Why does Keen refuse to debate?

A containment zone for disruptive posters
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3948
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Why does Keen refuse to debate?

Post by Nessie »

A quick look at some of Keen's more recent posts and he is still refusing to conduct himself in a manner that would make a debate possible and worthwhile. Nothing has changed from when I wrote the OP in this thread.
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
K
Keen
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Why does Keen refuse to debate?

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Thu Apr 23, 2026 3:26 pm Nothing has changed from when I wrote the OP in this thread.
Meaning of course, that you are still a lying, cowardly POS who lacks the intelligence, courage, integrity and character to defend your unsubstantiated allegations.

Image

Why does nessie refuse to debate?

nesserto:

A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.

Nessie, how many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?

Nessie's answer:

12 - G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.

nesserto:
You doubt and deny the evidence I produce.

The evidence TII was a death camp, far exceeds the evidence it had a different function. Only a determined denier, who has lost grip on reality, will pretend that the corroborating evidence from multiple witnesses who describe mass graves, the aerial photo that shows disturbed ground and rectangular outlines and the site surveys that identified disturbed ground and pits in the areas of the camp that the witnesses said contained the mass graves, is not evidence to prove mass graves.

I am both a trained historian and police officer.

The Nazis were not trying to magically disappear the corpses and the graves.

All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps.

Mass graves are proven. By all normal standards of evidencing, they are proven.

Proof, from multiple sources of corroborating evidence, has been produced.

You ignore corroboration. You deny the gathered evidence.

Claiming that multiple pits found by geophysics in the same part of the camp that witnesses state the main mass graves were dug, is not corroborating evidence to prove mass graves, is denial of reality.

I can point to them in the ground.
nick terry:
Everyone making a claim has to substantiate it.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Why does Keen refuse to debate?

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:01 pm Keen is too scared to debate me
Image

Nesserto, is it - True. - or - False. - that the so-called "eyewitness" Jankiel Wiernik was given the opportunity to definitively prove that he was telling the truth about the "huge mass graves" that he alleged existed within the boundary of the Treblnka II camp - ??
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Post Reply