Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

A revisionist safe space
Post Reply
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1685
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Archie »

I was reading a Stephen King novel called Apt Pupil. It's about a boy and his neighbor who's this notorious Nazi fugitive living under an assumed name. The boy has a morbid fascination with concentration camp stories because he thinks they're "neat," and he finds out about the old man and wants him to tell him all his gruesome stories. It's an amusing read for a revisionist, and quite over the top (as you'd expect from a writer like King). You've got your gas coming out of the shower heads, human skin lampshades, Jewish soap, all the familiar stuff. Here's one passage talking about how prisoners would hide contraband.
One woman, he remembered, had had a small diamond, flawed, it turned out, really not valuable at all--but it had been in her family for six generations, passed from mother to eldest daughter (or so she said, but of course she was a Jew and all of them lied). She swallowed it before entering Patin [note: fictional concentration camp]. When it came out in her waste, she swallowed it again. She kept doing this, although eventually the diamond began to cut her insides and she bled. (Apt Pupil, Ch 9)
When I read this I of course immediately recognized it as the Zisblatt story, but curiously the King novel was published years before.

Zisblatt's story does not appear to have been public knowledge until the Spielberg documentary in 1998. Her memoir is even later, 2008. She had given a Shoah Foundation interview in 1995 (this was ultimately how she was selected for the documentary).

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/vha7832

I don't see anything before 1995. I did a quick NY Times search and it seems her public profile is basically limited to The Last Days, and really only revisionists have heard of her (mostly because of the Eric Hunt doc).

Apt Pupil was first published in 1982 in Different Seasons, a collection of four shorter novels/stories King had in his drawer. According to King in the afterword, Apt Pupil was written "in a two-week period following the completion of The Shining." The Shining was published in 1977, so that would probably mean 1976.

This all got me wondering if this story had always been "around" or if it's something King made up in 1976. If King is the earliest example of this story, then most likely Zisblat directly or indirectly got the story from Apt Pupil (that seems more plausible than her independently coming up with the same story as it's quite specific). There are lots of stories about people hiding valuables in bodily orifices, but I don't recall an earlier example of this specific story of swallowing diamonds, defecating them out, and re-swallowing them repeatedly.

I have to say I am a little disappointed with Zisblatt. Although she's a fraud, I thought she at least deserved some points for creativity! But it seems we can't even credit her with that.
Incredulity Enthusiast
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 3458
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am
Location: 5th Circle of Hell

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Stubble »

Per Zisblatt herself, the first time she talked about it was the shoah foundation interview. After 'the last days' she decided to write her book.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
W
Wetzelrad
Posts: 649
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:35 am

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Wetzelrad »

You're the first to uncover this connection. You continue to impress me with the things you discover.

1982 versus 1995. Is this plagiarism? Holocaust fiction spilling over into Holocaust non-fiction?

Someone should ask the Zisblatt family if Apt Pupil or Different Seasons appears in their library or if Irene was ever a fan of Stephen King.

Then again, swallowing diamonds is a trope of many stories related and unrelated to the Holocaust. Any of these could have been the spark of inspiration for her. I've never actually watched Schindler's List but apparently there is a scene in that movie about parents in the Krakow Ghetto feeding their children bread-wrapped diamonds. Being as Schindler's List was released in 1993, and Zisblatt said that seeing this was what spurred her to write her book, this may be a more likely origin for her diamond story.

Image

Where Spielberg got this story from is another question.
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1685
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Archie »

Stubble wrote: Tue Feb 03, 2026 3:43 pm Per Zisblatt herself, the first time she talked about it was the shoah foundation interview. After 'the last days' she decided to write her book.
It doesn't look like the Shoah Foundation interview is online currently, but this page on Carolyn Yeager's site has a quite a lot detail about it.
https://carolynyeager.net/book/export/html/250

According to Yeager, she only mentions swallowing the diamonds once in the 1995 interview. Yeager seems to think the story was embellished with subsequent retellings. Perhaps she realized she needed some explanation for what happened to the diamonds.

