Comments on other threads.

[Stubble]

Excellent posts EoZ, as always Sir.

[Nessie]

...

Again, you have ignored that to challenge the Holocaust and to prove France was not involved, needs evidence.

Nope. This is again your usual reverse burden of proof. No evidence is needed to challenge an unproven thing. Unicorns are not real until proven unreal. They are unreal until proven real. Do you understand how it works now ?

The Holocaust as a hoax, with millions of Jews not murdered, is an unproven thing. According to you, no evidence is needed to challenge the unproven claim that the Holocaust as a hoax, with millions of Jews not murdered.

In reality if someone claims there are unicorns, the burden of proof is on them to prove there are unicorns. If someone claims there are no unicorns, the burden of proof is on them to prove there are no unicorns.

You are desperately trying to dodge your burden of proof, that the French governments since WWII, have knowingly participated in the faking of the killing of tens of thousands of Jews deported from France, primarily to A-B.

[HansHill]

Nessie Status = Ragdolled

[Eye of Zyclone]

You are still demanding that I believe in a false narrative without any evidence. Prove to me that the Jews handed over to the Nazis, that the French accept were murdered, did in fact live and were liberated in 1945.

Nope. Prove me they were murdered or go back to hunting dragons and witches in the Middle Ages, where your flawed burden of proof belongs.

If I claim that the British bombing raid on Dresden was a hoax, is there no burden of proof on me to prove that hoax?

No, there is no burden of proof on you to prove that the British bombing raid on Dresden didn't happen. How could you prove a negative ?
As accusers, the burden of proof is on those who say that it happened. All you need to do to prove that the British bombing raid on Dresden didn't happen is to show that their proofs are not solid evidence and that their accusation rests on nothing.

You are claiming that there is no burden of proof on you to claim that the mass murder of French Jews at A-B is a hoax and that I have to prove they were mass murdered.

Yes. What is true for one murder is, of course, also true for one million murders. QED. A simple matter of consistency and logic.

The politicians of Denmark and Finland were the only two who stood up to Zionism and refused to participate in the hoax. You really expect me to believe that, with no evidence!

Are you saying this because Denmark and Finland don't have antirevisionist laws YET ? The most likely explanation is that Denmark and Finland are just too unimportant and forgotten countries for having already been put under pressure about it. But be patient. It will come when necessary or if necessary someday.

Why are Finland and Denmark able to not participate in the hoax? But every other European country has to?

They are able to not participate in the hoax because they have not yet been pressured for doing it so far.

Using the only two European countries that have not yet been pressured into passing gag laws against Holocaust revisionism to "prove" that Zionist organizations don't pressure European countries into passing gag laws against Holocaust revisionism, is one of your worst distortions so far !!! What a crook !!

[Eye of Zyclone]

According to you, no evidence is needed to challenge the unproven claim that the Holocaust as a hoax, with millions of Jews not murdered.

In reality if someone claims there are unicorns, the burden of proof is on them to prove there are unicorns. If someone claims there are no unicorns, the burden of proof is on them to prove there are no unicorns.

How could someone possibly prove that there are no unicorns ?!?

Excellent posts EoZ, as always Sir.

Thank you, Stub.

[Stubble]

I would like to take this opportunity to appreciate that Caroline Sturdy Colls and Dr Nick Terry are both content to drive a freight car over their witnesses and say 'they must have been buried some place else' because the forensic evidence does not match the claim.

Neither one can tell me who is missing, but, they know they are missing, because the chart says so, haven't you seen the chart? And the shoes?

[Eye of Zyclone]

I would like to take this opportunity to appreciate that Caroline Sturdy Colls and Dr Nick Terry are both content to drive a freight car over their witnesses and say 'they must have been buried some place else' because the forensic evidence does not match the claim.

Neither one can tell me who is missing, but, they know they are missing, because the chart says so, haven't you seen the chart? And the shoes?

"Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe." - Saint Augustine, Sermon 43

[Stubble]

I would like to take this opportunity to appreciate that Caroline Sturdy Colls and Dr Nick Terry are both content to drive a freight car over their witnesses and say 'they must have been buried some place else' because the forensic evidence does not match the claim.

Neither one can tell me who is missing, but, they know they are missing, because the chart says so, haven't you seen the chart? And the shoes?

"Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe." - Saint Augustine, Sermon 43

They, have faith, unwavering faith. Best evidence for the Holocaust is eyewitness accounts, until it isn't.

I think Wiernik saying they hid a corpse volcano with Christmas Trees was a clue shaggy. Can't let a thing like that, or, the apostles not finding any mass graves get in the way though.

The chart, it says people are missing. Of course I don't know their names, but, I have their shoes! Look at the shoes! Who would leave this many shoes!

[Eye of Zyclone]

I would like to take this opportunity to appreciate that Caroline Sturdy Colls and Dr Nick Terry are both content to drive a freight car over their witnesses and say 'they must have been buried some place else' because the forensic evidence does not match the claim.

Neither one can tell me who is missing, but, they know they are missing, because the chart says so, haven't you seen the chart? And the shoes?

"Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe." - Saint Augustine, Sermon 43

They, have faith, unwavering faith. Best evidence for the Holocaust is eyewitness accounts, until it isn't.

It was also the best evidence for human soap, until it was not any more.

I think Wiernik saying they hid a corpse volcano with Christmas Trees was a clue shaggy. Can't let a thing like that, or, the apostles not finding any mass graves get in the way though.

The chart, it says people are missing. Of course I don't know their names, but, I have their shoes! Look at the shoes! Who would leave this many shoes!

