Cole is remaking his Auschwitz video

[Stubble]

Well, looks like David Cole is remaking his Auschwitz video. Hopefully he hasn't had an epiphany and decided to change the position he has had for the last 40 years with regard to homicidal gas chambers.

https://bestservedcole.substack.com/p/u ... en-doorths

And I will also mention that he hopefully does cover the actual, factual wooden doors at the supposed homicidal gas chambers.

[Wetzelrad]

It's difficult to view anything Cole does today without extreme cynicism. In this article, he claims:

If one considers what I would’ve made by acting the role deniers wanted me to, I’d have profited a good bit more than $7 grand. Indeed, the very notion I “flipped” for money is certifiably insane. There’s no money in the position I’ve held since 1994 - vigorously anti-denial but also highly critical of how orgs like the ADL and Wiesenthal Center fight denial.

But in fact he has previously talked about how lucrative his self-described "both sides" position was in the period from 1994 to 2007. From Republican Party Animal:

“Cal” sold the footage to almost every Holocaust studies department in the Western world. And then “Desmond” used Farr’s faxes (which he claimed to have bought on the Holocaust “black market”) in order to sell the “fraudulent” footage to revisionists as an example of staged Soviet fakes.

And so it went. For several years, I would sell materials to both sides. Using a complex series of DBAs, both “Cal” and “Desmond” had their own business accounts, and the money was pouring in. As my own views had become more complex when I left revisionism, I didn’t think I was completely lying, as I partially agreed with both the mainstream and the revisionist positions. But since I knew that those two “sides” could never be brought together, I realized I’d have to cater to each one individually.

Stein was becoming so well known, I even received a death threat from a neo-Nazi! Immediately seizing on the profitability of that, I decided to send a copy of the letter to the entire Tinbergen Archives mailing list, explaining to them why this letter demonstrated the need to contribute to the good works of the Tinbergen Archives. That death threat brought in a hell of a lot of money.

My Tinbergen Archives mailing list had become a hot property. [...] and I was able to trade my list for dozens of others [...] I also made some decent cash by selling the list [...]

At that point in my life, I had more money than I’d ever had [...]

So I think his statements on this matter are somewhat self-serving. Also quite funny to hear that Peter Thiel offered him money.

I'll give him credit for still being funny, with this pitch:

David Cole presents WOODEN DOORS - THE MOTION PICTURE, produced by Elon Musk and United Autists. Executive produced by JD Vance, Tucker Carlson, His Royal Highness Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, and Theo Vonn. Hosted by David Cole, with Gina Carano as the Wooden Door and David Spade as a Zyklon granule.

[Eye of Zyclone]

Big exterminationist garbage ahead! Cole is now an an antirevisionist Jew unconvincingly posturing as a whimsical moderate revisionist (implying that the real Holocaust revisionists are just extremists, "deniers" who evade the alleged compelling evidence of the Holocaust) in order to damage the revisionist movement from within.

He's no longer the young idealistic Jew he used to be when he exposed the Auschwitz scam. Getting in huge trouble only for the sake of truth is the kind of foolish things people do when they're in their twenties, not when they're in their fourties or fifties. Cole is no longer a risk-all rebellious young man at odds with his family and his co-religionists. He's now a tribalistic & realistic mature man, like most people his age. Telling lies about Israel's most precious founding myth (AKA The Holocaust) for personal & tribal gain --- as he ultimately did regarding the Reinhardt camps when he re-emerged, after several decades of flying under the radar --- was just the wisest and most reasonable choice to make for a Jew in his situation. As unsurprising as possible if I'm asked. It’s the opposite that would have surprised me.

"Old" Cole is just another Zionist Jew and he uses his former-Holocaust-revisionist status to promote Israel's best interests and deceive gullible Goyim by making them falsely believe that there exists solid evidence for the nonexistent Nazi gas chambers at the Reinhardt camps (through the misleading illusion that even "deniers" have now conceded that there were Nazi gas chambers there).

[Stubble]

For clarity, his position as of 2025;



He is sold on the Bug River murder mills.