ST = Shoah
FD = Fifth Diamond
LD = Last Days
Swallowing her mother’s diamonds only once versus over and over again

(ST) When undergoing the initial disinfection process, she remembered the (unknown number of) diamonds rolled into her skirt and eventually put them in her mouth and swallowed them when she saw they were examining inside people’s mouths, and pulling gold teeth (@1hr18min). After this, there is no further mention of the diamonds in her ST; they are a thing of the past. In her mind at this time in 1995, she may have visualized them as tiny diamonds, which is why she could use them to “buy bread.”

(FD) She swallows the (four) diamonds for the first time and retrieves them the next day in the latrine, continuing to do this throughout her time of incarceration. Her insistence on keeping her mother’s diamonds is a major theme of the book. She also writes that the workers examining inside mouths during the initial disinfection “were removing fillings and crowns, and pulling gold teeth” (p. 36).

The pulling of the gold teeth is not believable, as it would have caused excruciating pain, a bloody mess and infection. Gold teeth were only removed from corpses.

(LD) She talks of her first time swallowing the diamonds, and says “The whole time I was in the camp, I swallowed the diamonds … so everytime I swallowed them, I had to find them again.” She adds: “(In the latrine) I never sat on the hole, because I had to find my diamonds.” Said she would rinse them off “in the mud, or […] in the soup that we were gonna get.” (Unbelievable! That would be a serious crime for which she could truly be shot.) One day she was caught defecating in the corner and had to swallow the diamonds without “rinsing them off.” This filthy stuff is not repeated in the book.
Joachim Neander also has a long article on her here. Neander is a Holocaust defender but he is relatively reasonable one. He actually had an account on the old CODOH forum.
https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot ... ct-or.html
Incredulity Enthusiast
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 3458
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am
Location: 5th Circle of Hell

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Stubble »

It is also covered in 'The Last Days of the Big Lie' by Eric. (The evolution of her poop diamonds story)



Hopefully the audio is not garbage. These videos have been copied so many times some of them sound like someone shouting down a brass hallway full of mirrors or something.

Also, The Shoah Foundation won't let me search or view their catalog without an account. I'm sure sheckles are involved. I decline.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1685
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Archie »

Wetzelrad wrote: Tue Feb 03, 2026 5:20 pm You're the first to uncover this connection. You continue to impress me with the things you discover.

1982 versus 1995. Is this plagiarism? Holocaust fiction spilling over into Holocaust non-fiction?
Starting to see these stories through the lens of fiction can be an lightbulp moment for people, I think. A few years ago there was a show called Hunters and there were murmurs from the memorial museums and the like because the show had camp atrocity flashbacks that were completely made up and weren't part of the Holocaust canon.

Here's an example where the prisoners were forced to play in a bloody human chess game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS8dVVGCk6Y

I think they get understandably nervous about people blurring the line because they don't want people to consider that many these stories could be fictional.
Someone should ask the Zisblatt family if Apt Pupil or Different Seasons appears in their library or if Irene was ever a fan of Stephen King.

Then again, swallowing diamonds is a trope of many stories related and unrelated to the Holocaust. Any of these could have been the spark of inspiration for her. I've never actually watched Schindler's List but apparently there is a scene in that movie about parents in the Krakow Ghetto feeding their children bread-wrapped diamonds. Being as Schindler's List was released in 1993, and Zisblatt said that seeing this was what spurred her to write her book, this may be a more likely origin for her diamond story.
As I see it,

If the story is true, that would mean King made up a story and, amazingly, it later emerged that it actually happened to someone. I rate this possibility low as even the mainstream is skeptical of Zisblatt at this point.

