The case against gassing compared to shooting.

A containment zone for disruptive posters
K
Keen
Posts: 1444
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The case against gassing compared to shooting.

Post by Keen »

HansHill wrote: Tue May 26, 2026 11:01 am Stop distorting arguments and arguing in bad faith. This is why you are contained to your slop bin.
Come on HansHill, you know it is incapable of doing anything in good faith.

What should stop is revisionists playing the game that it wants revisionists to play.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 1444
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The case against gassing compared to shooting.

Post by Keen »

Wetzelrad wrote: Tue May 26, 2026 5:08 pm You are now denying that evidence is evidence while avoiding a very simple question.

...

In sum, your explanation is totally incoherent, nonsensical, and contradicted by the evidential record.
Avoiding simple questions is what it does as it cravenly runs from its burden of proof.

It is playing the only game it can.

The question should be: Why do revisionists continue to play games with it?

Talk about nonsensical.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 1444
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The case against gassing compared to shooting.

Post by Keen »

Wetzelrad wrote: Tue May 26, 2026 5:14 pm Insane behavior.
So why do you participate in the mentally ill HC cult member's insanity?
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 1444
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The case against gassing compared to shooting.

Post by Keen »

Nesserto wrote: Tue May 26, 2026 11:29 am What is the "case"?
The case is explained here:

viewtopic.php?p=24672#p24672

and here:

viewtopic.php?p=24673#p24673
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Post Reply