bombsaway wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2026 5:35 pm
Lol are you arguing that the Germans couldn't figure out how to get tiny pellets to fall into a container? the container would be lower than where the pellets fell, and would fall further when slots were opened, relying on the mysterious force known as GRAVITY. the third column would just have to have sloped sides.
Why don't you explain it to us?
The better arguments I think you have against this
The "best" arguments will become known and hopefully discussed when you explain the device in both form and function.
The difference between orthodoxy and revisionism is the gaps are in comparison microscopic for orthodoxy - eg a mechanism used for killing is not described in full
Why are we pretending that understanding the alleged murder weapon used to kill hundreds of thousands of people is not of vital importance?
bombsaway wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2026 5:35 pm
Lol are you arguing that the Germans couldn't figure out how to get tiny pellets to fall into a container? the container would be lower than where the pellets fell, and would fall further when slots were opened, relying on the mysterious force known as GRAVITY. the third column would just have to have sloped sides.
Why don't you explain it to us?
The better arguments I think you have against this
The "best" arguments will become known and hopefully discussed when you explain the device in both form and function.
The difference between orthodoxy and revisionism is the gaps are in comparison microscopic for orthodoxy - eg a mechanism used for killing is not described in full
Why are we pretending that understanding the alleged murder weapon used to kill hundreds of thousands of people is not of vital importance?
I did explain it, what, you want to know how the slots may have been opened to let the granules fall into the container? You think I can't do that?
There's not enough information to allow a complete reconstruction of the mechanism in all its aspects. I think the system I'm describing is certainly possible though, it's something a clever middle schooler could probably figure out.
bombsaway wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2026 5:35 pm
Lol are you arguing that the Germans couldn't figure out how to get tiny pellets to fall into a container? the container would be lower than where the pellets fell, and would fall further when slots were opened, relying on the mysterious force known as GRAVITY. the third column would just have to have sloped sides.
Why don't you explain it to us?
The better arguments I think you have against this
The "best" arguments will become known and hopefully discussed when you explain the device in both form and function.
The difference between orthodoxy and revisionism is the gaps are in comparison microscopic for orthodoxy - eg a mechanism used for killing is not described in full
Why are we pretending that understanding the alleged murder weapon used to kill hundreds of thousands of people is not of vital importance?
I did explain it, what, you want to know how the slots may have been opened to let the granules fall into the container? You think I can't do that?
I'm a frequent poster on a Holocaust Revisionism board, you can bet your bottom shekel I want to know. So enlighten us - Who opened the slots? Were they operated via chain? Rod? Pulley? Gears? Did the same person close / release the slots? How? Via release pin? Reversing the gears? Raising a pulley? Was it all manual? Was it mechanized? Motorized? Did it consume fuel? Was it heavy? Did it require lubricant? Was it a one man job? Or 4-man job?
There's not enough information to allow a complete reconstruction of the mechanism in all its aspects. I think the system I'm describing is certainly possible though, it's something a clever middle schooler could probably figure out.
We're not talking about middle schoolers, we are talking about the Third Reich - what did the metalworking workshop, under orders from the Central Construction Office (in turn, I assume, under orders from Hoss?) figure out?