Assuming the story is fiction, then either
A - Zisblatt borrowed the story from King directly (or heard it from someone who got it from King)
B - Zisblatt made up the same story independently
C - Both Zisblatt and King owe the story to some earlier, unidentified source

A seems very believable to me. I was thinking B seemed like a big stretch given that the repeated re-swallowing and other details seem too distinctive. But on the other hand, if she mentioned the diamonds in the original Shoah interview and was later asked what happened to them, there are really only so many ways to answer that question. She either passed them and they were lost or ... So while I think this is least likely, I do have to admit that upon reflection it's not absurd to think she could have coincidently ended up in the same place. C can't be ruled out, but I can't recall anything. One lead here is that King in the book talks about pulpy Nazi/concentration camp themed horror magazines (maybe in the vein of Ilse, She Wolf of the SS). If King borrowed it from somewhere, these pulp mags might be the best candidate.

I don't know how much effort should be put into this since Zisblatt is only of marginal importance. I noticed this purely by accident. I picked up the book to read the original stories for Shawshank Redemption and Stand By Me. I gave Apt Pupil a try since it was included in the same volume. There's actually a movie version of Apt Pupil that came out in 1998 which is coincidentally the same year as The Last Days. She probably could not have seen it before filming Last Days (and I don't know if this diamond bit is even in the movie), but it would have been in production which might have given the book a little boost around that time.
Incredulity Enthusiast
B
Booze
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2025 11:35 pm

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Booze »

Archie wrote: Tue Feb 03, 2026 2:55 pm There are lots of stories about people hiding valuables in bodily orifices, but I don't recall an earlier example of this specific story of swallowing diamonds, defecating them out, and re-swallowing them repeatedly.
On the off chance that someone might have seen and saved this story or is aware of it. A 'survivor' (I think it was a woman but I'm not certain) claimed that she was holding the only surviving photo of family members and ended up hiding it in her rectum when she was in the shower.
B
Booze
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2025 11:35 pm

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Booze »

Archie wrote: Tue Feb 03, 2026 2:55 pm This all got me wondering if this story had always been "around" or if it's something King made up in 1976. If King is the earliest example of this story, then most likely Zisblat directly or indirectly got the story from Apt Pupil (that seems more plausible than her independently coming up with the same story as it's quite specific).
I think it's an unavoidable given that if the King story predated hers, that she hijacked it.
Nice find.
W
Wetzelrad
Posts: 649
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:35 am

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Wetzelrad »

Archie wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 3:36 am I was thinking B seemed like a big stretch given that the repeated re-swallowing and other details seem too distinctive.
It is specifically the re-swallowing that makes Zisblatt's story distinctive, and that's why it's plausible that she got it from Stephen King.
Archie wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 3:36 am But on the other hand, if she mentioned the diamonds in the original Shoah interview and was later asked what happened to them, there are really only so many ways to answer that question. She either passed them and they were lost or ... So while I think this is least likely, I do have to admit that upon reflection it's not absurd to think she could have coincidently ended up in the same place.
Maybe. But if Zisblatt did come up with "re-swallowing" on her own, then I still think she was inspired by the diamond story in Schindler's List. And here is where I would like to introduce Nuisia Horowitz who is given credit for that story. Horowitz is still living and a few years yonger than Zisblatt. Her name today is something like Bronislawa Niusia Horowitz Karakulska. According to video interviews her story bears many similarities to Zisblatt's. Here are some excerpts crudely translated:
Spoiler
Twice in Auschwitz I was taken to the crematorium. Twice. Once I was saved by a female guard to whom mother had given a diamond that she had swallowed. And this is a scene that I gave to Spielberg for the film. My mother swallowed a diamond, gave it to this female guard, and the guard pulled me out of the crowd. And I survived.

