mainstream knows cremation... where large numbers disappeared" -- yet earlier concede most weren't even there (en route/escapes). Which is it?
Still Unchallenged (Since OP -- Your Evasion Confirmed):
- FeCN/Prussian Blue (Birkenau): Rudolf modeling predicts stable FeCN like delousing chambers; Markiewicz unbound-HCN volatile (your concession).
- Birkenau Capacity/Maintenance: No refractory records/air-photo pyres for 1.1M.
- Overlapping Math: ~10-15% max reduction (lean ~40k kcal avail., 54% efficiency vs. 200-330k demand).
- Sobibor Graves: Mazurek empties Kola's "dense" 1/2/7; max ~2.7k-17k.
- AR Fuel Scale: Treblinka 280M+ kg unprecedented; no supply/smoke witnesses.
- Falsifiability: Monuments block digs (economic ops found, not mass graves).
Assignment: Quantify revised tolls/sites (Treblinka/Belzec wood/process/graves), or name post-Muehlenkamp scholar who has. Child skew (~12%, pre-factored)/"Z%" insufficient -- show calculations.
Since your evasion remains ongoing, your physical evidence position remains lost. Revisionism's sparsity is hereby corroborated; yours is falsified.
Again: your archaeology department involvement is shocking -- you evade precision while claiming expertise.
Tsk tsk.