Up until a few months ago, I thought he was in ernest, and that he and I only actually disagreed in a few places. Unfortunately, he appears to have abandoned much of his honesty and hence his appeal for me. When I thought he was just wrong about a couple of things, I wasn't opposed to him. As time has worn on and I have seen him either abuse or ignore some of the members here over on 'x', gradually I have soured.

For contrast, a 2017 interview;



Notice the difference in opinion on Auschwitz between the 2 interviews...

[Wetzelrad]

That is quite a change, Stubble. Here is a quotation from the 2017 video followed by one from 2025.

(18:17) Now one of the things that I'm very very set in my -- this is something that I feel I've researched the heck out of, and that's that there was no gassing program at Auschwitz, uh, ever -- but also not in summer of '44 when the Hungarian and some Czech Jews as well were sent there in large numbers.

(19:24) However, at Birkenau, the Jewish camp, there were rooms that definitely were used for gassing. And a couple of rooms that might have been. The ones that were definitely used for gassing in 1942 -- sometimes are called "the farmhouses", "the cottages" -- they were erased. There's nothing to -- there was nothing for me to examine, or for anyone to examine, in the late '80s early '90s. As far as the bigger rooms at Birkenau -- that are called "Crema II", "Crema III", um -- again, you can't prove a negative in that context. We do have evidence that the cottages had been used for gassing in 1942 during the typhus epidemic. Now, Rudolf Höss, the commandant of that camp, the man who would eventually be relieved of duty, nearly prosecuted by the SS for misdeeds in the camp -- but he was brought back in 1944 to handle the Hungarian transports. It is entirely plausible Rudolf Höss might have gone back to his ways of killing inmates. We have multiple questions that are open, the extent to which any gassings happened after 1942 and the extent to which Höss was acting on his own or acting on orders from Berlin. But before you say anything else, I do also wanna say, putting Auschwitz aside, and those open questions aside, and the closed questions -- I mean, there really were 100% there were gassings at those cottages in 1942. We have the testimony of the camp doctor Kremer.

He moved from being "very very" certain "that there was no gassing" to "100% there were gassings". But the evidence that he cites was already well known by 2017! This means he was not convinced by evidence but by presentation, the same as any other H believer.

As a matter of curiosity, does anyone here agree with Cole's opinion as to his VHS tape's importance? In his last few articles he makes all kinds of claims about how influential he is. Personally I've only seen his footage perhaps ~10 times on X, and that's as someone who actively seeks out Holocaust discussions. It just doesn't seem relevant to anything.

[Eye of Zyclone]

He moved from being "very very" certain "that there was no gassing" to "100% there were gassings". But the evidence that he cites was already well known by 2017! This means he was not convinced by evidence but by presentation, the same as any other H believer.

I don't believe that he was convinced at all. When he reappeared a few years ago, at first, he had planned to focus on the Reinhardt camps as an alleged newly-converted believer and "denier" bashing as an alleged whistleblower and to just let his old Auschwitz documentary die and be forgotten by more and more people. But it didn't work as planned and expected. His old Auschwitz documentary hasn't died and it has even become increasingly watched and shared in recent years. Consequently, he and his employers decided to make a new Auschwitz documentary for damage control purposes.

As a matter of curiosity, does anyone here agree with Cole's opinion as to his VHS tape's importance? In his last few articles he makes all kinds of claims about how influential he is. Personally I've only seen his footage perhaps ~10 times on X, and that's as someone who actively seeks out Holocaust discussions. It just doesn't seem relevant to anything.

Yes, I agree with Cole's opinion as to his VHS tape's importance. As far as I could see, many Goyim seem to find the revisionist arguments much more convincing when they're voiced by a Jew, that is, by someone who is not suspected of telling lies about the Holocaust out of antisemitism. Cole's old documentary is a great eye-opener for this reason. I've experienced it many times. IMO, that's why he's going to make this new video. He's patently trying to bury his old Holocaust-debunking video under this new Auschwitz video if I'm asked.

[Stubble]

That is quite a change, Stubble. Here is a quotation from the 2017 video followed by one from 2025.