https://youtu.be/mzGMt7NNLG4?t=387
They told us to strip naked, that a bath would be taken, we had our hair cut, they shaved our heads, and so on and so forth and so on, it was a big scare for my mother. She was so smart, I don't know how. When the idea came to her mind that she swallowed diamond and had it inside her body all the time, someone must have talked her into it. I don't think it was her initiative, it wasn't her idea for sure. But there came a moment when she I don't know how she's going to do it, but I was witness of it, anyway, she had diamond somewhere. SS-women guards were constantly coming in and out, wearing such hats, German SS uniforms, they're beaten us on faces.
[...]
And there came a moment when I was taken to the crematorium (Auschwitz) there was a selection process because I was small and skinny.
[...]
So for the first time, for the first time, my mother's diamond saved my life save me because my mother gave diamond to SS-woman called Alice Orlovsky, just bribed her. Orlovsky, the huge tall woman whose face I will never forget for the rest of my life, she pulled me out of the crowd, I was that tall. Maybe she pulled me out of the crowd, she took my hand, my mother came over and bribed her with diamond. And SS-woman put me back in line. It was the first time. How I experienced it, I remember that I survived.
[...]
I must tell you that the film [Schindler's List] is absolutely Hollywood, there are a lot of scenes that never took place at all, so the story with this diamond is shown completely differently.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQ9QHluWfSc&t=2730s
So in both cases they were young girls sent to Auschwitz, the diamond/s belonged to their mothers, and one of the ways they hid the diamond/s is by swallowing them, but where Zisblatt retained her diamonds by repeatedly swallowing them, Horowitz's mother used her diamond as a bribe to pull her out of selection.

Possibly there is more to discover here. When did Horowitz first tell this story? Could King have been inspired by Horowitz or vice versa? Can someone familiar with these stories find more similarities between them? But I will leave it here.
User avatar
Eye of Zyclone
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2025 3:12 pm

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Eye of Zyclone »

THE ROLE OF DIAMONDS IN JEWISH FAITH AND CULTURE
26.09.18

Over the centuries, Jews have had a special connection to the diamond trade.

Jews and Diamonds in Europe

During the middle ages and afterwards, Jewish diamond trade bloomed. Polishing does not require much space or equipment. In the case of danger, they could quickly pack up and leave. Additionally, diamonds and gemstones are small items bearing a high value, easy to move and hide. For a persecuted minority, it was an excellent way to maintain wealth and move it if need be.

https://en.israelidiamond.co.il/diamond ... ish-faith/
Jews and Diamonds

Image

Netflix's Rough Diamonds shines a light on the role of Jews in the diamond trade.

Netflix’s new drama Rough Diamonds is one of their top-10 series at the moment. Set in Antwerp’s Hasidic Jewish community where many members work in the diamond trade, Rough Diamonds follows the fortunes of the longstanding Belgian Jewish family the Wolfsons, who’ve been trading diamonds for 150 years.

The world’s diamond industry has been considered an intensely Jewish field.

In Europe during the Middle Ages, Jews were well placed to become diamond traders. Restricted to money-lending in many areas, Jews became de facto bankers and pawn brokers to the rich, often receiving gems and other precious objects as payment when debts came due. Some Jews began to focus on gem polishing and trading.

Jewelry-making equipment is relatively small and portable, making it easy for Jews to pack up and move when local authorities crack down on local Jewish communities.

https://aish.com/jews-and-diamonds-6-facts/
"Holocaust deniers are very slick people. They justify everything they say with facts and figures."
H
HeiligeSturmV2
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:32 pm

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by HeiligeSturmV2 »

Archie wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 3:36 am There's actually a movie version of Apt Pupil that came out in 1998 which is coincidentally the same year as The Last Days. She probably could not have seen it before filming Last Days (and I don't know if this diamond bit is even in the movie), but it would have been in production which might have given the book a little boost around that time.
No mention of diamonds in the movie version of Apt Pupil.
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1685
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Archie »

Wetzelrad wrote: Tue Feb 03, 2026 5:20 pm Then again, swallowing diamonds is a trope of many stories related and unrelated to the Holocaust. Any of these could have been the spark of inspiration for her. I've never actually watched Schindler's List but apparently there is a scene in that movie about parents in the Krakow Ghetto feeding their children bread-wrapped diamonds. Being as Schindler's List was released in 1993, and Zisblatt said that seeing this was what spurred her to write her book, this may be a more likely origin for her diamond story.
I was thinking about this and was realizing just how extremely common it is in fiction to have have people swallowing valuables, keys, and so forth.

