Is the demonization of Hitler as we see even warranted at all?

Everything you always wanted to know about Nazis (but were afraid to ask)
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 3668
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am
Location: 5th Circle of Hell

Re: Is the demonization of Hitler as we see even warranted at all?

Post by Stubble »

Wahrheitssucher wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 8:27 pm
Stubble wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 6:10 pm For those following at home, we have reached this part of the story again.
[...] when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand [...]
In the larger picture — on the world-stage — we also seem to be reaching that same part of the story.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Dude, that thread you took the quote from has been around the circle with confused jew at least 3 times. Sometimes, I too stand there thunderstruck...

/shrug
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Is the demonization of Hitler as we see even warranted at all?

Post by HansHill »

Stubble wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 9:54 pm Sometimes, I too stand there thunderstruck...
/shrug
Dr Dalton changing this line was my 9/11 :(
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 3668
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am
Location: 5th Circle of Hell

Re: Is the demonization of Hitler as we see even warranted at all?

Post by Stubble »

HansHill wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 10:19 pm
Stubble wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 9:54 pm Sometimes, I too stand there thunderstruck...
/shrug
Dr Dalton changing this line was my 9/11 :(
Agreed. He should have left that. It is iconic.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 1000
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Is the demonization of Hitler as we see even warranted at all?

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

Stubble wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 9:54 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 8:27 pm
Stubble wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 6:10 pm For those following at home, we have reached this part of the story again.
In the larger picture — on the world-stage — we also seem to be reaching that same part of the story.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Dude, that thread you took the quote from has been around the circle with confused jew at least 3 times. Sometimes, I too “stand there thunderstruck...”
/shrug
Adolf Hitler: “Ich stand manches Mal starr da”.

Literal translation: “I stood some times frozen (rigid) there”.

Dalton translation: “Sometimes I was simply dumbfounded”.

Mannheim translation: “Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck”.

^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^

…I was often astonished at how easily and often they changed their opinions on the same questions — sometimes within a few days, and sometimes even within a few hours.
I found it difficult to understand how men who were reasonable as individuals suddenly lost this ability as soon as they acted as a mass. This phenomenon often tempted me to despair. I argued with them for hours, and when I succeeded in bringing them to what I considered a reasonable way of thinking, I celebrated my success. But the next day, I found that it was all in vain. It was disgusting to have to begin all over again. Like an eternal pendulum, they would swing back to their absurd opinions.

Success was almost always on my side. The great masses can be rescued, but only by sacrificing much time and patience. But a Jew can never be parted from his opinions.
It was simple enough, at that time, to try to show them the absurdity of their teaching. Within my small circle, I talked to them until my throat ached and my voice grew hoarse. I believed that I could finally convince them... But I only achieved the contrary result. It seemed that the more they understood the destructiveness of Social-Democratic doctrine and its consequences, the more firmly they clung to it.
The more I debated with them, the more familiar I became with their argumentative tactics.
At the outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents; but when they got so tied up that they couldn't find a way out, they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should that fail, in spite of their tricks of logic, they acted as if they couldn't understand the counter arguments, and jumped away to another topic of discussion.
They stated truisms and platitudes; and if you accepted these, they applied them to other matters of an essentially different nature. If you pointed this out, they escaped again and avoided any precise statement.
Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on one of these apostles, one’s hand grasped only a jellylike slime — that slipped through the fingers, and then recombined into a solid mass a moment later.
But if you really struck a blow on one of these adversaries and, due to the audience present, he had to concede the point, a surprise was in store for you the following day. The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before. He would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened. If you became indignant and reminded him of yesterday's defeat, he feigned astonishment, and couldn't remember a thing — except that on the day before, he was proven correct.

Sometimes I was simply dumbfounded.

I don't know what amazed me more: the agility of their speech or their art of lying.
[Dalton translation].