And don't forget the lampshades made out of "lights unto the nations" !!





The Yiddish word for "confirmation bias" is "corroboration... muh circumstancial evidence"...

[Stubble]

Spoiler

"Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe." - Saint Augustine, Sermon 43

They, have faith, unwavering faith. Best evidence for the Holocaust is eyewitness accounts, until it isn't.

It was also the best evidence for human soap, until it was not any more.

I think Wiernik saying they hid a corpse volcano with Christmas Trees was a clue shaggy. Can't let a thing like that, or, the apostles not finding any mass graves get in the way though.

The chart, it says people are missing. Of course I don't know their names, but, I have their shoes! Look at the shoes! Who would leave this many shoes!

And don't forget the lampshades made out of "lights unto the nations" !!





The Yiddish word for "confirmation bias" is "corroboration... muh circumstancial evidence"...

They, buried soap. You can visit a soap grave, to this day, and people still leave stuff like flowers and wreaths.

[Eye of Zyclone]

They, buried soap. You can visit a soap grave, to this day, and people still leave stuff like flowers and wreaths.

Yeah, I know. Stubbornly sticking to their hateful lies is at the core of Jewishness.

[Eye of Zyclone]

They, buried soap. You can visit a soap grave, to this day, and people still leave stuff like flowers and wreaths.

Fun fact : Like the gas-chamber lie, the human-soap lie was an atrocity story rehashed from the First World War. And the equally-mendacious side story of some human soap being buried by the Germans with full military honours made the propagandists who had concocted and disseminated this fake news laugh to tears. I wonder if those laughing Jews suspected that their race-fellows would actually do it 30 years later.

[Nessie]

Nope. Prove me they were murdered or go back to hunting dragons and witches in the Middle Ages, where your flawed burden of proof belongs.

If I claim that the British bombing raid on Dresden was a hoax, is there no burden of proof on me to prove that hoax?

No, there is no burden of proof on you to prove that the British bombing raid on Dresden didn't happen.

If a claim is made that the British did not bomb Dresden, the burden of proof is on the claimant.

How could you prove a negative ?

It is indicative of your lack of understanding about evidence and the burden of proof, that you do not know how to prove a negative. With regards to the bombing of Dresden, if photos show an intact city centre and residents give statements that there were no bombs, that would prove the claim the claim of a bombing raid on Dresden did not happen.

As accusers, the burden of proof is on those who say that it happened.

As accusers, there is a burden of proof on those who say the Holocaust was a hoax.

All you need to do to prove that the British bombing raid on Dresden didn't happen is to show that their proofs are not solid evidence and that their accusation rests on nothing.

No, you provide evidence from eyewitnesses, photographs and the buildings in Dresden, to show that they were intact and that no bombing raid had happened.

You are claiming that there is no burden of proof on you to claim that the mass murder of French Jews at A-B is a hoax and that I have to prove they were mass murdered.

Yes. What is true for one murder is, of course, also true for one million murders. QED. A simple matter of consistency and logic.

If someone claims that a murder had been faked, then they need evidence the person supposedly murdered is still alive. That can be done with eyewitnesses who saw the person, or documents that record their existence, after they had supposedly been murdered.

The politicians of Denmark and Finland were the only two who stood up to Zionism and refused to participate in the hoax. You really expect me to believe that, with no evidence!

Are you saying this because Denmark and Finland don't have antirevisionist laws YET ? The most likely explanation is that Denmark and Finland are just too unimportant and forgotten countries for having already been put under pressure about it. But be patient. It will come when necessary or if necessary someday.

Why are Finland and Denmark able to not participate in the hoax? But every other European country has to?

They are able to not participate in the hoax because they have not yet been pressured for doing it so far.

Using the only two European countries that have not yet been pressured into passing gag laws against Holocaust revisionism to "prove" that Zionist organizations don't pressure European countries into passing gag laws against Holocaust revisionism, is one of your worst distortions so far !!! What a crook !!

You have no evidence Denmark and Finland have not yet been pressured into participating in a hoax, that you cannot provide any evidence to prove took place. It is so obvious you are clueless about evidencing.

[Nessie]

According to you, no evidence is needed to challenge the unproven claim that the Holocaust as a hoax, with millions of Jews not murdered.

In reality if someone claims there are unicorns, the burden of proof is on them to prove there are unicorns. If someone claims there are no unicorns, the burden of proof is on them to prove there are no unicorns.

How could someone possibly prove that there are no unicorns ?!?

A lack of unicorn specimens, remains, imagery or physical evidence to prove they exist would be suitable evidence. If you researched unicorns, you would find they are a literary invention, from mythology, with no physical evidence to prove they existed.

You are operating under the faulty belief that a negative claim that something did not happen or exist, has no burden of proof.

[Eye of Zyclone]

According to you, no evidence is needed to challenge the unproven claim that the Holocaust as a hoax, with millions of Jews not murdered.

In reality if someone claims there are unicorns, the burden of proof is on them to prove there are unicorns. If someone claims there are no unicorns, the burden of proof is on them to prove there are no unicorns.

How could someone possibly prove that there are no unicorns ?!?

A lack of unicorn specimens, remains, imagery or physical evidence to prove they exist would be suitable evidence. If you researched unicorns, you would find they are a literary invention, from mythology, with no physical evidence to prove they existed.

Or in other words, the lack of tangible evidence for the existence of unicorns proves that there are no unicorns, making unicorn denial equivalent to Holocaust denial. QED

You are operating under the faulty belief that a negative claim that something did not happen or exist, has no burden of proof.

Are you claiming that biologists must prove that unicorns don't exist or else unicorns exist ?