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/ ... llowTheKey
https://www.imdb.com/search/title/?keyw ... e=keywords

But I can't find anything besides King and Zisblatt with the repeated re-swallowing, before or after. So it's a quite distinctive elaboration of a familiar trope. I lean toward King being the originator of this idea since I can't find anything else and he is certainly a good candidate (it is his job after all to come up with stuff like that).

The similarities between Apt Pupil and Zisblatt (all in a concentration camp context)
-Diamond
-Passed from mother to daughter
-Swallowed
-Passed and re-swallowed repeatedly

That's a lot of hits. Schindler's List is missing the last one which is the most important but is also a little more generic than the mother-to-daughter idea. Whatever the exact dependence, this story fits comfortably within the realm of fiction, being a fanciful extension of a familiar cliche.

The Blobel-flamethrower thread got me thinking about this again since there's a similar question of influence, coincidence, etc. Bombsaway was arguing that the flamethrower was an absolute bull's-eye, but I was thinking about how much weaker it is than the multiple, highly distinctive similarities above.
Incredulity Enthusiast
User avatar
Eye of Zyclone
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2025 3:12 pm

Re: Prior sources for the Zisblatt diamond story?

Post by Eye of Zyclone »

Archie wrote: Sat May 09, 2026 3:41 pm I was thinking about this and was realizing just how extremely common it is in fiction to have have people swallowing valuables, keys, and so forth.

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/ ... llowTheKey
https://www.imdb.com/search/title/?keyw ... e=keywords

But I can't find anything besides King and Zisblatt with the repeated re-swallowing, before or after. So it's a quite distinctive elaboration of a familiar trope. I lean toward King being the originator of this idea since I can't find anything else and he is certainly a good candidate (it is his job after all to come up with stuff like that).

The similarities between Apt Pupil and Zisblatt (all in a concentration camp context)
-Diamond
-Passed from mother to daughter
-Swallowed
-Passed and re-swallowed repeatedly

That's a lot of hits. Schindler's List is missing the last one which is the most important but is also a little more generic than the mother-to-daughter idea. Whatever the exact dependence, this story fits comfortably within the realm of fiction, being a fanciful extension of a familiar cliche.
Logical. Scatological. :twisted:
On The Jews and Their Obsession with Feces

Image

The disturbing Jewish obsession of feces is very real. Many Jews openly admit their deranged fixation on fecal matter.

In an article called The Past, and Future, of Jewish Humor, the Jewish writer Uriel Heilman writes:
“And if it’s scatological, all the better.”