^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^
Je mehr ich dann mit ihnen stritt, um so mehr lernte ich ihre Dialektik kennen. Erst rechneten sie mit der Dummheit ihres Gegners, um dann, wenn sich ein Ausweg nicht mehr fand, sich selber einfach dumm zu stellen. Nützte alles nichts, so verstanden sie nicht recht oder sprangen, gestellt, augenblicklich auf ein anderes Gebiet über, brachten nun Selbstverständlichkeiten, deren Annahme sie aber sofort wieder auf wesentlich andere Stoffe bezogen, um nun, wieder angefaßt, auszuweichen und nichts Genaues zu wissen. Wo immer man so einen Apostel angriff, umschloß die Hand qualligen Schleim; das quoll einem geteilt durch die Finger, um sich im nächsten Moment schon wieder zusammenzuschließen. Schlug man aber einen wirklich so vernichtend, daß er, von der Umgebung beobachtet, nicht mehr anders als zustimmen konnte, und glaubte man, so wenigstens einen Schritt vorwärtsgekommen zu sein, so war das Erstaunen am nächsten Tag groß. Der Jude wußte nun von gestern nicht mehr das geringste, erzählte seinen alten Unfug wieder weiter, als ob überhaupt nichts vorgefallen wäre, und tat, empört zur Rede gestellt, erstaunt, konnte sich an rein gar nichts erinnern, außer an die doch schon am Vortage bewiesene Richtigkeit seiner Behauptungen.
Ich stand manches Mal starr da.
Man wußte nicht, was man mehr bestaunen sollte, ihre Zungenfertigkeit oder ihre Kunst der Lüge.
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 1000
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Is the demonisation of Hitler as we see even warranted at all?

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

.
Q. With all the ‘factories-of-mass-rape’ (comfort women); beheadings by sword; prisoners used for bayonet practice; massacres like at Nanjing; cruel, sadistic treatment and starvation of Allied PoWs; etc., etc., why isn’t there any post-war demonisation of Japanese Emperor Hirohito as great as the demonisation of Adolf?
A: no jooze were badly treated!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Q. With all the mass-murder genocide of Ukranians; the Siberian slave-labour Gulags; the terrorising NKVD thought-police; the greatest crime against fem@les in known history (mass rape by Soviet soldiers in Germany in 1945), etc., etc., why isn’t Stalin demonised as much as Adolf.
A. His victims weren’t jooish.

Q. Why isn’t the demonisation of Mussolini as great as the demonisation of Adolf?
A: not named as part of the ‘poor-joo’, holyH, special-suffering mythology.

A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
User avatar
Eye of Zyclone
Posts: 565
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2025 3:12 pm

Re: Is the demonization of Hitler as we see even warranted at all?

Post by Eye of Zyclone »

The demonization of Hitler is warranted because it is core to the New World Order agenda, that is, a stolen "Holy Land" (the HQ of Jewry's end-times borderless global plantation) and a wiped out White Man (the sine qua non of Jewry's promised world domination). Only too logical. No Hebraic cult without a devil after all...

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
"Holocaust deniers are very slick people. They justify everything they say with facts and figures."
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 1000
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Is the demonisation of Hitler as we see even warranted at all?

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

Wahrheitssucher wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2026 2:41 pm .
Q. With all the ‘factories-of-mass-rape’ (comfort women); beheadings by sword; prisoners used for bayonet practice; massacres like at Nanjing; cruel, sadistic treatment and starvation of Allied PoWs; etc., etc., why isn’t there any post-war demonisation of Japanese Emperor Hirohito as great as the demonisation of Adolf?
A: because no jooze were badly treated!

Q. With all the mass-murder genocide of Ukranians; the Siberian slave-labour Gulags; the terrorising NKVD thought-police; the greatest crime against fem@les in known history (mass rape by Soviet soldiers in Germany in 1945), etc., etc., why isn’t Stalin demonised as much as Adolf.
A. His victims weren’t jooish.

