What is evidence? [remedial education series]

[Keen]

There is corroborating evidence... Therefore they existed and the witnesses did not lie.

nessie:

A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.

So a pit containing the remains of multiple people would be, according to you, a mass grave, correct?

What if the pit contained the bones of multiple animals - would you still consider that to be a "mass grave"?

When surveys find large areas of disturbed ground, with identifiable pits, littered with human remains...

"Human remains" you say? Where are the skulls?

Photos of TII, from the 1945 surveys, showing the site after grave robbing activity

nessie, are the above photos of a mass grave / mass graves at Treblinka II - Yes. - or - No. - ??

If your answer is - Yes. - then;

Are they photos of the same mass grave taken from different angles, or two separate mass graves?

Also, If your answer is - Yes. - then;

What is the number / numbers for this / these grave / graves?



We still haven't seen so-much-as a shoe box amount of cremated remains.

What are you waiting for nessie?

What are you so afraid of?

[Nessie]

viewtopic.php?p=25838#p25838

The bogus claims of a genocide by mass-gassing at the sites claimed, by the methods claimed, on the scale claimed has been refuted.

That claim is false, because to refute the evidence of mass gassings at certain sites, you would need new evidence. For example, people who worked at those sites who stated there were no mass gassings and what took place instead, which happened when claims were made about mass gassing at Dachau and Bergen-Belsen. The SS camp staff denied there had been gassings. They could account for the prisoners, with camp documents, showing transports and no mass disappearance of people shortly after they arrived. That leads to another example of evidence that would refute the mass gassing claims, which would be documents recording mass transports back out of the camps, meaning, obviously those people cannot have been killed.

Evidence is not someone who denies gassings took place, explaining why they deny. Their opinion on the viability of gas chambers, or the possibilities of killing so many people, is not evidence.

[Keen]

To refute the evidence of mass gassings at certain sites, you would need new evidence.

If the physical evidence for an alleged crime that - HAS TO EXIST - for the crime to have

actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged crime obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.

Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.

OPENING / FUNDAMENTAL STATEMENT OF FACT: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive, unsubstantiated allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the 100 graves in question that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY SIX PEOPLE.


Note: Using the information presented on this website and applying legal standards used in U.S. courts, the above opening / fundamental statement of fact, which is written as, and can be defined as - a rebuttable presumption - can be - LEGALLY - ACCEPTED - AS - TRUE - in a U.S. court.

https://thisisaboutscience.com/