“For a Jew, a bowel movement is an event,” Waldoks declared. “That’s why there’s so much bathroom humor.”(1)
Tablet magazine columnist Marjorie Ingall had this to say about the Jewish fecal obsession:
“Jews have a fine tradition of scatological humor.” “When new [Jewish] moms get together they love talking about poop.”(2)
In a weird article about toilet training, Jewess Carla Naumburg proudly states:
“We talk about poop a lot in my family. You might think it’s just because we’re the parents of a toddler and an infant, and that’s definitely part of it. But we’re also Jews, so it comes naturally to us.”(3)
Jewish actress Tori Spelling made a myspace entry about plunging a toilet for her toddler entitled Poo’s funny…Sometimes! Here’s what she said:
“I’m NOT shit shy. In fact, I’m a Poo Fanatic and a fart joke fan to the extreme. I even have the childhood cartoon books “The Gas We Pass” and “Everybody Poo’s!” proudly displayed on my mantle while my unused copy of “War and Peace” collects dust buried in my sock drawer. Hey, I’m a self-professed and mildly obsessed Poo Lover and not ashamed to admit it. Shit’s funny!”
The sick and unhealthy Jewish obsession has also been recognized by many well respected researchers. Michael Collins Piper of American Free Press had the following in his book The Confessions of an Anti-Semite:
“And speaking of toilet “humor,” I must be honest in saying that it’s probably no coincidence that, over the years, when I’ve received emails from people upset about my opposition to Israel that the messages-which are usually posed in a scoffing, sarcastic, belittling tone-most always contain allusions to bodily functions in one form or another. I do not exaggerate. In fact, not once, but twice-and I kid you not-Jewish critics have even made references to dirty diapers, the presumptive “humor” being in the fact, as the writers made clear, that my last name [Piper] happens to rhyme with diaper. Juvenile, to be sure, but a sad reflection on the peculiar mindset of my Jewish critics.”
The late Dr. William Pierce of the National Alliance made these remarks in an April 2001 radio broadcast/article entitled Shocking Differences:
“This is something I first noticed when I was a junior high school student in Dallas, Texas. The school I attended was in one of Dallas’ wealthier suburbs, and there were a number of Jews in the school. What I and several of my classmates noticed about the Jews was their uniquely Jewish sense of humor. One doesn’t expect much delicacy in the jokes told by 14-year-olds, of course, but the thing that made the jokes that appealed especially to the Jews stand out was their scatological content. Nearly every Jewish joke involved excrement in one way or another. As I said, this Jewish tendency was so pronounced that I and my Gentile classmates noticed it and commented on it, even though we didn’t understand it. And it wasn’t that we had an exceptionally large number of budding Howard Sterns among our Jewish classmates. The inclination toward scatology is a general Jewish characteristic. Jews themselves, including Jewish psychologists, have commented on this Jewish trait often, explaining it in terms of the collective Jewish experience throughout history. It is real, and it is quite noticeable.”
He then tells an anecdote about Jewish run MTV:
“I don’t watch MTV myself, and I suspect that most White parents of teenaged girls, even very liberal and trendy parents, also don’t pay attention to what their daughters are being indoctrinated with by Sumner Redstone’s MTV. An example of which I recently became aware was brought to my attention by the filing just last week of a lawsuit against MTV in Los Angeles Superior Court. Let me give you the details: three months ago, on January 21, MTV was taping a pilot for a new show called Dude, This Sucks. Some teenaged girls were visiting the studio during the taping. A studio employee instructed them to stand on the stage in a certain place for a part of the show in which a pair of performers known as the “Shower Rangers” were to go through their routine. The girls were not told what the performance would be or how they would be involved in it.

The “Shower Rangers” were two men dressed in Boy Scout uniforms. They came on stage, turned their backs to the camera and to the teenaged spectators on the stage, dropped their trousers, bent over, and let fly with a shower of semi-liquid feces, spattering the unsuspecting girls from head to foot. Apparently they had dosed themselves with a powerful laxative prior to the performance.

To Jews, including billionaire Jewish media moguls like the owner of CBS and MTV, Sumner Redstone, this sort of thing is hilariously funny. It’s their idea of humor. Unfortunately for MTV, however, the girls who were sprayed by MTV’s “Shower Rangers” weren’t amused, nor were their parents. Last week two of the girls sued. One of them told the court:
“We were having a good time until the second act of Dude, This Sucks went on. All of a sudden I was smelling something disgusting, and I started to gag. I looked around at my friends. They were covered in something. As I looked down at myself I realized that I was too.”
Another of the plaintiffs, 14-year-old Kelly Sloat, spoke of the humiliation the girls felt when they returned to school:
“Everyone knew about it, even some of the teachers. Most of the kids were cracking jokes or wouldn’t come near us because, even though we washed off the feces, they said we smelled. I will never, ever forget what a horrible experience this was.”


The Entertainment Industry

The Jewish obsession with fecal matter is most apparent in Hollywood movies. The film Bridesmaids, directed by Jew Paul Feig, contains a scene in which the female cast all get food poisoning. What follows is a truly sickening orgy of women defecating and vomiting all over the place. One girl throws up all over a toilet. Another then comes in and throws up on the back of the first one’s head, while a fat woman sits on the sink next to them spraying diarrhea into it and screaming. The bride then runs into the middle of a busy street and defecates all over the inside of her wedding gown. All of this is presumably supposed to be funny.