(18:17) Now one of the things that I'm very very set in my -- this is something that I feel I've researched the heck out of, and that's that there was no gassing program at Auschwitz, uh, ever -- but also not in summer of '44 when the Hungarian and some Czech Jews as well were sent there in large numbers.

(19:24) However, at Birkenau, the Jewish camp, there were rooms that definitely were used for gassing. And a couple of rooms that might have been. The ones that were definitely used for gassing in 1942 -- sometimes are called "the farmhouses", "the cottages" -- they were erased. There's nothing to -- there was nothing for me to examine, or for anyone to examine, in the late '80s early '90s. As far as the bigger rooms at Birkenau -- that are called "Crema II", "Crema III", um -- again, you can't prove a negative in that context. We do have evidence that the cottages had been used for gassing in 1942 during the typhus epidemic. Now, Rudolf Höss, the commandant of that camp, the man who would eventually be relieved of duty, nearly prosecuted by the SS for misdeeds in the camp -- but he was brought back in 1944 to handle the Hungarian transports. It is entirely plausible Rudolf Höss might have gone back to his ways of killing inmates. We have multiple questions that are open, the extent to which any gassings happened after 1942 and the extent to which Höss was acting on his own or acting on orders from Berlin. But before you say anything else, I do also wanna say, putting Auschwitz aside, and those open questions aside, and the closed questions -- I mean, there really were 100% there were gassings at those cottages in 1942. We have the testimony of the camp doctor Kremer.

He moved from being "very very" certain "that there was no gassing" to "100% there were gassings". But the evidence that he cites was already well known by 2017! This means he was not convinced by evidence but by presentation, the same as any other H believer.

As a matter of curiosity, does anyone here agree with Cole's opinion as to his VHS tape's importance? In his last few articles he makes all kinds of claims about how influential he is. Personally I've only seen his footage perhaps ~10 times on X, and that's as someone who actively seeks out Holocaust discussions. It just doesn't seem relevant to anything.

I've definitely clipped his Auschwitz video and shared it around with people. This has been 'real world' face to face sharing. Their reaction to his review of the displays in the beginning is a huge red pill to a normie. It is highly effective, especially so because he has that tiny hat.

Of course, I don't present it by itself. I run it with other clips as well.

One very good prepared piece of media that includes it is called 'HoaxWave II'.



This is the oldest copy I could find. The runtime may be too long, depending on who you are pilling.

I will also say that Young Cole, while not solely responsible for my position on the Holy H, his influence was not wholly insignificant. He led me to counting Hungarian jews for example, and realizing that I didn't even have enough missing to make the mass murder story work. I lack enough missing Hungarian jews to support the Hungarian mass murder thesis, how jacked is that? (Bombsaway actually gets some credit for that too, and SanityCheck, they told me the Hungarian jews were all killed, by the hundreds of thousands. It's almost half of Auschwitz after all)

In the last few months, I have soured on Elder Stein...I didn't see the worm turn until I really looked close. Been watching the wrong Cole...

[Fred Ziffel]

He was mean to me

[Hektor]

That is quite a change, Stubble. Here is a quotation from the 2017 video followed by one from 2025.

(18:17) Now one of the things that I'm very very set in my -- this is something that I feel I've researched the heck out of, and that's that there was no gassing program at Auschwitz, uh, ever -- ....

(19:24) However, at Birkenau, the Jew... there really were 100% there were gassings at those cottages in 1942. We have the testimony of the camp doctor Kremer.

He moved from being "very very" certain "that there was no gassing" to "100% there were gassings". But the evidence that he cites was already well known by 2017! This means he was not convinced by evidence but by presentation, the same as any other H believer.

As a matter of curiosity, does anyone here agree with Cole's opinion as to his VHS tape's importance? In his last few articles he makes all kinds of claims about how influential he is. Personally I've only seen his footage perhaps ~10 times on X, and that's as someone who actively seeks out Holocaust discussions. It just doesn't seem relevant to anything.

He was violently threatened to recant. So him no acting as believer doesn't really add much credence to the narrative.
It may even backfire.

I also noted that arguments being used aren't exactly convincing. It's meager "I take a point now" type of arguments.