Historians v revisionists, methodology.

A containment zone for disruptive posters
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3902
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Historians v revisionists, methodology.

Post by Nessie »

Hektor wrote: Tue Apr 21, 2026 7:21 pm
Keen wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 12:07 am
Nesserto wrote: Sat Apr 18, 2026 2:36 pm To prove the witnesses lied, requires evidence
Or, a lack of evidence that would have to be present at the alleged crime scene if the alleged "witness" was not lying.

If the physical evidence for an alleged crime that - HAS TO EXIST - for the crime to have

actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged crime obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.

Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.
Exactly, and the fact that expectable evidence isn't there or can't be shown is telling.
The evidence TII was a death camp, far exceeds the evidence it had a different function. Only a determined denier, who has lost grip on reality, will pretend that the corroborating evidence from multiple witnesses who describe mass graves, the aerial photo that shows disturbed ground and rectangular outlines and the site surveys that identified disturbed ground and pits in the areas of the camp that the witnesses said contained the mass graves, is not evidence to prove mass graves.
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
K
Keen
Posts: 1376
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Historians v revisionists, methodology.

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Wed Apr 22, 2026 6:27 am
Hektor wrote: Tue Apr 21, 2026 7:21 pm
Keen wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 12:07 am

Or, a lack of evidence that would have to be present at the alleged crime scene if the alleged "witness" was not lying.


Exactly, and the fact that expectable evidence isn't there or can't be shown is telling.
The evidence TII was a death camp, far exceeds the evidence it had a different function. Only a determined denier, who has lost grip on reality, will pretend that the corroborating evidence from multiple witnesses who describe mass graves, the aerial photo that shows disturbed ground and rectangular outlines and the site surveys that identified disturbed ground and pits in the areas of the camp that the witnesses said contained the mass graves, is not evidence to prove mass graves.
Additionally, and independent of any other Holocaust Archaeology Hoax Challenge, a - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves / cremation pits in question that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of - at least 2 people. (That is less than one tenth of one one thousandth of one percent of the alleged mass murder.)

Note: The 6 original fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” of Treblinka II that were alleged by “authoritative eyewitnesses” and allegedly - “PROVEN” - to exist in the early show trials - MODEL - MAP - (but never proven to exist), are also included in the above reward offer. (A photo of one of these 6 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” can be seen - HERE.)

http://thisisaboutscience.com/
What are you waiting for roberto?

What are you so afraid of?


PART FOUR:

5 - In total, how many single, disconnected human teeth have been tangibly discovered within the 15 [21] alleged Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question: __?__.

10 - List all of the Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove actually exist and currently contain at least an iota of human remains: __?__.

15 - List all of the Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

20 - List all of the Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 21 human beings: __?__.

25 - Of the 15 [21] alleged Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question - the one that you can conclusively prove currently contains the most human remains is number: __?__.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Post Reply