Vulgar Jewish and Hillary Clinton supporter Sarah Silverman has built a whole career on her sick and Jewish obsession with feces. The following are the lyrics from a song(4) she sings called The Poop Song:
It was brown and it had raisins
And we flushed it for that reason
This is who your daughters have to look up to
This is a poop song
This is a poop song
I was walking through the mall
And I had to make a poop
This is a poop song
This is a poop song
We pooped at the mall today
We pooped at the mall

Another example of disgusting, fecal obsession comes from degenerate Jewish pedophile Allen Ginsberg. Ginsberg was an open pedophile and founding member of NAMBLA, which stands for the North American Man/Boy Love Association. His writings were made popular by the Jew controlled media and consist of the most depraved Jewish filth that one could ever imagine.

This is from a poem that he wrote about his sick and dying mother (in which he at one point contemplates having sex with) called Kaddish:
“One night, sudden attack—her noise in the bathroom—like croaking up her soul—convulsions and red vomit coming out of her mouth—diarrhea water exploding from her behind—on all fours in front of the toilet—urine running between her legs—left retching on the tile floor smeared with her black feces—unfainted—“(5)

Palestine

Israeli Jews over in illegally occupied Palestine have made playing with their feces into somewhat of a national hobby. Pretty sickening stuff. One of the favorite hobbies of the occupying Jews include driving around spraying feces at Palestinians and their homes with a giant fire hose and defecating all over the inside of Palestinian homes after they’ve invaded and ransacked them.

One Palestinian woman described the antics of the Israeli occupational army of cowards as thus:
“The smell was terrible. The food was everywhere. Very disgusting smell. They put shit in the sinks, shit everywhere. Our clothes were everywhere. The last time they invaded, it was easy. They broke everything and we fixed it. But this time, they put shit everywhere: in cupboards, on beds — my bed is full of shit.”
She goes on:
“A minute ago, Sabreen opened her clothing cupboard: there was a bowl of shit in it! They used our clothes for the toilet. They broke the door of the bathroom and brought it into our room. I don’t know why.”(6)

The Holohoax

The Holocaust is a complete jewish fraud. All of the stories about it are completely made up, and they almost all include feces. One “survivor” described his experience in the camps like this:
“Filth was also tremendous. Filth. It was filthy. It was filthy even in the building where we lived. I mean, in the winter time. I mean, the toilet was…it was…it was ice. It was all ice. And then the feces and the urine all over, was overflowing…overflowing there.”(7)
Perhaps the most comical story is by Jew Irene Zisblatt, the infamous “defecating diamonds” hoaxer from top Jew propagandist Steven Spielberg’s Oscar-winning Last Days documentary. She claims to have preserved diamonds that her mother gave her by eating them daily and then defecating them out. According to the story, she then proceeded to rummage through her feces on the floor of the toilet house with her bare hands to find the diamonds, and then ate them again without having washed them, all to repeat the process the next day for two years straight. What the hell kind of sick mind would come up with a story like that?

In another fictional tale from this demented liar, she explains being inside of a homicidal gas chamber in which the Jews were forced to wade around naked in their own bodily fluids. If they felt the need to go to the bathroom they had no choice but to “go where they stood” down their legs and on their feet.


Jewish fecal freak Stephen Spielberg’s Oscar-winning Holohoax propaganda film Schindler’s List features a scene in which young kids hideout from the “evil Nazis” inside of a toilet—neck deep in urine and feces.

Image

Image

Jewish author, Joseph E. Tenenbaum, wrote about Jews having sex while inside of a feces filled toilet.