Q. Why isn’t the demonisation of Mussolini as great as the demonisation of Adolf?
A: not named as part of the ‘poor-joo’, holyH, special-suffering mythology.
I’ve just been made aware of an aspect of WW2 history that I was completely unaware of.
That fact alone (that I had never heard of this) I regard as further proof of the biased and deceitful pseudo-history we have all been brainwashed with our whole lives regarding WW2. In other words it demonstrates that current consensus WW2 history is both:
i.) a lie-by-omission ‘history’
plus
ii.) one built on calculatedly-emotive, atrocity-propaganda deceptions.

What I was informed of just now is the following information about a Japanese human experiment unit.
Unit 731 (Japanese: 731部隊, Nana-san-ichi Butai), officially known as the Manchu Detachment 731 and also referred to as the Kamo Detachment: 198  and the Ishii Unit, was a clandestine biological and chemical warfare research facility, operated by the Imperial Japanese Army between 1933 and 1945.

It was located in the Pingfang district of Harbin, in the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo (now part of Northeast China), and maintained multiple branches across mainland China and Southeast Asia under the "Epidemic Prevention Department" umbrella.

During the Second Sino-Japanese War, the unit led the largest attacks in the history of biological warfare, killing approximately 200,000 people in cities and villages, through deliberate contamination of water supplies, food, and agricultural land.

The facility was led by General Shirō Ishii and received strong support from the Japanese military. An estimated 14,000 people were killed by human experimentation in the facility itself.

Its activities included infecting prisoners with deadly diseases, conducting vivisection, performing organ harvesting, testing hypobaric chambers, amputating limbs, and exposing victims to chemical agents and explosives.

After the war, twelve Unit 731 members were tried by the USSR in the 1949 Khabarovsk war crimes trials and sentenced to prison. However, many key figures, including Ishii, were granted immunity in a coverup by the United States in exchange for their research data.

The Truman administration concealed the unit's crimes and paid stipends to former personnel.
The obtained information was not of significant value, as the US biological weapons program had surpassed the capabilities of Unit 731

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731
I was made aware of this unit’s research using human prisoners in an article on RT News.
Prisoners were infected with plague, anthrax, cholera, typhus, gonorrhea, and syphilis. They were also subjected to experiments to test their resistance to dehydration and frostbite. Essentially, the prisoners were subjected to conditions in which the Japanese army would operate in Southeast Asia and the Soviet Far East. These experiments simulated combat conditions more realistically than one could imagine.

For example, weapons such as grenades and bombs were tested on prisoners. To determine the optimal treatment for shrapnel wounds, prisoners were tied to posts and bombs and grenades were detonated at varying distances from them. Autopsies were performed on the dead, and those who survived were treated, but only to be killed in the next experiment. Flamethrowers were also tested on prisoners.

https://rurtnews.com/news/645093-inside ... h-factory/
CONCLUSION:
That we haven’t all been force-fed detailed information of the Unit 731’s cruel experiments leading to great suffering and death of thousands of human prisoners is proof the historical narrative we have been force-fed is politically motivated.

This supports the viewpoint from someone calling themselves ‘Apolitical’ that was recently shared by EofZ (above):
• If you don't believe in the holocaust, you can't argue Hitler was the most evil human to ever exist.
• If Hitler isn't the most evil human ever, there is no reason not to look into National Socialism as a plausible political ideology.
• If you look into National Socialism as a plausible ideology, you might find they had similar complaints to yours today.
• If you find similarities between their complaints and yours, you might find similarities in who is causing the problems.
• Which is why you have to believe in the holocaust as the underpinning of morality for our entire society
and
Why you can't have politicians who advocate nationalism and control of your own country, but instead must have elected officials who are subservient to a Globalist Agenda:
• Controlling your own country = nationalism.
• Nationalism = that’s like the Nazis.
• The Nazis = they did ‘the Holyco$t’.
• The Holyco$t = you can't question it or Jews will attack you, you will lose your job and/or go to jail.
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
Post Reply