In Search of a Lost People: The Old and the New Poland he writes:
“I heard harrowing stories of these latrines of Birkenau, of how the children hid for hours in the foulness, to escape gassing, how love went on in these places and sexes mated in the dung under the threat of instantaneous death when discovered; how business thrived and gossip thrilled in these latrines. If you lost your footing in the heat of passion, you could drown!!”(9)

Psychoanalysis

The Jewish pseudo-science of psychoanalysis is also loaded with fecal obsession. Jew Sigmund Freud, was himself obsessed with bathroom behavior and described the second stage of his thoroughly disturbing “psychosexual development” theory as the “anal stage,” in which, around the age of two, pleasurable sensations become centered on the anus, and children become fascinated by their own feces. This is the stage of life where “anal personalities” could develop, he claimed.

A bizarre offshoot of psychology led by Jew Lloyd deMause called Psychohistory takes the Jewish fecal obsession a step further and asserts that both the Holocaust and WWII were natural outcomes of incredibly sadistic behavior practiced on infants by the average German mother.

Here are a few passages written by deMause:
“A visitor from England described the German baby as “a piteous object; it is pinioned and bound up like a mummy in yards of bandages…it is never bathed…Its head is never touched with soap and water until it is eight or ten months old.” Their feces and urine was so regularly left on their bodies that they were covered with lice and other vermin attracted to their excreta, and since the swaddling bandages were very tight and covered their arms as well as their bodies, they could not prevent the vermin from drinking their blood. Their parents considered them so disgusting they called them “filthy lice-covered babies,” and often put them, swaddled, in a bag, which they hung on the wall or on a tree while the mothers did other tasks.The fear of being poisoned by lice was daily embedded in the fearful alter of the baby . . . ”
The fecal obsessed Jew then proceeds to project his German shit-baby theory onto the so-called mistreatment of Jews by the Third Reich:
“Jews were rounded up and made into “Bad Selves”—shit-babies—putting them into overcrowded death camps and telling them: “You’ll be eaten by lice, you’ll rot in your own shit…All are going to die.” Jews were called “pestiferous bacillus carriers,” made to live like lice-covered babies, forced to lie in barracks like they themselves were forced to live in their swaddling bands, “awash with urine and feces, forced to eat their own feces, and finally dying in showers covered with their excrement.” Repeating their parents’ curses at them as shit-babies, their guards told them “You’ll be eaten by lice; you’ll rot in your own shit, you filthy shitface.” As they killed Jews, guards told them what they imagined their mothers felt as they killed their newborn siblings: “Because you’re dirty you have to die.” They were all Bad Shit-Babies. They had to die. If they were not killed, Nazis said they would “gobble up the breast of Germany!”
The Jewish media whore and fecal obsessed Michael Lewis also wrote about the supposed fecal obsession of the Germans. In an article entitled “It’s the Economy, Dummkopf!” in the September 2011 edition of Vanity Fair he goes on a fecal-filled rant, making outrageous claims such as the following:
“After the war, Hitler’s doctors told U.S. intelligence officers that their patient had devoted surprising energy to examining his own feces, and there was pretty strong evidence that one of his favorite things to do with women was to have them poop on him.”
and
“Naked women fought in a metaphorical ring of filth while the spectators wore plastic caps, a sort of head condom, to avoid being splattered. “Thus,” wrote Dundes, “the audience can remain clean while enjoying dirt!” Germans longed to be near the shit, but not in it.”(9)
1. http://njjewishnews.com/njjn.com/120706 ... Redux.html
2. http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-life-an ... f-the-joke
3. http://www.kveller.com/baby_and_toddler ... ning.shtml
4. youtube.com/watch?v=8U3e0-RHlfc
5. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/49313/kaddish
6. http://uruknet.info/?p=m51392&hd=&size=1&l=e
7. https://www.ushmm.org/outreach/en/media ... diaId=1094
8. https://judicial-inc-archive.blogspot.c ... hared.html
9. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2011/09/europe-201109
"Holocaust deniers are very slick people. They justify everything they say with facts and figures."
Post Reply